Abstract
The thesis of a hermeneutic perspective on validation in simulation has existed ever since Kleindorfer et al. (Manag Sci 44:1087–1099, 1998) published their overview of various positions in the philosophy of science . This chapter introduces the distinction between a hermeneutics in validation and a hermeneutics of validation . I argue that the hermeneutic perspective according to Kleindorfer, O’Neill and Ganeshan, which qualifies as a hermeneutics in validation perspective, is rather fruitless. Instead, a hermeneutics of simulation validation is proposed on the basis of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. The goal of the hermeneutics of validation is to understand simulation validation. The challenge is to set up a hermeneutic situation in the first place. Hermeneutic aims to demonstrate how simulation validation is historically situated, revealing the hidden prejudice (prejudgement) in validating, and distinguishing between legitimate prejudice and prejudice that has to be overcome. Understanding simulation validation is a dialogic, practical, situated activity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The presentation of the hermeneutic perspective on simulation validation by Kleindorfer et al. (1998, pp. 1096–1098 and one row in Table 9.1, p. 1090) amounts to no more than two pages in total. Gadamer’s hermeneutics as put forward in Truth and Method (Gadamer 2013 [original 1960]) serves as a major reference, although it is the reading of Gadamer’s hermeneutics by Bernstein (1983) which the authors actually adopt. This becomes explicit on p. 1098, where they refer to ‘Bernstein’s hermeneutics’. They introduce Bernstein as a philosopher who presents Gadamer’s hermeneutics as a philosophical fulcrum for transcending the polarity of the foundationalist versus anti-foundationalist debate. The authors apply Bernstein’s hermeneutics to validation in simulation, taking two quotations from Barlas and Carpenter (1990) and Carson (1989) to support their arguments.
- 2.
Several formulations of the term ‘hermeneutic circle’ are known. The classic notion refers to the back-and-forth movement of thought from the whole to a part of the object of investigation and back to the whole again, each new understanding of the latter modifying the understanding of the former, and vice versa. The objective is to recover the meaning of the object of the investigation.
References
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1969). Crisis of the republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Barlas, Y., & Carpenter, S. (1990). Philosophical roots of model validation. Two paradigms. System Dynamics Review, 6, 148–166.
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Caldwell, S., & Morrison, R. J. (2000). Validation of longitudinal dynamic microsimulation models. Experience with CORSIM and DYNACAN. In: L. Mitton, H. Sutherland, & M. J. Weeks (Eds.), Microsimulation modelling for policy analysis. Challenges and innovations (pp. 200–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carson, J. S. (1989). Verification and validation. A consultant’s perspective. In: E. A. MacNair, K. J. Musselman, & P. Heidelberger (Eds.), Proceedings 1989 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 552–557).
Crease, R. P. (1997). Hermeneutics and the natural science: Introduction. Man and World, 30, 259–270.
D’Agostino, F. (2014). Hermeneutics, epistemology, and science. In: J. Malpras & H. -H. Gander (Eds.), The Routledge companion to hermeneutics (pp. 417–428). London: Routledge.
Doublet, D. R. (2003). Der Hermeneutische Zirkel: Über Grenzen für die Interpretation und Bedingungen für das Verstehen. In S. U. Larsen & E. Zimmermann (Eds.), Theorien und Methoden in den Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 61–75). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Eger, M. (1997). Achievement of the hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to natural science. A comparison with constructivist sociology. Man and World, 30, 343–367.
Feher, M., Kiss, O., & Ropolyi, L. (Eds.). (1999). Hermeneutics and science. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Feinstein, A. H., & Cannon, H. M. (2003). A hermeneutical approach to external validation of simulation models. Simulation & Gaming, 34, 186–197.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.
Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S. C., Collins, W., Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P., Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., & Rummukainen, M. (2013). Evaluation of climate models. In: Stocker, T. F., D. Qin, G. -K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gadamer, H. -G. (1990). Reply to my critics. In: D. Ormiston & A. Schrift (Eds.), The hermeneutic tradition (pp. 273–297). Albany, NY: Suny Press.
Gadamer, H. -G. (2013). Truth and method. Rev. 2nd edn. Trans. by J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall. London: Bloomsbury. [1st German edition: 1960. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr].
Guillemot, H. (2010). Connections between simulations and observation in climate computer modeling. Scientist’s practices and ‘‘bottom-up epistemology’’ lessons. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 242–252.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Trans. and introduced by T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Trans. and introduced by W. Rehg. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Heelan, P. A. (1998). The scope of hermeneutics in natural science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29, 273–298.
Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending ourselves. Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Humphreys, P. (2009). The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods. Synthese, 169, 615–626.
Kisiel, T. (1997). A hermeneutics of the natural sciences? The debate updated. Man and World, 30, 329–341.
Kleindorfer, G. B., & Geneshan, R. (1993). The philosophy of science and validation in simulation. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Winter Simulation (WSC 1993), New York, NY, USA (pp. 50–57).
Kleindorfer, G. B., O’Neill, L., & Ganeshan, R. (1998). Validation in simulation: Various positions in the philosophy of science. Management Science, 44, 1087–1099.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Malpas, J., & Gander, H.-H. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge companion to hermeneutics. London and New York: Routledge.
Markus, G. (1987). Why is there no hermeneutics of the natural sciences? Some preliminary theses. Science in Context, 1, 5–51.
Naylor, T. H., & Finger, J. M. (1967). Verification of computer simulation models. Management Science, 14, B92–B101.
Newton, P. E., & S. D. Shaw (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. Sage Publications Ltd.
Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994). Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science, 263, 641–646.
Poscher, R. (2014). Hermeneutics, jurisprudence and law. In J. Malpas & H.-H. Gander (Eds.), The Routledge companion to hermeneutics (pp. 451–465). London and New York: Routledge.
Reutlinger, A., Hagleiter, D., & Hartmann, S. (2018). Understanding (with) toy models. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69, 1069–1099.
Ramberg, B., & Gjesdal, K. (2005). Hermeneutics. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (2005 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/hermeneutics/#Pragmatism.
Saam, N. J. (2017). Understanding social science simulations. Distinguishing two categories of simulations. In: M. Resch, A. Kaminski, & P. Gehring (Eds.), The science and art of simulation I. Exploring - Understanding - Knowing (pp. 67–84). Cham: Springer.
Saam, N. J., & Schmidl, A. (2018). ‘A Distinct Element of Play.’ Scientific computer simulation as playful investigating. In: A. Friedrich, P. Gehring, C. Hubig, A. Kaminski, & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Arbeit und Spiel. Jahrbuch Technikphilosophie 2018 (pp. 99–118). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Schlesinger, S. (1979). Terminology for model credibility. Simulation, 32, 103–104.
Shackley, S. (2001). Epistemic lifestyles in climate change modeling. In C. A. Miller & P. N. Edwards (Eds.), Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance (pp. 107–133). Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.
Smith, N. H. (2014). Hermeneutics and critical theory. In: J. Malpas & H. -H. Gander (Eds.), The Routledge companion to hermeneutics (pp. 600–611). London and New York: Routledge.
Steinmann, M. (2007). Auf dem Weg zu einer modernen Epistemologie. In G. Figal (Ed.), Hans-Georg Gadamer: Wahrheit und Methode (pp. 87–103). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Claus Beisbart for helpful discussions concerning this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saam, N.J. (2019). Understanding Simulation Validation—The Hermeneutic Perspective. In: Beisbart, C., Saam, N. (eds) Computer Simulation Validation. Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70765-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70766-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)