Skip to main content

Sensitive and Supportive Interactions: Tuning into Children’s Requests for Help During Art-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communities of Practice: Art, Play, and Aesthetics in Early Childhood

Part of the book series: Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education ((LAAE,volume 21))

  • 2263 Accesses

Abstract

Engaging in sensitive and supportive interactions with young children involved in artistic experiences has long interested parents and to some extent been problematic for educators. For example, while educators may marvel at young children’s apparent innate creativity, they are also aware that children co-construct artistic knowledge, skills and expression through meaningful engagements with people, places and things. Thus, uneasy pedagogical spaces exist between traditional set-up-and-step-back approaches, which some argue promote children’s ‘natural’ creativity, and working alongside children while responding to requests for help, which others may argue promotes artistic growth. Children’s perspectives on their needs and concerns have been accessed in some research and it is timely to re-examine and discuss research-based insights into ways children seek and receive support from others, including siblings, parents and teachers. This chapter explores findings from quantitative and qualitative research in order to outline and illustrate the ways in which children seek and receive help during art making. It provides descriptive accounts of the ways two five-year-old children interacted with others and their environments through their art. Reflecting on children’s accounts of experience prompts consideration of the connections and disconnections between their art experiences in home and educational settings, especially in terms of interpersonal relationships during art-making and the roles educators and adults might take when actively engaging with children through art. They also highlight the value of promoting closer connections between children’s family-based arts education and those had in educational settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All names and places are pseudonyms. All research was carried out in accordance with University and State Education Human Ethics approval processes.

References

  • Alexander, T. K. (1997). Beyond the death of art: Community and the ecology of self. In R. E. Hart & D. R. Anderson (Eds.), Philosophy in experience: American philosophy in transition (pp. 175–194). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anning, A. (2002). Conversations around young children’s drawings: The impact of the beliefs of significant others at home and school. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 21(3), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, L. (2008). Activating postmodern pedagogies in art education. Australian Art Education, 31(1), 80–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government DEEWR. (2009). Belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia Retrieved from http://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia.pdf

  • Bell, D. (2012). Talking about art with young people- Conversational strategies for aesthetic learning in early childhood settings International Art in Early Childhood Research Journal, 1, 1–19. Retrieved from http://artinearlychildhood.org/journals/2012/ARTEC_2012_Research_Journal_1_Article_1_Bell.pdf

  • Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, J. (2012). Reconsidering the educative potential of the arts in early schooling. In O. N. Saracho (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research in creativity in early childhood education (pp. 205–225). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (2002). Drawing to learn. Doctor of Philosophy Web-based Ph.D. thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Retrieved from http://www.une.edu.au/Drawing/main.html

  • Brooks, M. (2005). Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (2006). Drawing: The consequential progression of ideas. New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education, 9, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, E., Jolley, R., & Rose, S. (2010). The attitudes and practices that shape children’s drawing experience at home and at school. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(3), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01658.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deans, J., & Brown, R. (2008). Reflection, renewal and relationship building: An ongoing journey in early childhood arts education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9(4), 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934/2005). Art as experience. New York: Penguin Group (USA) Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1973–1974). Examining some myths in art education. Studies in Art Education, 15(3), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, W. (2007). Thirty years of collaborating with children. Visual Arts Research, 33, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flewitt, R. (2005). Is every child’s voice heard? Researching the different ways 3-year-old children communicate and make meaning at home and in a pre-school playgroup. Early Years, 25(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140500251558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, A. C. (2000). Teachers’ beliefs in relation to visual art education in early childhood centres. New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education, 3, 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopperstad, M. H. (2008). Relationships between children’s drawing and accompanying peer interaction in teacher-initiated drawing sessions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760802044844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janesick, V. J. (2008). Art and experience: Lessons from Dewey and Hawkins. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 477–484). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. (2002). Is art good for us? Beliefs about high culture in American life. Lanham, MD: Rowen and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V., & Souberman, E. (1978). Afterword. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (1996a). Artistic learning in early childhood: A study of social interactions. Canadian Review of Art Education, 21(2), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (1996b). Myths, habits, research, and policy: Four pillars of early childhood art education. Arts Education Policy Review, 97(4), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, G. (2015). Visual art education: The tangle of beliefs. Bedrock, 20(3), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, L. (2013). “No one’s the boss of my painting:” A model of the early development of artistic graphic representation. International Journal of Education & The Arts, 14(11). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v14n11/

  • Lowenfeld, V. (1947). The nature of creative activity. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttrell, W. (2010). ‘A camera is a big responsibility’: A lens for analysing children’s visual voices. Visual Studies, 25(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586x.2010.523274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malin, H. (2013). Making meaningful: Intention in children’s art making. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01719.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2017). Te Whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V. (2005). Ethical issues in collaborative research with children. In A. Farrell (Ed.), Ethical research with children (pp. 150–165). Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahey, C. (2009). The story in the picture: Inquiry and artmaking with young children. New York/Reston, VA: Teachers College Press/National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevanen, S., Juvonen, A., & Ruismäki, H. (2014). Kindergarten and school as a learning environment for art. International Journal of Education Through Art, 10(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta.10.1.7_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSW Board of Studies. (2001). Creative Arts K-6 syllabus. Sydney, NSW: Board of Studies. Retrieved from http://k6.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/files/arts/k6_creative_arts_syl.pdf

  • NSW Department of Education and Training. (2006). Curriculum planning, programming, assessing & reporting to parents K-12. Retrieved from http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/timetoteach/index.htm

  • Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography (3rd ed.). London: UK Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, G., Gamannossi, B. A., & Cameron, C. A. (2011). From scribbles to meanings: Social interaction in different cultures and the emergence of young children’s early drawing. Early Child Development and Care, 181(4), 425–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plows, J. (2013). Three-year-old visual artists: Their interactions during art making. (Master of Education), The University of Auckland, Auckland. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/2292/20535/whole.pdf?sequence=2

  • Pohio, L. (2006). Visual art: A valuable medium for promoting peer collaboration in early childhood contexts. Early Education, 40, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, H. (1943). Education through art. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. D. (2005). Critically re-examining young children’s art experiences Early Education, 37(15–21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. D. (2007). Outdated relics on hallowed ground: Unearthing attitudes and beliefs about young children’s art. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 32(4), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. D. (2009a). Jake just does scribbles but I do pictures: Drawing self-efficacy and the messages four- to nine-year-old children give and receive about their drawing. Köln: Lambert Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. D. (2009b). Young visual ethnographers: Children’s use of digital photography to record, share and extend their art experiences. International Art in Early Childhood Research Journal, 1(1), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.artinearlychildhood.org/artec/images/article/ARTEC_2009_Research_Journal_1_Article_3.pdf

  • Richards, R. D. (2010). Narratives within narratives: One young Chinese-Australian boy’s exploration of ideas of difference, identity, and friendship through his drawings. Current Narratives, 1(2), 84–103. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=currentnarratives

  • Richards, R. D. (2012). Young children’s art experiences: A visual ethnographic study with four children in their homes, early childhood centre and schools. Doctor of Philosophy Ph.D. thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. D. (2014). The private and public worlds of children’s spontaneous art. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. D. (2017). Young children’s use of drawings and storytelling to mediate complex worlds of cultural and linguistic diversity. In M. Narey (Ed.), Multimodal perspectives of language, literacy, and learning in early childhood: The creative and critical “art” of making meaning (pp. 127–147). New York/London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, K. A. (2003). Young children drawing at home, pre-school and school: The influence of socio-cultural context. Doctor of Education dissertation, Leeds University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, K. A. (2006a). Supporting young children drawing: Developing a role. International Journal of Education Through Art, 2(3), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, K. A. (2006b). What mothers do: Everyday routines and rituals and their impact upon young children’s use of drawing for meaning making. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(1), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saracho, O. N. (2012). Teachers’ perspectives and behaviors on creativity. In O. N. Saracho (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research in creativity in early childhood education (pp. 355–375). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunday, K. (2012). “I’m going to have to draw it to find out”: Children’s drawing performances, knowing, and the formation of egocentric speech. International Art in Early Childhood Research Journal, 1, 1–19. Retrieved from http://artinearlychildhood.org/journals/2012/ARTEC_2012_Research_Journal_1_Article_3_Sunday.pdf

  • Thompson, C. M. (2002). Drawing together: Peer influence in preschool-kindergarten art classes. In L. Bresler & C. M. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children’s lives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. M. (2005). The ket aesthetic: Visual culture in childhood. The International Journal of Arts Education, 3(1), 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. M. (2009). Mira! Looking, listening, and lingering in research with children. Visual Arts Research, 35(1), 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. (2005). The historical, philosophical and theoretical influences on early childhood visual arts education in Aotearoa New Zealand. ACEpapers, 16, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in toddler art education: A tension between developmental and sociocultural perspectives. Master of Education M.Ed. dissertation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. (2013). Changing times and changing contexts: Examining visual arts provision for infants and toddlers. In B. Clark, A. Grey, & L. Terreni (Eds.), Kia tipu te wairua toi. Fostering the creative spirit: Arts in early childhood education. Auckland: Pearson New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 19–120). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986/1934). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (2003). Three sites for visual cultural pedagogy: Honoring students’ interests and imagery. The International Journal of Arts Education, 1(3), 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (2007). Art, visual culture, and child/adult collaborative images: Recognizing the other-than. Visual Arts Research, 33, 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., & Hall, E. (2011). Drawings as spaces for intellectual play. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(3–4), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2011.642253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. K. (2012). Ways of knowing in the arts. In S. Wright (Ed.), Children, meaning-making and the arts (2nd ed., pp. 1–29). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, M. J. (2003). Talking, thinking, responding and creating: A survey of literature on talk in art education. Studies in Art Education, 44(2), 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemary Richards .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Richards, R. (2018). Sensitive and Supportive Interactions: Tuning into Children’s Requests for Help During Art-Making. In: Schulte, C., Thompson, C. (eds) Communities of Practice: Art, Play, and Aesthetics in Early Childhood. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70644-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70644-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70643-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70644-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics