Skip to main content

On the Flesh of Violence: The (Phenomenological) Dilemma in Researching Violence and Its Transrational Transformation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transrational Resonances

Abstract

In this chapter, the concept of the paradoxical open gestalt of violence is unfolded by describing an alternative approach to research on violence, which combines the phenomenological ontology of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, particularly his notion of the term flesh with the transrational ontology elaborated by Wolfgang Dietrich. The aim is to overcome a Marxist view of emancipatory politics that focuses on the economic base of society and also a postmodern perspective referring to Wittgenstein and understanding the limits of language as the limits of the world. By shifting the locus of authority into the inner self, this contribution is the attempt to integrate an emancipatory aspect into violence research and empower the individual who is the experiencer of violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gestalt goes back to Gestalt Therapy and means shaping a meaningful whole and is here also based on Merleau-Ponty’s thoughts. He describes gestalt as “a whole that does not reduce itself to the sum of the parts- a negative, exterior definition- A designation of the Gestalt by contrast with the domain of the in itself in which one is installed (…).” (Merleau-Ponty 1968, 204–205).

  2. 2.

    See for this purpose in particular the work of the Bielefelder Schule [Eng. Bielefeld School] of Wilhelm Heitmeyer since 1994.

  3. 3.

    Gewalt schafft Chaos, und Ordnung schafft Gewalt. Dieses Dilemma ist unauflösbar” (Original in German in Sofsky 2005, 10).

  4. 4.

    “Human expressivity is capable of objectivation, that is, it manifests itself in products of human activity that are available both to their producers and to other men as elements of a common world. Such objectivations serve as more or less enduring indices of the subjective processes of their producers, allowing their availability to extend beyond the face-to-face situation in which they can be directly apprehended” (Berger and Luckmann 1991, 49).

  5. 5.

    Selbst das Widerfahrnis der Gewalt in seiner sinnlichen Unmittelbarkeit, so lässt sich geltend machen, ist in gewisser Weise durch sprachliche Praktiken vorstrukturiert” (Original in German in Kuch 2014, 72).

  6. 6.

    On this subject, see Norbert Koppensteiner’s chapter (Chap. 4) in the current volume.

  7. 7.

    Die Gewalt spricht nicht” (Original in German, Reemtsma 2002).

  8. 8.

    On this subject, see exemplary Perls (1969) and Perls, Hefferline and Goodman (1991).

  9. 9.

    On this subject, see Shamal Amin und Nigar Hasib’ chapter (Chap. 18) in the current volume.

  10. 10.

    For further details, visit Lalish Theater (2017).

References

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On Violence. San Diego: A Harvest Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1991. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Andreas M., and Ingo Henneberg, eds. 2014. Iran, die Bombe und das Streben nach Sicherheit. Strukturierte Konfliktanalysen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacker, Thorsten, ed. 2008. Sozialwissenschaftliche Konflikttheorien: Eine Einführung (Friedens- und Konfliktforschung). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacker, Thorsten, and Christoph Weller, eds. 2006. Konflikte der Weltgesellschaft: Akteure – Strukturen – Dynamiken. Frankfurt am/New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, Clifford G. 2011. Politics and Ethics. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 61–80. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 2008. Violence. A Micro-sociological Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Wolfgang. 2008. Variationen über die vielen Frieden, Band 1: Deutungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Variationen über die vielen Frieden, Band 2: Elicitive Konflikttransformation und die transrationale Wende der Friedenspolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. A Brief Introduction to Transrational Peace Research and Elicitive Conflict Transformation. Journal of Conflictology 5 (2): 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Variationen über die vielen Frieden, Band 3: Elicitive Conflict Mapping. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Shaun. 1986. Lived Body and Environment. Research in Phenomenology 16 (1): 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johann. 1969. Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research 6 (3): 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieger, Katja, Christina Clemm, Anita Eckhardt, and Anna Hartmann. 2014. Fallanalyse zu bestehenden Schutzlücken in der Anwendung des deutschen Sexualstrafrechts bezüglich erwachsener Betroffener. Berlin: bff: Frauen gegen Gewalt e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulowski, Rebecca, and Christoph Weller. 2014. Gewalt ist keine Aggression. In Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie, ed. Gerald Hartung and Matthias Hergen, 85–91. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2004. Multitude. Krieg und Demokratie im Empire. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitmeyer, Wilhelm. 1994. Das Desintegrations-Theorem. Ein Erklärungsansatz zu fremdenfeindlich motivierter, rechtsextremistischer Gewalt und zur Lähmung gesellschaftlicher Institutionen. In Das Gewalt-Dilemma. Gesellschaftliche Reaktionen auf fremdenfeindliche Gewalt und Rechtsextremismus, ed. Wilhelm Heitmeyer, 29–69. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbusch, Peter. 2000. Gewalt – Stochern in unübersichtlichem Gelände. Mittelweg 36 (2): 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbusch, Peter, and Ralf Zoll, eds. 2004. Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuch, Hannes. 2014. Zwei Formen sprachlicher Gewalt. In Gewaltbefragungen. Beiträge zur Theorie von Politik und Gewalt, ed. Franziska Martinsen and Oliver Flügel-Martinsen, 71–98. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalish Theater. 2017. http://www.lalishtheater.org/about/. Accessed 15 Aug 2017

  • Lederach, John Paul. 1995. Preparing for Peace. Conflict Transformation Across Cultures. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. Intercourse: Good Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liell, Christoph. 1999. Der Doppelcharakter von Gewalt: Diskursive Konstruktion und soziale Praxis. In Ordnungen der Gewalt. Beiträge zu einer politischen Soziologie der Gewalt und des Krieges, ed. Sighard Neckel and Michael Schwab-Trapp. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 1988. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man. Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, James. 2005. Shame and Guilt. In Phänomenologie und Gewalt, ed. Harun Maye and Hans Rainer Sepp, 182–192. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1963. In Praise of Philosophy and Other Essays. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1968. In The Visible and the Invisible, ed. Claude Lefort. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perls, Frederick S. 1969. Das Ich, der Hunger und die Aggression. Die Anfänge der Gestalt-Therapie. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perls, Frederick S., Ralph Hefferline, and Paul Goodman. 1991. Gestalt-Therapie. Lebensfreude und Persönlichkeitsentfaltung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reemtsma, Jan Philipp. 2002. Die Gewalt spricht nicht. Drei Reden. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Vertrauen und Gewalt: Versuch über eine besondere Konstellation der Moderne. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean Paul. 1978. Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology. New York: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofsky, Wolfgang. 1993. The Order of Terror: The Concentration Camp. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Traktat über die Gewalt. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorel, Georges. 1999. [1908]. Sorel: Reflections on Violence. ed. Jeremy Jennings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudigl, Michael. 2013. Towards a Relational Phenomenology of Violence. Human Studies 36 (1): 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stueber, Karsten. 2014 Empathy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/empathy/. Accessed 18 Aug 2017.

  • Trotha, Trutz von. 1997. Soziologie der Gewalt. In Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderhefte. Sonderheft 37/1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gulowski, R. (2018). On the Flesh of Violence: The (Phenomenological) Dilemma in Researching Violence and Its Transrational Transformation. In: Echavarría Alvarez, J., Ingruber, D., Koppensteiner, N. (eds) Transrational Resonances . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70616-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics