Competence Assessment with Representations of Practice in Text, Comic and Video Format

  • Marita FriesenEmail author
  • Sebastian Kuntze
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)


Representations of classroom practice are considered to be particularly suitable for assessing aspects of teacher competence. However, the role of representation formats in the design of test instruments has been investigated only scarcely so far. Consequently, the study presented in this chapter addresses the question whether N = 162 pre-service teachers’ analyzing of six classroom situations is related to the format those situations are represented in (text, comic or video). Given the high relevance of dealing with multiple representations in the mathematics classroom, the study focuses on pre-service teachers’ competence of analyzing how multiple representations of mathematical objects are used and connected to each other. The results indicate that representations of practice in the formats video, text and comic are comparably suitable for competence assessment in this context.


Representations of practice Competence assessment Video Comic Analyzing 



This study is supported in the framework of the project EKoL, a cooperation with Heidelberg University of Education supported by the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts in Baden-Wuerttemberg.


  1. Acevedo Nistal, A., van Dooren, W., Clareboot, G., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: A critical review. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41(5), 627–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, S. (2006). A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 25–48). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shalvelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies. Competence viewed as continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Borko, H. (2016). Methodological contributions to video-based studies of classroom teaching and learning: A commentary. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(1), 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015a). Teachers’ professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015b). Teachers facing the dilemma of multiple representations being aid and obstacle for learning: Evaluations of tasks and theme-specific noticing. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 36(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dreyfus, T. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25–41). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friesen, M., Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ growth in analysing classroom videos. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME9) (pp. 2783–2789). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education and ERME.Google Scholar
  12. Friesen, M., & Kuntze, S. (2016). Teacher students analyse texts, comics and video-based classroom vignettes regarding the use of representations—Does format matter? In C. Csíkos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 259–266). Szeged, Hungary: PME.Google Scholar
  13. Goldin, G. (2008). Perspectives on representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 176–201). Routledge: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  14. Goldin, G., & Shteingold, N. (2001). Systems of representation and the development of mathematicalconcepts. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The role of representation in school mathematics (pp. 1–23). Boston, Virginia: NCTM.Google Scholar
  15. Hartig, J. (2008). Psychometric models for the assessment of competencies. In J. Hartig, E. Klieme, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Assessment of competencies in educational contexts (pp. 69–90). Cambridge, USA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Herbst, P., Aaron, W., & Erickson, A. (2013). How preservice teachers respond to representations of practice: A comparison of animations and video. Paper presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  17. Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Chen, C., Chieu, V. M., & Weiss, M. (2011). Using comics-based representations of teaching, and technology, to bring practice to teacher education courses. ZDM The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Kosko, K. W., et al. (2016). Using multimedia questionnaires to study influences on decisions mathematics teachers make in instructional situations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(1), 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herbst, P., & Kosko, K. W. (2014). Using representations of practice to elicit mathematics teachers’ tacit knowledge of practice: A comparison of responses to animations and videos. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(6), 515–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Hoth, J., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2015). About the complexities of video-based assessments: Theoretical and methodological approaches to overcoming shortcomings of research on teachers’ competence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kleinknecht, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and how do they feel when they analyze videos of themselves teaching and of other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuntze, S., Dreher, A., & Friesen, M. (2015). Teachers’ resources in analysing mathematical content and classroom situations—The case of using multiple representations. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME9) (pp. 3213–3219). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education and ERME.Google Scholar
  23. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge, US: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oser, F., Salzmann, P., & Heinzer, S. (2009). Measuring the competence-quality of vocational teachers: An advocatory approach. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1, 65–83.Google Scholar
  26. Rauch, D., & Hartig, J. (2010). Multiple-choice versus open-ended response formats of reading test items: A two-dimensional IRT analysis. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4), 354–379.Google Scholar
  27. Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shavelson, R. (2013). An approach to testing and modeling competence. In S. Blömeke, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn, & J. Fege (Eds.), Modeling and measuring competencies in higher education. Tasks and challenges (pp. 29–43). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Weinert, F. E. (1999). Concepts of competence. Munich: Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research.Google Scholar
  32. Wu, M., Adams, R., Wilson, M., & Haldane, S. (2007). Acer ConQuest version 2.0. Generalised item response modelling software. Victoria: Acer Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ludwigsburg University of EducationLudwigsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations