# Simulations as a Tool for Practicing Questioning

## Abstract

In this chapter we discuss some of the affordances and constraints of using online teaching simulations to support reflection on specific pedagogical actions. We share data from a research project in which we implemented multiple iterations of a set of simulated teaching experiences in an elementary mathematics methods course. In each experience, preservice teachers contrasted the consequences of different pedagogical choices in response to a particular example of student thinking. We share how their evaluations of their choices shifted within experiences at certain points, and their criteria for “good” questions began to evolve. We end with implications for how simulations can promote critical reflection on teaching practice.

## Keywords

Representations of practice Teaching simulations Questioning Preservice teacher education Elementary mathematics## Notes

### Acknowledgements

The storyboards presented in Fig. 1 were created with the LessonSketch platform. LessonSketch is designed and developed by Pat Herbst, Dan Chazan, and Vu-Minh Chieu with the GRIP lab, School of Education, University of Michigan. The development of this environment has been supported with funds from National Science Foundation grants ESI-0353285, DRL-0918425, DRL-1316241, and DRL-1420102. The graphics used in the creation of these storyboards are © 2015 The Regents of the University of Michigan, all rights reserved. Used with permission.

## References

- Amador, J. M., Estapa, A., de Araujo, Z., Kosko, K. W., & Weston, T. (2017). Eliciting and analyzing preservice teachers’ mathematical noticing.
*Mathematics Teacher Educator,**5*(2), 159–178.Google Scholar - Baldinger, E. E., Selling, S. K., & Virmani, R. (2016). Supporting novice teachers in leading discussions that reach a mathematical point: Defining and clarifying mathematical ideas.
*Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5*(1).Google Scholar - Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education.
*Journal of Teacher Education,**60*(5), 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bartell, T., Webel, C., Bowen, B., & Dyson, N. (2013). Prospective teacher learning: Recognizing evidence of conceptual understanding.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,**16*(1), 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Beilstein, S. O., Perry, M., & Bates, M. S. (2017). Prompting meaningful analysis from pre-service teachers using elementary mathematics video vignettes.
*Teaching and Teacher Education,**63,*285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Boaler, J. (2003). Studying and capturing the complexity of practice—The case of the “dance of agency”. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th Conference of PME-NA*(Vol. 1, pp. 3–16). Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar - Borko, H., Peressini, D., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., Willis-Yorker, C., Wooley, C., et al. (2000). Teacher education does matter: A situative view of learning to teach secondary mathematics.
*Educational Psychologist,**35*(3), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chval, K., Lannin, J., & Jones, D. (2013).
*Putting essential understanding of fractions into practice in grades 3-5*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - de Araujo, Z., Amador, J., Estapa, A., Kosko, K., Weston, T., & Aming-Attai, R. (2015). Animating preservice teachers’ noticing.
*Mathematics Teacher Education & Development,**17*(2), 25–44.Google Scholar - Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms.
*Journal of Teacher Education,**60*(4), 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Givvin, K. B., Hiebert, J., Jacobs, J. K., Hollingsworth, H., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Are there national patterns of teaching? Evidence from the TIMSS 1999 video study.
*Comparative Education Review,**49*(3), 311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967).
*The discovery of grounded theory*. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar - Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective.
*Teachers College Record,**111*(9), 2055–2100.Google Scholar - Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Breyfogle, M. L. (2005). Questioning our patterns of questioning.
*Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School,**10*(9), 484–489.Google Scholar - Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Chen, C.-L., Chieu, V.-M., & Weiss, M. (2011). Using comics-based representations of teaching, and technology, to bring practice to teacher education courses.
*ZDM Mathematics Education,**43,*91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching.
*Journal of Teacher Education,**58*(1), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (2016). Responding to children’s mathematical thinking in the moment: An emerging framework of teaching moves.
*ZDM Mathematics Education,**48*(1–2), 185–197. doi: 10.1007/s11858-015-0717-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Noticing of children’s mathematical thinking.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**41*(2), 169–202.Google Scholar - Kawanaka, T., & Stigler, J. W. (1999). Teachers’ use of questions in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan, and the United States.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning,**1*(4), 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms.
*The Elementary School Journal,**102*(1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kosko, K. W. (2016). Primary teachers’ choice of probing questions: Effects of MKT and supporting student autonomy.
*IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11*(4), 991-1012.Google Scholar - Kuntze, S., Dreher, A., & Friesen, M. (2015). Teachers’ resources in analysing mathematical content and classroom situations: The case of using multiple representations. In
*CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education*(pp. 3213–3219).Google Scholar - Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., et al. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching.
*Journal of Teacher Education,**64*(3), 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Milewski, A., & Strickland, S. (2016). (Toward) developing a common language for describing instructional practices of responding: A teacher-generated framework.
*Mathematics Teacher Educator,**4*(2), 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Moyer, P. S., & Milewicz, E. (2002). Learning to question: Categories of questioning used by preservice teachers during diagnostic mathematics interviews.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,**5*(4), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014).
*Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all*. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar - Nicol, C. (1999). Learning to teach mathematics: Questioning, listening, and responding.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**37,*45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shaughnessy, M., Boerst, T., & Ball, D. L. (2015). Simulating teaching: New possibilities for assessing teaching practices. In T. G. Bartell, K. N. Bieda, R. T. Putnam, K. Bradfield, & H. Dominguez (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(pp. 924–927). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar - Sherin, M. G. (2002). A balancing act: Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,**5,*205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Spangler, D. A., & Hallman-Thrasher, A. (2014). Using task dialogues to enhance preservice teachers’ abilities to orchestrate discourse.
*Mathematics Teacher Educator,**3*(1), 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,**11*(2), 107–125. doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stigler, J. W., Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (1996). Traditions of school mathematics in Japanese and American elementary classrooms. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.),
*Theories of mathematical learning*(pp. 149–177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Sun, J., & van Es, E. A. (2015). An exploratory study of the influence that analyzing teaching has on preservice teachers’ classroom practice.
*Journal of Teacher Education,**66*(3), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,**13*(2), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wagner, A. C. (1973). Changing teaching behavior: A comparison of microteaching and cognitive discrimination training.
*Journal of Educational Psychology,**64*(3), 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups.
*Journal of the Learning Sciences,**15*(1), 63–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Webel, C., & Conner, K. A. (2015). Designing simulated student experiences to improve teacher questioning. In
*Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(pp. 976–979). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar - Webel, C., & Conner, K. (2017). Using simulated teaching experiences to perturb preservice teachers' questioning practices.
*Mathematics Teacher Educator,**6*(1), 9–24.Google Scholar - Wood, T. (1998). Alternate patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing. In H. Steinbring, M. G. B. Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.),
*Language and learning in the mathematics classroom*(pp. 167–178). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar