Advertisement

Ecogeochemical Assessment of Soil Cover of the Ufa City, Bashkortostan

  • R. Suleymanov
  • R. Urazgildin
  • K. Amineva
  • A. Suleymanov
  • E. V. AbakumovEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)

Abstract

Soils of Ufa city were previously under-investigated in terms of chemical pollution and anthropogenic impacts. This study shows the different trends of soil chemical transformation under different functional load (industrial zone, parks and natural environments). Anthropogenic transformed Umbric Luvisols and Albeluvisols were studied in terms of basic chemical properties and trace elements content. Data show that oil pollution results in an accumulation of carbon and nitrogen. However, this accumulation does not correspond to real humus accumulation, but to the accumulation of black-carbon-like fractions. Redistribution of trace elements over depth is typical for the contaminated soils. Zinc concentrations do not exceed the permissible values, but the trends of zinc migration down the soil profile are evident. Lead concentrations increase in contaminated soils, but permissible concentrations are not exceeded. Urban soil contamination leads not only to the accumulation of contaminants in the upper soil horizons, but also to the redistribution of some trace elements in the soil profile.

Keywords

Soils Urban ecosystems Contamination Forest-steppe zone 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Russian Scientific Foundation, project No. 17-16-01030 “Soil biota dynamics in chronoseries of posttechnogenic landscapes: analyses of soil-ecological effectiveness of ecosystems restoration”.

References

  1. 1.
    Arinushkina, E.V.: Manual on the chemical analysis of soils. Moscow State University (1970)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brishke, M.E.: Atomic absorption spectrochemistry analyses (Methods of analythical chemistry). 224 p. M. Chemistry (1982)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mukatanov, A.H.: Soil-ecological regions of Bashkortostan. Trans. Bashkirian Acad. Sci. 1(2), 62–69 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Federal environmental regulations PND F 16.1.41–04. Quantitative chemical analysis of soils. In: Methods of Measurement of Mass Concentration of Petroleum Products in the Soil Samples by Gravimetric Method, Moscow (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forest of Bashkotrostan. Ed. Hayretdinov A.F.: Ufa. 400 p. (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Codina, L.A.: Geochemical diagnostics of oil contamination of soil. In: Recovery of Oil-Contaminated Soil Ecosystems, pp. 112–122. Nauka (1988)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahatkina, M.I., Tsutsaeva, V.V., Novak, A.V.: The composition of humus floodplain soils contaminated with oil. In: Rational Use of Soil and Soil Cover of Western Siberia, TSU, Tomsk, pp. 89–97 (1986)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Voevodina, T.S., Rusanov, A.M., Suleymanov, R.R.: Assessment of phytotoxicity and level of chemical contamination of soils of Orenburg roadside area. Vestn. Bashkir State Agrarian Univ. 3(35), 9–13 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Suleymanov
    • 1
  • R. Urazgildin
    • 1
  • K. Amineva
    • 1
  • A. Suleymanov
    • 2
  • E. V. Abakumov
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Ufa Institute of BiologyUfaRussia
  2. 2.Moscow State University of Geodesy and CartographyMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Saint-Petersburg State UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations