Soil Functional-Environmental Evaluation and Monitoring in Urban Ecosystems: Principal Functions, Background Objects and Uniform Algorithms of Assessment

  • Ivan I. VasenevEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)


The paper presents the regional automated system of soil functional-environmental assessment (RASSCA) reflecting soil provincial genesis and functional features. It allows evaluating soil integral functional and environmental quality even in heterogeneous land plots. The RASSCA identifies and quantifies the limiting factors and principal parameters of soils’ functional quality and environmental status as well as priority issues of their land-use. The RASSCA conducts environmental computer simulation, search and target prediction of soil quality changes and environmental problems’ solution that improve the effectiveness of land-use decision-making – by prior functional-environmental analysis and comparison of the various scenarios of their outcomes and consequences. The RASSCA was used for the functional-environmental analysis of urban soils in the Chernozemic region of Russia (Kursk city), where natural soils are dominated by Chernic Phaeozems and Luvic-Chernozems. We focused on the polluted urban soils to identify the key environmental problems of soil technogenic degradation. The RASSCA allowed evaluating soil limiting parameters and environmental factors to identify the priority issues and to model the target changes in the integrated functional-environmental quality of soils by improving their limiting parameters. Conducted monitoring of Kursk soil technogenic successions highlighted the importance of soil metamorphic and migration processes. The over-compaction in urban soils was up to 0.3 g cm−3 year−1; an average rate of humification/dehumification– 3.0 g kg−1 year−1; acidification/alkalization −0.1 pH year−1 and heavy metals migration – up to 50–60 g cm m−2 year−1. Some of these data considerably extend the known ranges of elementary soil processes rates “in situ” and allow for better estimation of the real potentials of soil functioning in different landscape-environmental conditions of forest-steppe zone.


Ecology Soil evaluation Soil function Monitoring Soil assessment algorithm Soil contamination Urban ecosystems Urban soils 



This work was supported by the RF President grant# NSh-10347. 2013.11.


  1. 1.
    Addiscott, T.M., Wagenet, R.J.: Concepts of solute leaching in soils: a review of modelling approaches. J. Soil Sci. 36, 411–424 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouma, J.: Land evaluation for landscape units. In: Sumner, M.E. (ed.) Handbook of Soil Science, pp. E-393–E-412. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sumner, M.E. (ed.): Handbook of Soil Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tchernogorov, A.L., Tchekmaryov, P.A., Vasenev, I.I., Gogmachadze, G.D.: Land Agroecological Evaluation and Land-Use Optimization, 268 p. Moscow University Press, Moscow (2012). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vasenev, V.I., Stoorvogel, J.J., Ananyeva, N.D., Ivashchenko, K.V., Sarzhanov, D.A., Epikhina, A.S., Vasenev, I.I., Valentini, R.: Quantifying spatial-temporal variability of carbon stocks and fluxes in urban soils: from local monitoring to regional modeling. In: Muthu, S.S. (ed.) Carbon Footprint Handbook, pp. 185–221. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rossiter, D.G.: A theoretical framework for land evaluation. Geoderma 72, 165–190 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Lanen, H.A.J., Hack-ten Broeke, M.J.D., Bouma, J., de Groot, W.J.M.: A mixed qualitative/quantitative land evaluation methodology. Geoderma 55, 37–54 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prokof’eva, T.V., Gerasimova, M.I., Bezuglova, O.S., Bakhmatova, K.A., Gol’eva, A.A., Gorbov, S.N., Zharikova, E.A., Matinyan, N.N., Nakvasina, E.N., Sivtseva, N.E.: Inclusion of soils and soil-like bodies of urban territories into the Russian soil classification system. Eur. Soil Sci. 47, 959–967 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salvati, L., Ferrara, C., Ranalli, F.: Changes at the fringe: soil quality and environmental vulnerability during intense urban expansion. Eur. Soil Sci. 47, 1068–1075 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greinert, A.: The heterogeneity of urban soils in the light of their properties. J. Soils Sed. 15, 1725–1737 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vasenev, I.I., Buzilev, A.V., Kurbatova, J.A., Chistotin, M.V., Rudnev, N.I., Tiunov, A.I.: Agroecological modelling and design. In: Vasenev, I.I. (ed.) 264 p. RTSAU, Moscow (2010). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vasenev, I.I., Buzilev, A.V.: Land Agroecological Evaluation Automated Systems, 172 p. RTSAU, Moscow (2010). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vasenev, I.I.: Soil and land-use planning. In: Nortcliff, S. (ed.) Task Force: Soil Matters – Solutions Under Foots, pp. 100–104. GeoEcology Essays, Catena Verlag (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wagenet, R.J., Hutson, J.L.: Soil quality and its dependence on dynamic physical processes. J. Environ. Qual. 26, 41–48 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vasenev, I.I., Vizirskaya, M.M., Vasenev, V.I., Valentini, R., Raskatova, T.V.: Comparative analysis of principal factors of spatial-temporal variability of CO2 emission from Moscow urban soils with various levels of anthropogenic impact. Izvestia Timiryazev Agric. Acad. (Special Issue), 11–23 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mikhilova, E.A.: Botanical composition, soil and forage quality under different management regimes in Russian grasslands. In: Mikhilova, E.A., Bryant, R.B., Post, C.J., Cherney, D.J.R., Vassenev, I.I.: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 213–226 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mikhilova, E.A., Bryant, R.B., Vassenev, I.I., Schwager, S.J., Post, C.J.: Cultivation effects on soil organic carbon and total nitrogen at depth in the Russian Chernozem. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 738–745 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sarzhanov, D.A., Vasenev, V.I., Sotnikova, Y.L., Tembo, A., Vasenev, I.I., Valentini, R.: Short-term dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of CO2 emission from the soils of natural and urban ecosystems in the Central Chernozemic Region. Eur. Soil Sci. 48(4), 416–424 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University (RTSAU)MoscowRussia
  2. 2.Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU)VladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations