Chemodiagnostic by Lipid Analysis of the Microbial Community Structure in Trace Metal Polluted Urban Soil
This study is focused on assessment of microbial community structure differences in urban soils by means of lipid analysis. Soil samples (0–20 cm deep topsoil layer) contaminated with trace metals to various extents were taken from six sites located in the rural part of the city of Kirov (Russia). The samples were measured for pH and total Pb, Ni, Cr, and Cd. To study the microbial community, microorganism markers (fatty acids) were extracted, which were then diagnosed by mass spectrometry. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling plots of soil communities showed relative dissimilarity in control and polluted soils. The total lipid content in control samples was found to be significantly higher than in polluted soil. The highest indicator value was assigned to Actinobacteria phylum, whose concentration decreased remarkably in polluted samples, and anaerobes Butyrivibrio sp. and Bifidobacterium sp. were regarded as an indicator for soils with relatively low pollution exposure. Microbial profiles were also indicative of selective enrichment with competent species (Desulfovibrio sp., Bacteroides fragilis, and Chlamydia sp.) in soil greatly contaminated with heavy metals. This study suggests that the method of lipid diagnostic can be highly indicative of soil microbial structure and thus it can be used as a quantitative measurement of urban soil biological quality.
KeywordsSoil quality Lipid markers Microbial biodiversity Heavy metal Urban soil Ordination Nonmetric multidimensional scaling
This work was supported by Russian Science Foundation [grant 14-50-00029, in part Microbiological Analysis Using Lipid Markers] and by program of Presidium of RAS # I. 21П Biodiversity of natural systems. Biological resources of Russia: assessment of the state and fundamental bases of monitoring [in part of Soil Chemical Properties].
- 2.Azarbad, H., van Straalen, N.M., Laskowski, R., Nikiel, K., Röling, W., Niklińska, M.: Susceptibility to additional stressors in metal-tolerant soil microbial communities from two pollution gradients. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 98, 233–242 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Barreiro, A., Fontúrbel, M.T., Lombao, A., Martín, A., Vega, J.A., Fernández, C., Carballas, T., Díaz-Raviña, M.: Using phospholipid fatty acid and community level physiological profiling techniques to characterize soil microbial communities following an experimental fire and different stabilization treatments. CATENA 135, 419–429 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Dufrene, M., Legendre, P.: Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67(3), 345–366 (1997)Google Scholar
- 6.Frostegard, A., Tunlid, A., Baath, E.: Phospholipid fattyacid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from 2 soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59(11), 3605–3617 (1993)Google Scholar
- 11.Azarbad, H., van Straalen, N.M., Laskowski, R., Nikiel, K., Röling, W.F., Niklińska, M.: Susceptibility to additional stressors in metal-tolerant soil microbial communities from two pollution gradients. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 98(Febuary), 233–242 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Shekhovtsova, N.V., Osipov, G.A., Verkhovtseva, N.V., Pevzner, L.A.: Analysis of lipid biomarkers in rocks of the Archean crystalline basement. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4939, pp. 160–168 (2003)Google Scholar
- 18.McCune, B., Grace, J.B.: Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach (2002)Google Scholar
- 19.Seto, K.C., Rodŕıguez, R.Ś., Fragkias, M.: The new geography of contemporary urbanization and the environment. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 167–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Stroganova, M.N., Myagkova, A.D., Prokof’eva, T.V.: The role of soils in urban ecosystems. Eurasian Soil Sci. 30(1), 82–86 (1997)Google Scholar
- 23.Zenova, G.M.: Actinomycetes in biogeocenoses/soil organisms as biogeocenosis components. Science, 162–170 (1984). (in Russian)Google Scholar