Vegetation Indicators of Transformation in the Urban Forest Ecosystems of “Kuzminki-Lyublino” Park
Urban forests usually cover slightly disturbed or natural soils. The morphological structure and dominating species in urban forests are usually like the natural vegetation. These similarities constrain distinguishing between an urban and rural forest without detailed analysis of soil and vegetation properties. Urban forests are exposed to negative city influences, of which air pollution is one of the most substantial. The continuous anthropogenic influences alter the structure of urban forest. This article presents vegetation indicators of changes that occurs in the structure of the forest ecosystems as the response to an anthropogenic impact. The following indicators of forest ecosystem transformation in urban conditions were investigated: (i) reduction of the projective cover of moss layer, until its complete absence (in the pine forest), (ii) increasing the activity of adventive species (Acer negundo L.) in the undergrowth, (iii) high variability of the phyto mass of the ground herbaceous vegetation, and (iv) change in the arial distribution of adventive species of the ground herbaceous vegetation.
KeywordsUrban forest Vegetation indicators Bio indication Protected area
The publication was financially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (the Agreement # 02.A03.21.0008) and by Russian Foundation for Basic Research #15-04-04702, RF.
- 1.Abramova, L.M.: Synantropization of vegetation: patterns and control of the process (case study of Republic of Bashkortostan): abstract of dissertation. Perm State University, 46 p. (2004) (in Rusian)Google Scholar
- 3.Check-list of the vascular flora of the Central Russia. http://www.jcbi.ru/eco1/index.shtml. Accessed 01 Sept 2015
- 4.Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Dull, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W., Paulissen, D.: Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. ScriptaGeobotanica 18, 1–248 (1991)Google Scholar
- 5.ICP IM Manual for integrated monitoring., Compiled by the ICP IM Programme Centre Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland (2010). http://www.syke.fi/en-US/Research__Development/Maintaining_ecosystem_services_and_biodiversity/Monitoring/Integrated_Monitoring/Manual_for_Integrated_Monitoring
- 9.Magurran, A.E.: Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2004). 256 p.Google Scholar
- 10.Pchelkin, A.V., Pchelkina, T.A.: Influence of polluting substances and climatic anomalies on fauna of reptiles and amphibious in the Moscow region The state and environmental pollution review in the Russian Federation for 2011. [Obzorsostoyaniyaizagryazneniyaokruzhayushcheisredy v RossiiskoiFederatsiiza 2011 g. Moscow, pp. 190–192 (2012)Google Scholar
- 11.Emery, M.: Promoting Nature in Cities and Towns: Practical Guide. Croom Helm, London (1986). 396 p.Google Scholar
- 12.Resolution of the Government of Moscow from 10 July 2014, N 394-PP, About basic provisions of new environmental policy of the city of Moscow for the period till 2030 (in Rusian)Google Scholar
- 13.Resolution of the Government of Moscow from 10 09 2002, N 743-ПП Regional Rules for management of urban green areas of Moscow (in Rusian)Google Scholar
- 14.Rysin, L.P., Savel’eva, L.I.: SosnovyelesaRossii [Pine Forests of Russia]. Moscow, 289 p. (2008) (in Rusian)Google Scholar
- 15.United Nations. The millennium development goals report 2008. New York, United Nations (2008). http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Resources/Static/Products/Progress2008/MDG_Report_2008_En.pdf. (2016)