Skip to main content

Common Factors in Psychotherapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Psychiatry

Abstract

Many meta-analyses and research study reviews affirm the comparable effectiveness of psychotherapies in adult patients. This points to common (or core) factors in diverse schools of psychotherapy.

In this chapter, we review the core factors that we believe are fundamentally responsible for transformative change in psychotherapy processes.

These core factors include the therapeutic alliance, empathy, goal consensus and collaboration, positive regard and affirmation, mastery, congruence/genuineness, mentalization and emotional experience. Evidence-based research on common factors has shown that relationship factors in a therapeutic dyad or group setting predict the outcome of psychotherapy, which is related to some of these common factors, and is also found to correlate with improved levels of functioning (Fisher et al. Psychotherapy 53:105–116, 2016). The effectiveness of psychotherapies may rely more on commonalities rather than on differences of theory and technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Addass AA. Bona fide psychotherapy models are equally effective for major depressive disorder future research directions. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(9):893–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Connolly Gibbons MB, Gallop R, Thompson D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of cognitive therapy and dynamic psychotherapy for major depressive disorder in a community mental health setting: a randomized clinical non-inferiority trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(9):904–11. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Driessen E, Hegelmaier LM, Abbass AA, et al. The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: ameba-analysis update. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;42:1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodyer IM, Reynolds S, Barrett B, Byford S, Dubicka B, Hill J, Holland F, Kelvin R, Midgley N, Roberts C, Senior R, Target M, Widmer B, Wilkinson P, Fonagy P. Cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytical psychotherapy versus a brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depressive disorder (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;4(2):109–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30378-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone MH. Management of borderline personality disorder. A review of psychotherapeutic approaches. World Psychiatry. 2006;5:15–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Laska KM, Gurman AS, Wampold BE. Expanding the lens of evidence-based practice in psychotherapy: a common factors perspective. Psychotherapy. 2014;51(4):467–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tschacher W, Haken H, Kyseloz M. Alliance: a common factor of psychotherapy modeled by structural theory. Front Psychol. 2015;6:421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher H, Atzil-Slonim D, Bar-Kalifa E, Rafaeli E, Peri T. Emotional experience and alliance contribute to therapeutic change in psychodynamic therapy. Psychotherapy. 2016;53(1):105–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Symonds D. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy. 2011;48(1):9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hilsenroth MJ. A programmatic study of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: assessment, process, outcome and training. Psychother Res. 2007;17(1):35–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blank G, Blank R. Ego psychology theory and practice. New York: Columbia University Press; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Høoglend P, Amlo S, Marble A, Bøogwald K, Søorbye Ø, Sjaastad MC. Analysis of patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: an experimental study of transference interpretations. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(10):1739–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Preston SD, Hofelich AJ. The many faces of empathy: parsing empathic phenomena through a proximate, dynamic-systems view of representing the other in the self. Emot Rev. 2012;4:24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bridges MR. Activating the corrective emotional experience. J Clin Psychol. 2006;62(5):551–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Diener MJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Weinberger J. Therapist affect focus and patient outcomes in psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(6):936–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sullivan HS. The psychiatric interview. New York: WW Norton & Company; 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCullough L, Kuhn N, Andrews S, Valen J, Hatch D, Osimo F. The reliability of the achievement of therapeutic objectives scale: a research and teaching tool for brief psychotherapy. Journal of Brief Ther. 2004;2(2):72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wampold BE. How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(3):270–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenthal S, Lazare A. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976;162(3):169–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lietaer G. Authenticity, congruence and transparency. In: Brazier D, editor. Beyond Carl Rogers. London: Constable; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers CR. On becoming a person: a therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Greenberg L, Rice L, Elliott R. The moment by moment process: facilitating emotional change. New York: Guilford Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bateman A, Fonagy P. Mentalization-based treatment. Psychoanal Inq. 2013;33(6):595–613.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Nahum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nahum, D., Alfonso, C.A., Sönmez, E. (2019). Common Factors in Psychotherapy. In: Javed, A., Fountoulakis, K. (eds) Advances in Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70554-5_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70554-5_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70553-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70554-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics