Ontology-Based Photogrammetric Survey in Underwater Archaeology

  • Pierre Drap
  • Odile Papini
  • Jean-Chrisophe Sourisseau
  • Timmy Gambin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10577)

Abstract

This work addresses the problem of underwater archaeological surveys from the point of view of knowledge. We propose an approach based on underwater photogrammetry guided by a representation of knowledge used, as structured by ontologies. Survey data feed into to ontologies and photogrammetry in order to produce graphical results. This paper focuses on the use of ontologies during the exploitation of 3D results. JAVA software dedicated to photogrammetry and archaeological survey has been mapped onto an OWL formalism. The use of procedural attachment in a dual representation (JAVA - OWL) of the involved concepts allows us to access computational facilities directly from OWL. As SWRL The use of rules illustrates very well such ‘double formalism’ as well as the use of computational capabilities of ‘rules logical expression’. We present an application that is able to read the ontology populated with a photogrammetric survey data. Once the ontology is read, it is possible to produce a 3D representation of the individuals and observing graphically the results of logical spatial queries on the ontology. This work is done on a very important underwater archaeological site in Malta named Xlendi, probably the most ancient shipwreck of the central Mediterranean Sea.

Keywords

Underwater archaeology Photogrammetry Ontology JAVA 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work is partially done in the framework of the projects GROPLAN (ANR-13-CORD-0014) and ASPIQ (ANR-12-BS02-0003) funded by ANR, the French agency for scientific research.

References

  1. 1.
    Drap, P., Merad, D., Hijazi, B., Gaoua, L., Nawaf, M., Saccone, M., Chemisky, B., Seinturier, J., Sourisseau, J.-C., Gambin, T., Castro, F.: Underwater photogrammetry and object modeling: a case study of xlendi wreck in Malta. Sensors 15(12), 29802 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gergatsoulis, M., Bountouri, L., Gaitanou, P., Papatheodorou, C.: Mapping cultural metadata schemas to CIDOC conceptual reference model, Athens, pp. 321–326 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Niccolucci, F., D’Andrea, A.: An ontology for 3D cultural objects. In: The 7th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roy, S., Yan, M.F.: Method and system for creating owl ontology from java. I.T. Limited, Google Patents (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalyanpur, A., Pastor, D.J., Battle, S., Padget, J.A.: Automatic mapping of OWL ontologies into Java. In: SEKE (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ježek, P., Mouček, R.: Semantic framework for mapping object-oriented model to semantic web languages. Front. Neuroinform. 9, 3 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stevenson, G., Dobson, S.: Sapphire: generating java runtime artefacts from OWL ontologies. In: Salinesi, C., Pastor, O. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNBIP, vol. 83, pp. 425–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22056-2_46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horridge, M., Knublauch, H., Rector, A., Stevens, R., Wroe, C.: A Practical Guide To Building OWL Ontologies Using the Protege-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE Tools. 1.0 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Drap
    • 1
  • Odile Papini
    • 1
  • Jean-Chrisophe Sourisseau
    • 2
  • Timmy Gambin
    • 3
  1. 1.Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, ENSAM, Université De Toulon, LSIS UMR 7296, Domaine Universitaire de Saint-Jérôme, Bâtiment PolytechMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication, CCJ UMR 7299Aix En ProvenceFrance
  3. 3.University of MaltaMsidiMalta

Personalised recommendations