Advertisement

Beckett and Joyce: Two Nattering Nabobs of Negativity

  • Sam Slote
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Modern European Literature book series (PMEL)

Abstract

The ‘Penelope’ episode of Ulysses and the concluding pages of How It Is—two texts bereft of punctuation—are peppered with yeses. In ‘Penelope’, these yeses take the force of punctuation by suggesting logical and syntactic connections between the fragmentary phrases they interpose upon. Through the weight of their accumulation they also suggest—as per Derrida’s argument in ‘Ulysses gramophone’—an affirmation of the very possibility of affirmation. However, such affirmation of affirmation necessarily includes a negative moment. In this, ‘Penelope’ is very close to The Unnamable in that both texts present us with multiple, incommensurable fragments of ratiocination that asymptotically tend towards a silence that never quite comes within the interval of speaking. My essay will argue how the yeses that conclude How It Is ambiguate or intertwine the categories of affirmation and negation and show how affirmation becomes coterminous with denial.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, William Francis. 1904. Heralds of Revolt. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1958. Nouvelles et Textes pour rien. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2013. Ulysses Gramophone: Hear Say Yes in Joyce. Trans. François Raffoul. In Derrida and Joyce: Texts and Contexts, ed. Andrew J. Mitchell and Sam Slote, 41–86. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ellmann, Richard. 1982. James Joyce. New and Revised Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hegel, G.W.F. 1967. Philosophy of Right. Trans. T.M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1991. Uilséas, vol. 12. Trans. Séamas Ó hInnéirghe and Breasal Uilsean. Belfast: Foillseacáin Inis Gleoire.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1993. Ulysses. Ed. Hans Walter Gabler et al. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  9. Moorjani, Angela. 2016. Recollecting Sam-Ness and Watt-Ness. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui 28: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1969. Ecce Homo. In On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. Ed. and Trans. Walter Kaufmann, 199–344. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2013. Joyce’s Nietzschean Ethics. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Hulle, Dirk, and Shane Weller. 2014. The Making of Samuel Beckett’s ‘L’Innommable’/‘The Unnamable’. Brussels and London: University Press Antwerp and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sam Slote
    • 1
  1. 1.Trinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations