Skip to main content

Institutional Change Through Institutionalization: Combining Different Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Institutional Entrepreneurship and Policy Change

Abstract

This chapter aims to contribute to the emerging literature that calls for a bridging of the variants of institutional theory and public policy theory (Bakir, 2009, 2013, Chaps. 2 and 4, 2016) by focusing on historical institutionalism in the political science literature (Mahoney and Thelen, 2010) and organizational institutionalism in the management literature (Lawrence and Suddaby, 2006) with special reference to different processes of institutional change (Mahoney and Thelen, 2010) through the institutionalization conducted in different ways by actors (Lawrence and Suddaby, 2006). Therefore, it is important to note that in this chapter we present a discussion of institutional change by debating the types of institutionalization, and the role of institutional actors in this process, and conclude with a suggestion for an analytical model and a brief initial research agenda. This analytical model is based on the proposal presented by Mahoney and Thelen (2010), and includes the contribution of Lawrence and Suddaby (2006)—specifically, furthering their argument about the type of dominant change agent and how they seek to reconcile elements of agency and context in the analysis of institutional change dynamics. The framework is based on the interconnection between the institutional work and gradual institutional change approaches. Both were developed as alternatives to theoretical perspectives that put too much emphasis on social structure (e.g., path dependence theory) or human agency (e.g., institutional entrepreneurship).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors examined empirical institutional research with the objective of offering an overview of what is understood about institutional work, and what is not, through bibliometric research of empirical papers published since 1990 in three major journals: Administrative Science Quarterly, Academy of Management Journal and Organization Studies.

References

  • Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multi-level governance of central banking reform. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 22(4), 571–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, C. (2013). Bank behaviour and resilience: The effects of structures, institutions and agents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, C. (2016). How can interactions among interdependent structures, institutions, and agents inform financial stability? What we have still to learn from global financial crisis. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9261-1

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leca, B., Battilana, J., & Boxenbaum, E. (2008). Agency and Institutions: A review of institutional entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School Working Paper 08-096. Retrieved from www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/08-096.pdf

  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency and power (pp. 1–37). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1991, Winter). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1992). The Antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1995). Why I am an historical institutionalist. Polity, 5(28), 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economics. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economics (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (2003). How institutionalism evolves: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In J. Mahoney & J. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 208–240). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (orgs.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 1–32). New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (1999). Punctuated-equilibrium theory. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 155–187). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Oliveira Miranda, L., Calmon, P.C.D.P. (2018). Institutional Change Through Institutionalization: Combining Different Approaches. In: Bakir, C., Jarvis, D. (eds) Institutional Entrepreneurship and Policy Change. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70350-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics