Advertisement

Outsourcing 2.0: Towards an Innovation-Driven Process Model for Client-Vendor Relationships in Information Technology Outsourcing

  • Robert Linden
  • Nikolaus Schmidt
  • Christoph Rosenkranz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 306)

Abstract

While most ITO deals focused on cost-reduction through outsourcing of already matured services, tasks and systems, many ITO engagements are moving into new directions – the joint identification and exploiting of innovative, IT-based ideas to generate additional value for the organization and strengthen its market competitiveness. This paper proposes to investigate how the client-vendor relationship need to be modelled, structured, and managed to foster innovations within ITO. To answer our research questions, we conducted an explorative field study by interviewing 16 ITO experts from both client and vendor organizations. Our research results in an enhanced client-vendor relationship process model consisting of five process steps as well as corresponding categories describing management actions focusing on innovation generation within ITO client-vendor relationships. The contribution of our study is the development of an innovation-focused model for managing such relationships and the extension of our understanding of ITO management in times of increased digital innovation.

Keywords

Information technology outsourcing Innovation Innovation through outsourcing Client-Vendor relationship Process model 

References

  1. 1.
    Gartner, I.: Forecast: IT Services, Worldwide, 2013–2019, 2Q15 Update. IT Services Worldwide (2015). https://www.gartner.com/doc/3075522. Accessed 25 Nov 2015
  2. 2.
    Lacity, M.C., Khan, S.A., Yan, A.: Review of the empirical business services sourcing literature: an update and future directions. J. Inf. Technol. (2016). doi: 10.1057/jit.2016.2
  3. 3.
    Gartner, I.: Forecast: IT Services, Worldwide, 2014–2020, 3Q16 Update. IT Services Worldwide (2016). https://www.gartner.com/doc/3352451/. Accessed 10 Nov 2016
  4. 4.
    Gartner, I.: Sourcing Strategy Imperatives for 2011: Deliver High Business Value, Leverage Low-Cost IT Services (2012). http://www.gartner.com/id=1537314. Accessed 27 Nov 2015
  5. 5.
    Loch, C.H., DeMeyer, A., Pich, M.: Managing the Unknown: A New Approach to Managing High Uncertainty and Risk in Projects. Wiley, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bloomberg: Google Teams With GM, Honda, and Audi to Bring Android to Cars (2014). https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-01-06/google-teams-with-gm-honda-and-audi-to-bring-android-to-cars. Accessed 07 Dec 2016
  7. 7.
    Audi: Google Teams With GM, Honda, and Audi to Bring Android to Cars (2014). https://www.audiusa.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/2014/01/new-roads-ahead-android-open-automotive-alliance. Accessed 07 Dec 2016
  8. 8.
    Ang, S., Straub, D.W.: Production and transaction economies and is outsourcing: a study of the us banking industry. MIS Q. 535–552 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levina, N., Ross, J.W.: From the vendor’s perspective: exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Q. 331–364 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pannirselvam, G.P., Madupalli, R.: Antecedents of project success: the perception of vendor employees. Q. Manag. J. 18(3), 7–20 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J.: Innovation in outsourcing. a study on client expectations and commitment (2011). Warwick Business School and Rotterdam School of ManagementGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heiskanen, A., Newman, M., Eklin, M.: Control, trust, power, and the dynamics of information system outsourcing relationships: a process study of contractual software development. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 17(4), 268–286 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gopal, A., Koka, B.R.: The asymmetric benefits of relational flexibility: evidence from software development outsourcing. MIS Q. 36(2), 553–576 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kern, T., Willcocks, L.: Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships: theory and practice. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 9(4), 321–350 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, J.-N., Kim, Y.-G.: Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: conceptual framework and empirical validation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 15, 29–61 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kern, T.: The Gestalt of an information technology outsourcing relationship: an exploratory analysis. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goles, T., Chin, W.W.: Information systems outsourcing relationship factors: detailed conceptualization and initial evidence. ACM SIGMIS Database 36(4), 47–67 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kern, T., Willcocks, L.: Exploring relationships in information technology outsourcing: the interaction approach. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 11(1), 3–19 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., Gerbasi, A.: Strategic innovation through outsourcing: the role of relational and contractual governance. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 203–216 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lacity, M.C., et al.: A review of the IT outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions. J. Inf. Technol. 25(4), 395–433 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weeks, M.R., Feeny, D.: Outsourcing: From cost management to innovation and business value. Calif. Manag. Rev. 50(4), 127–146 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chengxun, T., Siew Kien, S.: Managing flexibility in outsourcing. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7(4), 179–205 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jin Kim, H., Shin, B., Lee, H.: The mediating role of psychological contract breach in IS outsourcing: inter-firm governance perspective. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(5), 529–547 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D.: Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(1), 273–292 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Williamson, O.E.: The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Simon and Schuster, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rustagi, S., King, W.R., Kirsch, L.J.: Predictors of formal control usage in IT outsourcing partnerships. Inf. Syst. Res. 19(2), 126–143 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Blumenberg, S., Beimborn, D., Koenig, W.: Determinants of IT outsourcing relationships: a conceptual model. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H., Oh, S.: Developing buyer-seller relationships. J. Mark. 11–27 (1987)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alborz, S., Seddon, P., Scheepers, R.: A model for studying IT outsourcing relationships. In: PACIS 2003 Proceedings, p. 90 (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Håkansson, H., IMP Group: International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach. Wiley, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goo, J., et al.: The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: an empirical study. MIS Q. 33(1), 119–145 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fjermestad, J., Saitta, J.A.: A strategic management framework for IT outsourcing: a review of the literature and the development of a success factors model. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 7(3), 42–60 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gregory, R.W., Beck, R., Keil, M.: Control balancing in information systems development offshoring projects. MIS Q. 37(4), 1211–1232 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koh, C., Ang, S., Straub, D.W.: IT outsourcing success: a psychological contract perspective. Inf. Syst. Res. 15(4), 356–373 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zimmermann, A., Ravishankar, M.: Knowledge transfer in IT offshoring relationships: the roles of social capital, efficacy and outcome expectations. Inf. Syst. J. 24(2), 167–202 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Søderberg, A.-M., Krishna, S., Bjørn, P.: Global software development: commitment, trust and cultural sensitivity in strategic partnerships. J. Int. Manag. 19(4), 347–361 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Paravastu, N.: Effect of trust and risk on IT outsourcing relationship quality and outsourcing success. Drexel University (2007)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Galbraith, J., Downey, D., Kates, A.: Designing dynamic organizations: a hands-on guide for leaders at all levels. In: AMACOM Division of the American Management Association (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    ISO: International Standard 37500 “Guidance on Outsourcing”. International Standards Organization. Geneva (2014)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hoecht, A., Trott, P.: Innovation risks of strategic outsourcing. Technovation 26(5), 672–681 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Loh, L., Venkatraman, N.: Diffusion of information technology outsourcing: influence sources and the Kodak effect. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(4), 334–358 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liang, H., et al.: IT outsourcing research from 1992 to 2013: a literature review based on main path analysis. Inf. Manag. (2015)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kotlarsky, J., et al.: Editorial: Understanding strategic innovation in IT and business process outsourcing. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. (2015)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tushman, M.L.: Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Adm. Sci. Q. 22(4), 587–605 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gassmann, O.: Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Manag. 36(3), 223–228 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 26(2), 13–23 (2002)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldaña, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Guest, G., Bunce, A., Johnson, L.: How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods 18(1), 59–82 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Whitley, E.A., Willcocks, L.: Achieving step-change in outsourcing maturity: toward collaborative innovation. MIS Q. Executive 10(3), 95–107 (2011)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Westerman, G., Curley, M.: Building IT-enabled innovation capabilities at Intel. MIS Q. Executive 7(1), 33–48 (2008)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cui, Z., Loch, C.: A strategic decision framework for innovation outsourcing. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 15(05), 899–930 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Quinn, J.B.: Outsourcing Innovation: The New Engine of Growth. Sloan Management Review (2000)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Calantone, R.J., Stanko, M.A.: Drivers of outsourced innovation: an exploratory study. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 24(3), 230–241 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bandyopadhyay, S., Pathak, P.: Knowledge sharing and cooperation in outsourcing projects—a game theoretic analysis. Decis. Support Syst. 43(2), 349–358 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kimble, C., Grenier, C., Goglio-Primard, K.: Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: political interplay between boundary objects and brokers. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 30(5), 437–444 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Willcocks, L.: The next step for the CEO: moving IT-enabled services outsourcing to the strategic agenda. Strateg. Outsourcing Int. J. 3(1), 62–66 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Patrakosol, B., Olson, D.L.: How interfirm collaboration benefits IT innovation. Inf. Manag. 44(1), 53–62 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gopal, A., Koka, B.R.: The role of contracts on quality and returns to quality in offshore software development outsourcing. Decis. Sci. 41(3), 491–516 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schermann, M., et al.: The role of transaction cost economics in information technology outsourcing research: a meta-analysis of the choice of contract type. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 32–48 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Carlo, J.L., Lyytinen, K., Rose, G.M.: A knowledge-based model of radical innovation in small software firms. MIS Q. 36(3), 865–869 (2012)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Panteli, N., Sockalingam, S.: Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizational alliances: a framework for facilitating knowledge sharing. Decis. Support Syst. 39(4), 599–617 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Park, J.Y., Im, K.S., Kim, J.S.: The role of IT human capability in the knowledge transfer process in IT outsourcing context. Inf. Manag. 48(1), 53–61 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Boehm, A.-L., et al.: Innovate on purpose–factors contributing to innovation in IT outsourcing. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    López-Nicolás, C., Meroño-Cerdán, Á.L.: Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 31(6), 502–509 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Linden
    • 1
  • Nikolaus Schmidt
    • 1
  • Christoph Rosenkranz
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations