Advertisement

Conceptualizing ICT-Enabled Co-creation of Public Value

  • Aelita Skaržauskienė
  • Monika Mačiulienė
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10673)

Abstract

Traditional views on the public value creation focus on the public sector organizations as sole initiators of the value creation processes. The rise of interactive Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), however, opens new opportunities for broader engagement of civic stakeholders in the public value generation. The concept of co-creation is seen as a new framework describing the shift from considering organizations as the definers of the value to a more inclusive and collaborative processes involving the end-users and other external actors. The article proposes a conceptual framework providing holistic integration of current research efforts on the co-creation of public value by focusing on the initiatives originating outside governmental entities. The conceptual framework provides understanding on how ICT-enabled co-creation should be utilized in the generation of the public value.

Keywords

Public value Co-creation ICT 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research (C3PLACES - using ICT for Co-creation of Inclusive Public Places) was funded by a grant (No. 7135959) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

References

  1. 1.
    Akaka, M.A., Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: The complexity of context: a service ecosystems approach for international marketing. J. Int. Mark. Am. Mark. Assoc. 21(4), 1–20 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gronroos, C.: Value co-creation in service logic: a critical analysis. Mark. Theory 11, 279–301 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hänninen, H.: Management of Value Co-creation in Public Service Networks - Case City of Helsinki, p. 99 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wise, S., Paton, R.A., Gegenhuber, T.: Value co-creation through collective intelligence in the public sector: a review of US and European initiatives. Vine 42(2), 251–276 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., Akaka, M.A.: Advancing service science with service-dominant logic: clarifications and conceptual development stephen. In: Maglio, P., Kieliszewski, C., Spohrer, J. (eds.) Handbook of Service Science. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy, pp. 133–156. Springer, Boston (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1628-0_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vargo, S.L., Akaka, M.A.: Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: clarifications. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 32–41 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Reilly, T.: Government as a platform. Innovations 6(1), 13–40 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Commission: Consultation on directions for ICT-driven public sector innovation at European Union level Research and innovation in Horizon 2020 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moore, M.H.: Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, p. 402. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Denhardt, J.V., Denhardt, R.B.: The new public service revisited. Public Adm. Rev. 75(October), 664–672 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., Nasi, G.: A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 43(2), 135–158 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leavy, B.: Collaborative innovation as the new imperative–design thinking, value co-creation and the power of ‘pull’. Strateg. Leadersh. 40(2), 25–34 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Allio, L.: Design Thinking for Public Service Excellence (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown, B.T., Wyatt, J.: Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev. Winter(Winter), 30–35 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gatautis, R.: Creating public value through eparticipation: wave project. Ekon. ir Vadyb 15, 483–490 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peixoto, T., Fall, M., Sjoberg, F.: Evaluating Digital Citizen Engagement: A Practical Guide. The World Bank, Washington, D.C (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giest, S., Koene, A., Vallejos, E.P., Pitkänen, O., Fosci, M.: Online spaces for urban citizen engagement: a comparison of civic apps. In: Data for Policy Conference, pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rumbul, R.: Developing transparency through digital means? Examining institutional responses to civic technology in Latin America. JeDEM 8(3), 12–31 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Magno, F., Cassia, F.: “Public administrators’ engagement in services co-creation: factors that foster and hinder organisational learning about citizens. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell, pp. 1–12. January 2014 2015Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sherriff, L.: Sensing the future: how will smart city principles and technology enable citizen co-creation in public policy-making, consent processing and service provision? In: 2015 Conference on Back to the Future, New Zealand Planning Institute, pp. 1–15 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hilgers, D., Ihl, C.: Citizensourcing: applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. Int. J. Public Particip. 4(1), 67–88 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cabrera, A.B.: New Public Governance, Co-production & Third Sector Social Services, pp. 1–23. October 2010Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kannan, P.K., Chang, A.-M.: Beyond citizen engagement: involving the public in co-delivering government services. Collab. Across Boundaries IBM Cent. Bus. Gov. Washingtn, D.C (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suri, M.V.: From crowdsourcing potholes to community policing: applying interoperability theory to analyze the expansion of ‘Open311’. Berkman Cent. Res. Publ. No. 2013–2018 7641, 1–19 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rumbul, R.: ICT and citizen efficacy: the role of civic technology in facilitating government accountability and citizen confidence. IFIP Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol. 481, 213–222 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    AVINA Foundation: Civic technologies as tools for change: is balance between online and offline actions a necessary condition for achieving social change through civic innovation? (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Knight Foundation: The Emergence of Civic Tech: Investments in a Growing Field, p. 30. December 2013Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baeck, P., Bria, F.: Digital Social Innovation: What It Is And What We Are Doing, London (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marian, D., Monteyne, D.: Urban co-creation: envisioning new digital tools for activism and experimentation in the city. Chi 2011, 1–4 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M.A.: On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 26, 145–152 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Frow, P., Payne, A.: A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. Eur. J. Mark. 45(1/2), 223–240 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L.: Service-dominant logic: a necessary step. Eur. J. Mark. 45(7/8), 1298–1309 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kearns, I.: Public Value and E-Government. Institute for Public Policy Research, London (2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    McGee, R., Gaventa, J., Barrett, G., Calland, R., Carlitz, R., Joshi, A., Acosta, A.M.: Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives: Synthesis Report (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Akaka, M.A., Chandler, J.D.: Roles as resources: a social roles perspective of change in value networks. Mark. Theory 11(3), 243–260 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sekulova, F.: WP3: Analysis of success factors Report on qualitative success factors (2016)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Capgemini, Sogeti: Digitizing Public Services in Europe: Putting Ambition into Action (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Åkesson, M.: Role constellations in value co-creation: a study of resource integration in an e-government context (2011)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L.: Co-creation in social innovation: comparative case-study on the influential factors and outcomes of co-creation. Lipse 320090(320090), 1–31 (2014)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Magno, F., Cassia, F.: Public administrators’ engagement in services co-creation: factors that foster and hinder organisational learning about citizens. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 26(11–12), 1161–1172 (2014)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cobo, C.: Networks for citizen consultation and citizen sourcing of expertise. Contemp. Soc. Sci. 7(3), 283–304 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Badger, E.: The next big start-up wave: civic technology (2012). http://www.citylab.com/tech/2012/06/next-big-start-wave-civic-technology/2265/. [Accessed: 14 May 2017]
  43. 43.
    Cook, M.: Delivering public value through transparency. In: Burke, W.M., Teller, M. (eds.) A Guide to Owning Transparency: How Federal Agencies Can Implement and Benefit from Transparency, pp. 16–21. Open Forum Foundation (2011)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    den Ouden, E.: Innovation Design: Creating Value for People, Organizations and Society. Springer Science & Business Media, London (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Clarke, R.Y.: Civic Tech Fuels U.S. State and Local Government Transformation (2014). http://www.accela.com/images/resources/whitepaper/idc-civic-tech-report.pdf
  46. 46.
    Sifry, M. L.: Civic Tech and Engagement: In Search of a Common Language (2014). http://techpresident.com/news/25261/civic-tech-and-engagement-search-common-language. Accessed 7 June 2016
  47. 47.
    Nambisan, S., Nambisan, P.: Engaging Citizens in Co-Creation in Public Services - Lessons Learned and Best Practices. Collaboration Across Boundaries Series (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mykolas Romeris UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations