Advertisement

The Architecture of Creative Learning Environments

  • Punya Mishra
  • Danah Henriksen
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology book series (BRIEFSECT)

Abstract

Learning environments are highly influential on creative processes, and many educational psychologists have suggested that environments have the power to make or break the creative potential of students. A learning environment designed to support creativity offers opportunities for divergent thinking and innovative solutions, with an overall atmosphere that fosters communication, collaboration, and risk-taking. The SCALE (Support for Creativity in a Learning Environment) is an evaluation instrument designed to evaluate the creative potential of learning environments. SCALE was created based on an extensive literature review, classroom observations, and administrator/educator/researcher collaborative design and consists of 14 items in three categories that were identified as foundational to supporting student creativity: Learner Engagement, Physical Environment, and Learning Climate. We hope that SCALE and other such instruments can allow for the identification and development of environments more suited for creativity.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Candy, P. C. (2004). Linking thinking. Self-directed learning in the digital age. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/research/publications/linking_thinking/default.htm.Google Scholar
  3. Caper, R. (1996). Play, experimentation and creativity. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 77, 859–869.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cress, S. W., & Holm, D. T. (2016). Creative endeavors: Inspiring creativity in a first grade classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(3), 235–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0704-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cropley, A. J. (2003). Creativity in education & learning. Bodmin, Cornwall: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  7. Eckhoff, A. (2011). Creativity in the early childhood classroom: Perspectives of preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32(3), 240–255.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2011.594486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer, G., & Scharff, E. (1998). Learning technologies in support of self-directed learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98(4), 1–32.Google Scholar
  9. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Forrester, V., & Hui, A. (2007). Creativity in the Hong Kong classroom: What is the contextual practice? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 30–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freedman, K. (2007). Artmaking/troublemaking: Creativity, policy, and leadership in art education. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 48(2), 204–217.Google Scholar
  12. Fusarelli, L. D. (2004). The potential impact of the no child left behind act on equity and diversity in American education. Educational Policy, 18, 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giroux, H. A., & Schmidt, M. (2004). Closing the achievement gap: A metaphor for children left behind. Journal of Educational Change, 5, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
  15. Jerald, C. D. (2009). Center for Public Education. Defining a 21st century education. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Learn-About/21st-Century/Defining-a-21st-CenturyEducaion-Full-Report-PDF.pdf
  16. Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., & The Deep-Play Research Group. (2012). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century: On being in-disciplined. TechTrends, 56(6), 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the tpack framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 11(2), 22–28.Google Scholar
  18. Olivant, K. F. (2015). “I am not a format”: Teachers’ experiences with fostering creativity in the era of accountability. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 29(1), 115–129.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2014.978920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2004). Skills framework. From: http://www.21stcenturyskills.org
  20. Peppler, K. A., & Solomou, M. (2011). Building creativity: Collaborative learning and creativity in social media environments. On the Horizon, 19(1), 13–23.  https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111107672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pink, D. H. (2005). A whole new mind. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  22. Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  23. Robinson, K. (2003). Mind the gap: The creative conundrum. Critical Quarterly, 43(1), 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds. West Sussex: Capstone Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1996). The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In A. I. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 49–82). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2003). The art of innovation: Polymaths and the universality of the creative process. In L. Shavanina (Ed.), International handbook of innovation (pp. 267–278). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  28. Sawyer, K. (2015). A call to action: The challenges of creative teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 117, 100303.Google Scholar
  29. Wagner, T. (2010). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need--and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Warner, S. A., & Myers, K. L. (2009). The creative classroom: The role of space and place toward facilitating creativity. The Technology Teacher, 69(4), 28–34.Google Scholar
  31. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AECT 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Punya Mishra
    • 1
  • Danah Henriksen
    • 1
  1. 1.Mary Lou Fulton Teachers CollegeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations