Advertisement

Fable in The World and the Discourse

Chapter
  • 203 Downloads

Abstract

The question of how to begin, how to inaugurate a new form, style, or path of thinking opened Descartes onto the fable. Because so much concerning his metaphysical and epistemological claims hinge on methodological problems in the very inauguration of the how and why of what is learned, a defense of his new form or style of thinking cannot itself develop through that methodology. As a result, Descartes deviates from the course of thinking not precisely by defending his new form, style, or path, but by setting it to work it such that it may defend itself in its operation. This change in course occurs through Descartes’ telling us that a given text is a fable, a literary form associated with pedagogical goals.

Keywords

wordsWords facultyFaculty matterMatter chaosChaos orderOrder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1980. Physics. Translated by Hippocrates G. Apostle. Grinnell, IA: The Peripatetic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cavaillé, Jean-Pierre. 1991. Descartes: La Fable du Monde. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  3. De Salluste du Bartas, Guillaume. 1981. La Sepmaine; ou, Creation du Monde. Edited by Yvonne Bellenger. Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
  4. Deleuze, Gilles. 1990. Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. Translated by Martin Joughin. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, Jacques. 2009. The Beast and the Sovereign, Volume I. Edited by Michel Lisse, Marie-Louise Mallet, and Ginette Michaud and translated by Geoffrey Bennington. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dunn, Kevin. 1991. “‘A Great City Is a Great Solitude’: Descartes’s Urban Pastoral.” Yale French Studies 80: 93–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2930263.
  7. Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gilson, Étienne. 1947. Commentaire Historique. In René Descartes, Discours de la Méthode: Texte et Commentaire par Étienne Gilson, 79–477. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1964. Index Scolastico-Cartésien. New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, Edmund. 1999. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorion Cairns. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Macbeth, Danielle. 2004. “Viète, Descartes, and the Emergence of Modern Mathematics.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25 (2): 87–117. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj200425212.
  12. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1977. Annotations. In René Descartes, Règles Utiles et Claires pour la Direction de l’Esprit en la Recherche de la Vérité, translated by Jean-Luc Marion, conceptual notes by Jean-Luc Marion, and mathematical notes by Pierre Costabel, 83–294. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1999. On Descartes’ Metaphysical Prism: The Constitution and the Limits of Onto-theo-logy in Cartesian Thought. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2007. “The Responsorial Status of the Meditations.” In On the Ego and on God: Further Cartesian Questions, translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner, 30–41. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Maull, Nancy L. 1978. “Cartesian Optics and the Geometrization of Nature.” Review of Metaphysics 32 (2): 253–273. https://doi.org/revmetaph1978322132.
  16. Morin, Marie-Eve. 2012. Jean-Luc Nancy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1978. “Mundus Est Fabula.” Translated by Daniel A. Brewer. MLN 93 (4): 635–653. https://doi.org/10.2307/2906598.
  18. ———. 1979. Ego Sum. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  19. Newton, Sir Isaac. 1846. Newton’s Principia: The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by Andrew Motte. New York: Daniel Addee.Google Scholar
  20. Prendergast, Thomas L. 1975. “Motion, Action, and Tendency in Descartes’ Physics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (4): 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.0516.
  21. Ribe, Neil M. 1997. “Cartesian Optics and the Mastery of Nature.” Isis 88 (1): 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/383626.
  22. Spinoza, Benedictus. 1961. The Principles of Descartes’ Philosophy. Translated by Halbert Hans Britan. La Salle, IL: The Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  23. Stewart, William McC. 1938. Descartes and Poetry. The Romanic Review 29 (3): 212–242. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/inu.30000097436673
  24. Temple, Robert. 1998. Introduction. In Aesop, The Complete Fables, translated by Olivia and Robert Temple, ix–xxiii. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  25. Verene, Donald Phillip. 2006. “Philosophical Aesthetics.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 40 (4): 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1353/jae.2006.0038.
  26. Vermeulen, Corinna Lucia. 2007. René Descartes, Specimina Philosophiae. Introduction and Critical Edition. Ph.D. diss. Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  27. Vidricaire, André. 1988. “La vision comme procédé de communications dans le Discours de la Méthode.” Philosophiques 15 (1): 95–105. https://doi.org/10.7202/027037ar.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bratislava International School of Liberal ArtsBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations