Robustness of Selective Desensitization Perceptron Against Irrelevant and Partially Relevant Features in Pattern Classification

  • Tomohiro Tanno
  • Kazumasa Horie
  • Jun Izawa
  • Masahiko Morita
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10639)


Recent practical studies have shown that a selective desensitization neural network (SDNN) is a high-performance function approximator that is robust against redundant input dimensions. This paper examined the classification performance of a single-output-SDNN, which we refer to as a selective desensitization perceptron (SDP), through a numerical experiment on binary classification problems that include some irrelevant features and partially relevant features and compared these results with multilayer perceptron (MLP) and support vector machine (SVM) classification methods. The results show that SDP was highly effective not only in dealing with irrelevant features but also in a dataset including a partially relevant feature, which is irrelevant in most of the domain but affects the output in a specific domain. These results indicate that the previously observed SDNN’s high-performance in the practical problems might be originated from the fact that SDP does not require a precise feature selection with taking account of the various degrees of feature relevance.


Binary classification Selective desensitization perceptron Irrelevant feature Partially relevant feature 


  1. 1.
    Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2(3), 27:1–27:27 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weston, J., Mukherjee, S., Chapelle, O., Pontil, M., Poggio, T., Vapnik, V.: Feature selection for SVMs. In: Leen, T.K., Dietterich, T.G., Tresp, V. (eds.) NIPS 2000. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 13, pp. 647–653. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A.: An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(May), 1157–1182 (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gasca, E., Sanchez, J.S., Alonso, R.: Eliminating redundancy and irrelevance using a new MLP-based feature selection method. Pattern Recogn. 39(2), 313–315 (2006)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kobayashi, T., Shibuya, T., Morita, M.: Q-learning in continuous state-action space with noisy and redundant inputs by using a selective desensitization neural network. J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. 19(6), 825–832 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nonaka, K., Tanaka, F., Morita, M.: Empirical comparison of feedforward neural network on two-variable function approximation. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. J. 94(12), 2114–2125 (2011). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawata, H., Tanaka, F., Suemitsu, A., Morita, M.: Practical surface EMG pattern classification by using a selective desensitization neural network. In: Wong, K.W., Mendis, B.S.U., Bouzerdoum, A. (eds.) ICONIP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6444, pp. 42–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-17534-3_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horie, K., Suemitsu, A., Morita, M.: Direct estimation of hand motion speed from surface electromyograms using a selective desensitization neural network. J. Sig. Process. 18(4), 225–228 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomohiro Tanno
    • 1
  • Kazumasa Horie
    • 1
  • Jun Izawa
    • 1
  • Masahiko Morita
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TsukubaTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations