A Compliance Control Strategy for Minimizing Base Attitude Disturbance Using Variable Stiffness Joint Space Manipulator

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10639)

Abstract

The base attitude of a free-floating space robot is disturbed during capturing targets. Based on the variable stiffness technology, this paper presents a compliance control strategy for minimizing the base attitude disturbance. Firstly, the dynamic model of space manipulator system is established by using the Lagrange equation. Secondly, the differential evolution algorithm is utilized to design the control strategy of variable stiffness joint space manipulator. The simulation results reflect that the influence introduced by impact is obviously reduced, which verify the effectiveness of the control strategy.

Keywords

Minimize disturbance Space manipulator Variable stiffness Differential evolution 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by Scientific and Technological Innovation Projects of General Armament Department under grant No. ZYX12010001 and National Key Basic Research Program of China under grant No. 2013CB733000.

References

  1. 1.
    Flores-Abad, A., Ma, O., Pham, K., et al.: A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 68(8), 1–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu, J.W., Shi, S.C., Liu, H., Cai, H.G.: Spacecraft attitude disturbance optimization of space robot in target capturing process. Robot 33, 16–22 (2011). ChinaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoshida, K., Sashida, N., Kurazume, R., et al.: Modeling of collision dynamics for space free-floating links with extended generalized inertia tensor. In: Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automations, pp. 899–904, France (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoshida, K., Sashida, N.: Modeling of impact dynamics and impulse minimization for space robots. In: Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 1993, IROS 1993. pp. 2064–2069. Yokohama, Japan (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nenchev, D.N., Yoshida, K.: Impact analysis and post-impact motion control issues of a free-floating space robot subject to a force impulse. IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat. 15(3), 548–557 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nenchev, D.N., Yoshida, K.: Utilization of the bias momentum approach for capturing a tumbling satellite. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3333–3338. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dimitrov, D.N., Yoshida, K.: Momentum distribution in a space manipulator for facilitating the post-impact control. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 4, pp. 3345–3350. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shui, H.T., Li, X., Peng, S.J., et al.: Zero disturbance planning for space robots during target capture. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, Xiamen, China, pp. 471–475 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, L., Jia, Q.X., Chen, G.: Pre-impact trajectory planning for minimizing base attitude disturbance in space manipulator systems for a capture task. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 28(4), 1199–1208 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dong, Q.H., Chen, L.: Neural network stabilization control of space mainipulator capturing operation. Huangzhong Univ. Sci. Tech. 43(3), 22–27 (2015). ChinaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsagarakis, N.G., Sardellitti, I., Caldwell, D.G.: A new variable stiffness actuator (CompAct-VSA): Design and modelling. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 378–383. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dorronsoro, B., Bouvry, P.: Cellular genetic algorithms without additional parameters. J. Supercomput. 63(3), 156–162 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qin, A.K., Huang, V.L., Suganthan, P.N.: Differential evolution algorithm with strategy adaptation for global numerical optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13(2), 656–665 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AutomationBeijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Information EquipmentAcademy of EquipmentBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations