Smart Mobility, the Role of Mobile Games

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10622)

Abstract

Cities are increasingly making accommodations for increasing bicycle use as one of the smart city strategies on mobility planning. Our study addresses the use of mobile applications (apps) to incentivize the increased use of cycling for commuting to work/study, we conducted a survey to identify trends and gaps in smart mobility research, especially on urban cycling promotion through mobile devices and games supported by geospatial analysis. The analysis of 140 publications, provided insights from the smart mobility concept like the constant support of mobile devices and location-based services on this research field as well as a strong bias towards experiments and a few theoretical reviews, the frequent use of intrinsic motivation when designing games, and customised platforms for experimenting instead of commercial applications. Finally, the lack of integration between game narratives and the capabilities of geospatial analysis is considered the biggest research challenge for game designers and smart city advocates.

Keywords

Serious games Gamification Urban cycling Geospatial 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Authors of this document gratefully acknowledge funding from the European Union through the GEO-C project (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2014, Grant Agreement Number 642332, http://www.geo-c.eu/).

References

  1. 1.
    Armoogum, J., Dill, J.: Workshop synthesis: sampling issues, data quality & data protection. Transp. Res. Procedia 11, 60–65 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.006. ISSN 23521465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barratt, P.: Healthy competition: a qualitative study investigating persuasive technologies and the gamification of cycling. Health Place 46, 328–336 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.09.009. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1353829216301903. ISSN 13538292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basiri, A., Amirian, P., Mooney, P.: Using crowdsourced trajectories for automated OSM data entry approach. Sensors 16(9), 1510 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16091510. http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/16/9/1510. ISSN 1424-8220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellotti, F., et al.: A smart mobility serious game concept and business development study. In: de De Gloria, A., Veltkamp, R. (eds.) GALA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9599, pp. 385–392. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40216-1_43 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berger, M., Platzer, M.: Field evaluation of the smartphone-based travel behaviour data collection app SmartMo. Transp. Res. Procedia 11, 263–279 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.023. ISSN 23521465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berri, A., Daziano, R.: Workshop synthesis: caring for the environment. Transp. Res. Procedia 11, 413–421 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.034. ISSN 23521465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bleser, G., Steffen, D., Reiss, A., Weber, M., Hendeby, G., Fradet, L.: Personalized physical activity monitoring using wearable sensors. In: Holzinger, A., Röcker, C., Ziefle, M. (eds.) Smart Health. LNCS, vol. 8700, pp. 99–124. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16226-3_5 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boticki, I., et al.: Usage of a mobile social learning platform with virtual badges in a primary school. Comput. Educ. 86, 120–136 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.015. ISSN 03601315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    te Brömmelstroet, M.: Sometimes you want people to make the right choices for the right reasons: potential perversity and jeopardy of behavioural change campaigns in the mobility domain. J. Transp. Geogr. 39, 141–144 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.001. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0966692314001495. ISSN 09666923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castellanos, S.: Delivering modal-shift incentives by using gamification and smartphones: a field study example in Bogota. Colombia. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 4(4), 269–278 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2016.08.008. ISSN 2213624XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Claudel, M., Nagel, T., Ratti, C.: From origins to destinations: the past, present and future of visualizing flow maps. Built Environ. 42(3), 200 (2015). http://www.alexandrinepress.co.uk/Announcing-Big-Data-Issue Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Degbelo, A., et al.: Opening up smart cities: citizen-centric challenges and opportunities from GIScience. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 5(2), 16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5020016. http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/5/2/16. ISSN 2220-9964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duarte, L., Carriço, L.: Designing for geo-referenced in-situ therapeutic scenarios. Inf. Syst. Front. 18(1), 103–123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9576-z. ISSN 15729419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dutz, T., Hardy, S., Knöll, M., Göbel, S., Steinmetz, R.: User interfaces of mobile exergames. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8512, pp. 244–255. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07227-2_24 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    El Bastawisy, M., Reichardt, D., Abdennadher, S.: Towards a human machine interface concept for performance improvement of cycling. In: Bottino, R., Jeuring, J., Veltkamp, R.C. (eds.) GALA 2016. LNCS, vol. 10056, pp. 425–434. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50182-6_39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Handy, S., van Wee, B., Kroesen, M.: Promoting cycling for transport: research needs and challenges. Transp. Rev. 34(1), 4–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.860204. http://www.tandfonline.com. ISSN 0144-1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huotari, K., Hamari, J.: Defining gamification. In: Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference on - MindTrek 2012, p. 17. ACM Press, New York, October 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2393132.2393137. ISBN 9781450316378
  18. 18.
    Ijaz, K., et al.: Competitive vs affiliative design of immersive VR exergames. In: JCSG 2016, pp. 140–150 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45841-0_13. http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/1337/gamification-game-based-learning-seriousgames-any-difference%20. ISBN 978-0-8191-6148-2
  19. 19.
    easyMOBIZ mobile IT solutions. SmartMo (2017). http://easymobiz.com
  20. 20.
    Leibetseder, A., Lux, M.: Gamifying fitness or fitnessifying games: a comparative study. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1642, pp. 37–44 (2016). ISSN 16130073Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacDonald, E.A., et al.: Aurorasaurus: a citizen science platform for viewing and reporting the aurora. Space Weather 13(9), 548–559 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/2015SW001214. ISSN 15427390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martinez Tabares, C.: Individual factors related to utilitarian urban cycling: representations, motivations and perceived aggression. PhD thesis. Université Paris VIII-Vincennes-Saint-Denis (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matallaoui, A., Hanner, N., Zarnekow, R.: Introduction to gamification: foundation and underlying theories. In: Stieglitz, S., Lattemann, C., Robra-Bissantz, S., Zarnekow, R., Brockmann, T. (eds.) Gamification. PI, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45557-0_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McHugh, R., Bilous, R., Grant, C., Hammersley, L.: PACE at a glance: case studies of the student experience. In: Sachs, J., Clark, L. (eds.) Learning Through Community Engagement, pp. 153–169. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0999-0_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meloni, I., di Teulada, B.S.: I-pet individual persuasive eco-travel technology: a tool for VTBC program implementation. Transp. Res. Procedia 11, 422–433 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.035. ISSN 23521465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miller, H.J.: Time geography and space-time prism. In: International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology, pp. 1–19. Wiley, Oxford, March 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0431. https://u.osu.edu/miller.81/files/2017/03/Miller-time-geography-and-space-time-prism-1rp3u1q.pdf%20
  27. 27.
    Navarro, K.F., et al.: SocialCycle: what can a mobile app do to encourage cycling? In: Proceedings - Conference on Local Computer Networks, LCN, pp. 24–30 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/LCNW.2013.6758494
  28. 28.
    O’Grady, M.J., et al.: Intelligent sensing for citizen science. Mob. Netw. Appl. 21(2), 375–385 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036- 016- 0682-z. ISSN 1383-469XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oldenziel, R., et al.: Cycling Cities: The European Experience. Eindhoven: Foundation for the History of Technology, Rachel Carson Center for Environment, and Society, p. 256 (2015). http://www.cyclingcities.info/
  30. 30.
    Opromolla, A., Ingrosso, A., Volpi, V., Medaglia, C.M., Palatucci, M., Pazzola, M.: Gamification in a smart city context. An analysis and a proposal for its application in co-design processes. In: De Gloria, A. (ed.) GALA 2014. LNCS, vol. 9221, pp. 73–82. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22960-7_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pajarito, D., Gould, M.: Paper Survey Table - Smart Mobility - role of mobile games, November 2017. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.840352. https://zenodo.org/record/840352%7B%5C#%7D.WYrJB62B0UE
  32. 32.
    ProtoGeo Inc.: Moves (2017). https://www.moves-app.com/
  33. 33.
    Roche, S.: Geographic information science I: why does a smart city need to be spatially enabled. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 38(5), 703–711 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513517365. http://phg.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/02/06/0309132513517365.abstract. ISSN 0309-1325
  34. 34.
    Schrammel, J., Prost, S., Mattheiss, E., Bothos, E., Tscheligi, M.: Using individual and collaborative challenges in behavior change support systems: findings from a two-month field trial of a trip planner application. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 160–171. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sileryte, R., Nourian, P., van der Spek, S.: Modelling spatial patterns of outdoor physical activities using mobile sports tracking application data. In: Sarjakoski, T., Santos, M.Y., Sarjakoski, L.T. (eds.) Geospatial Data in a Changing World. LNGC, pp. 179–197. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33783-8_11 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith, M.E.: Moving towards a greener future: an investigation of how transit-oriented development has the potential to redefine cities around sustainability. Scripps Senior theses. Claremont Graduate University, p. 81 (2015). http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps%7B%5C_%7Dtheses/534/
  37. 37.
    Social Bicycles. Social Cyclist (2017). http://socialcyclist.com/
  38. 38.
    Stieglitz, S., Hassannia, S.: Idea generation by employees and external participants in innovation competitions. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4272–4281, March 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.530. ISSN 15301605
  39. 39.
    Stragier, J., et al.: Understanding persistence in the use of online fitness communities: comparing novice and experienced users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 34–42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.013. ISSN 07475632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Suh, A., Wagner, C., Liu, L.: The effects of game dynamics on user engagement in gamified systems. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 672–681, March 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.87. ISSN 15301605
  41. 41.
    Tuveri, E., et al.: Fitmersive games: fitness gamification through immersive VR. In: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2016, pp. 212–215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2909132.2909287
  42. 42.
    Wunsch, M., Stibe, A., Millonig, A., Seer, S., Chin, R.C.C., Schechtner, K.: Gamification and social dynamics: insights from a corporate cycling campaign. In: Streitz, N., Markopoulos, P. (eds.) DAPI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9749, pp. 494–503. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39862-4_45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zeile, P., et al.: Urban emotions and cycling experience - enriching traffic planning for cyclists with human sensor data. In: GI_Forum, vol. 1, pp. 204–216 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2016_01_ s204. http://hw.oeaw.ac.at/?arp=0x0033ffa1. ISSN 2308-1708
  44. 44.
    Zhao, Z., Ali Etemad, S., Arya, A., Whitehead, A.: Usability and motivational effects of a gamified exercise and fitness system based on wearable devices. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2016. LNCS, vol. 9747, pp. 333–344. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40355-7_32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat Jaume ICastellonSpain

Personalised recommendations