Brain Effective Connectivity Analysis from EEG for Positive and Negative Emotion
Recently, there have been increasing evidence which supports that multiple brain regions are involved in emotion processing. Therefore, research on emotion from the perspective of brain network is becoming popular. In this study, based on the Granger causal analysis method, we constructed brain effective connectivity network from DEAP emotional EEG data to investigate how emotion affects the patterns of effective connectivity. According to our results, prefrontal region plays the most important role in emotion processing with interactions to almost all other regions. More interactions are found under negative emotion than positive one. Parietal region in charge of human’s alert mechanism is more active under negative emotions. These results are consistent with the previous findings obtained in neuroscience, which illustrate the effectiveness of our methods. Furthermore, the brain effective connectivity network shows significant differences to different emotional states, so it can be used to recognize different emotional states with EEG.
KeywordsEmotion processing Granger causality Brain effective network EEG
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61100102 and Grant 61473110 and Grant 61633010, in part by the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China under Grant 2014DFG12570.
- 1.Bono, V., Biswas, D., Das, S., et al.: Classifying human emotional states using wireless EEG based ERP and functional connectivity measures. In: IEEE International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
- 6.Koelstra, S., Muhl, C., Soleymani, M., et al.: DEAP: a database for emotion analysis. Using Physiol. Signals 3, 18–31 (2016). IEEEGoogle Scholar
- 8.James, D.H.: Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press (2007)Google Scholar
- 11.Durbin, J., Watson, G.S.: Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. I. In: Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (eds.) Breakthroughs in Statistics. Springer Series in Statistics (Perspectives in Statistics), pp. 237–259. Springer, New York (1992). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Wang, N., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Tang, Y., Wang, J.: Gamma oscillation in brain connectivity in emotion recognition by Granger causality. In.: International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 2, pp. 762–766. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Friedman, D., Shapira, S., Jacobson, L., Gruberger, M.: A data-driven validation of frontal EEG asymmetry using a consumer device. In: International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pp. 930–937. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
- 15.Kim, M.K., Kim, M., Oh, E., Kim, S.P.: A review on the computational methods for emotional state estimation from the human EEG. J. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2013, 13 p. (2013). Article ID 573734. doi: 10.1155/2013/573734