Advertisement

Factors influencing on mechanical properties of porcine skin obtained in tensile test-preliminary studies

  • Aneta Liber-KnećEmail author
  • Sylwia Łagan
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 623)

Abstract

Skin tissue shows sensitivity to many factors resulting from its biological nature and also connected with mechanical tests conditions. The aim of the study was to analyze the influence of sex and age of the animal and conditions of samples storage on mechanical properties of porcine skin. The uniaxial tensile tests were carried out for samples taken from two different pigs and stored before the test. The basic mechanical parameters were compared. The study revealed sensitivity of the skin samples to different factors. Comparison of skin samples taken from the porker the and sow differing in age and weight showed that better substitute for the human skin for mechanical properties tested in vitro is the porker skin. The use of different storage variants exhibited similar influence of freezing and incubating in saline solution for 2 days for porker samples, and significant influence of freezing for 5 days.

Keywords

porcine skin tensile test storing conditions tensile strength 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adull Manan, N.F., Muhammad, J., Ismail, M.H.: Quantifying the biomechanical properties of bovine skin under uniaxial tension. Journal of Medical and Bioengineering. 2(1), 45–48 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ben Bassat, H.: Performance and safety of skin allografts. Clinical Dermatology. 23(4), 365– 375 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corr, D.T., Hart, D.A.: Biomechanics of scar tissue and uninjured skin. Advances in Wound Care. 2(2), 37–43 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corr, D.T., Gallant-Behm, C.L., Shrive, N.G., Hart, D.A.: Biomechanical behavior of scar tissue and uninjured skin in a porcine model. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 17, 250–259 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De, A., Mathur, M., Gore, M.A.: Viability of cadaver skin grafts stored in skin bank at two different temperatures. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 128(6), 769–771 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geerligs, M.: Skin layer mechanics. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eidhoven., 27–30 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Groves, R.B., Coulman, S.A., Birchall, J.C., Evans, S.L.: An anisotropic, hyperelastic model for skin: Experimental measurements, finite element modeling and identification of parameters for human and murine skin. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 18, 167–180 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han, B., Bischof, J.C.: Engineering Challenges in Tissue Preservation. Cell Preservation Technology. 2(2), 91–112 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karimi, A., Rahmatic, S.M., Navidbakhsh, M.: Mechanical characterization of the rat and mice skin tissues using histostructural and uniaxial data. Bioengineered. 6(3), 153–160 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ni Annaidh, A.N., Bruyere, K., Destrade, M., Gilchrist, M.D., Maurini, C., Ottenio, M., Saccomandi, G.: Automated estimation of collagen fiber dispersion in the dermis and its contribution to the anisotropic behavior of skin. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 40(8), 1666–1678 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ogawa, R., Kazuhisa, O., Tokumura, F., Mori, K., Ohmori, Y., Huang, C., Hyakusoku, H., Akaishi, S.: The relationship between stretching/contraction and pathologic scarring: The role of mechanical forces in keliod generation.Wound Repair and Regeneration. 20, 149–157 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pailler-Mattei, C., Beca, S., Zahouani, H.: In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests. Medical Engineering and Physics. 30, 599–606 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silver, F.H., Freeman, J.W., DeVore, D.: Viscoelastic properties of human skin and processed dermis. Skin Research and Technology. 7(1), 18–23 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swindle, M.M., Makin, A., Herron, A.J., Clubb Jr., F.J., Frazier, K.S.: Swine as models in biomedical research and toxicology testing.Veterinary Pathology. 49(2), 344–356 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zieger, M.A. J., Tredget, E.E., McGann, L.E.: Mechanisms of cryoinjury and cryoprotection in split-thickness skin. Cryobiology. 33(3), 376–389 (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Źak, M., Kuropka, P., Kobielarz, M., Dudek, A., Kaleta-Kuratewicz, K., Szotek, S.: Determination of the mechanical properties of the skin of pig fetuses with respect to its structure. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 13 (2), 37–43 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cracow University of TechnologyCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations