Advertisement

Assessment of locomotor functions of patients suffering from cerebral palsy qualified to treat by different methods

  • Katarzyna Jochymczyk-Woźniak
  • Katarzyna Nowakowska
  • Robert Michnik
  • Agnieszka Konopelska
  • Jerzy Luszawski
  • Marek Mandera
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 623)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess locomotor functions of patients with cerebral palsy and qualified for various treatment procedures on the basis of indicative methods and parameters constituting the Gillette Gait Index. The studied group consisted of 57 healthy children and 60 children with different types CP and different degrees of disability: REH - patients subjected to physiotherapy only, BOT - patients subjected to the injection of botulinum toxin and intensive rehabilitation and RIZ - patients qualified for the surgical procedure of the selective dorsal rhizotomy. Gait investigations were carried out using BTS Smart system and the gait assessment was made on the basis of gait indices methods (GGI, GDI). The statistical analysis demonstrated that the most diversified parameters characterising patients with CP qualified for various treatments are: knee flexion at initial contact, time of peak knee flexion, range of knee flexion, range of pelvic tilt.

Keywords

botulinum toxin (BOT) gait analysis gait indicase methods GGI GDI physiotherapy (REH) the selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brochard S., Remy-Neris O., Filipetti P., Bussel B.: Intrathecal baclofen infusion for ambulant children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurol, 40(4), 265–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Desloovere K., De Cat J., Molenaers G., Franki I., Himpens E., Van Waelvelde H., Fagard K., Van den Broeck C.: The effect of different physiotherapy interventions in post-BTX-A treatment of children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 16(1), 20–28 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jochymczyk-Woźniak K., Janoska P., Michnik R.: Evaluation of selected parameters in the gait of children after removing the posterior cranial tumor (Ocena wybranych parametrów chodu dzieci po usuni˛eciu guza tylnej jamy czaszki), in: Selected issues of sport biomechanics and rehabilitation (Wybrane zagadnienia biomechaniki sportu i rehabilitacji), T. 1. Red. Czesław Urbanik, Andrzej Mastalerz. Warszawa : Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego Józefa Piłsudskiego, 57–68 (2012) (in Polish)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michnik R., Jurkojć J., Pauk J.: Identification of muscles forces during gait of children with foot disabilities. MECHANIKA, 6(80), 48–51 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molloy A., McDowell B.C., Kerr C., Cosgrove A.P.: Further evidence of validity of the Gait Deviation Index. Gait & Posture, 31, 479–482 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nowakowska K., Michnik R., Jochymczyk-Woźniak K., Jurkojć J., Mandera M., Kopyta I.: Application of gait index assessment to monitor the treatment progress in patients with cerebral palsy (in:) Information Technologies in Medicine 5th International Conference, ITIB, Kamień Sĺąski, Poland, June 20-22, 2016 Proceedings, Piętka E., Badura P., Kawa J., Wieclawek W. (eds.), Advances in Intelligent System and Computing 472, vol. 2, 75–85 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts A., Stewart C., Freeman R.: Gait analysis to guide a selective dorsal rhizotomy program. Gait & Posture, 42, 16–22 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romei R., Galli M., Motta F., Schwartz M., Crivellini M.: Use of the normalcy index for the evaluation of gait pathology. Gait & Posture, 19(1), 85–90 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schutte L.M., Narayanan U., Stout J.L., Selber P., Gage J.R., Schwartz M.H.: An index for quantifying deviations from normal gait. Gait & Posture, 11, 25–31 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwartz M., Rozumalski A.: The gait deviation index: A new comprehensive index of gait pathology. Gait & Posture, 28, 51–357 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Syczewska M, Dembowska-Bagińska B, Perek-Polnik M, Kalinowska M, Perek D.: Gait pathology assessed with Gillette Gait Index in patients after CNS tumour treatment. Gait & Posture, 32, 358–362 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katarzyna Jochymczyk-Woźniak
    • 1
  • Katarzyna Nowakowska
    • 1
  • Robert Michnik
    • 1
  • Agnieszka Konopelska
    • 2
  • Jerzy Luszawski
    • 3
  • Marek Mandera
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiomechatronicsSilesian University of TechnologyZabrzePoland
  2. 2.Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanicsthe Silesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland
  3. 3.Upper Silesian Children’s Health Centre in KatowiceKatowicePoland

Personalised recommendations