Advertisement

Liquidity Proxies Based on Intraday Data: The Case of the Polish Order-Driven Stock Market

  • Joanna Olbrys
  • Michal Mursztyn
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to estimate selected liquidity measures based on high-frequency intraday data and to examine their magnitude on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE). We construct and analyze a panel of data which consists of daily proxies of five liquidity estimates for 53 WSE-traded companies divided into three size groups. Although the WSE is classified as an order-driven market with an electronic order book, the raw data set does not identify trade direction. Therefore, the trade classification Lee and Ready (J Finance 46(2):733–746, 1991) algorithm is employed to infer trade sides and to distinguish between so-called buyer- and seller-initiated trades. Moreover, the paper provides a robustness analysis of the obtained results with respect to the whole sample and three adjacent subsamples each of equal size: the precrisis, global financial crisis (GFC), and postcrisis periods. The constructed panel of data would be utilized in further investigation concerning commonality in liquidity on the Polish stock market.

Keywords

Intraday data Liquidity Trade classification algorithm Order-driven market Global financial crisis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the grant “Comparative research on commonality in liquidity on the Central and Eastern European stock markets” from the National Science Center, Poland, No. 2016/21/B/HS4/02004.

References

  1. Acker, D., Stalker, M., & Tonks, I. (2002). Daily closing inside spreads and trading volumes around earnings announcements. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(9/10), 1149–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., & Lundblad, C. (2007). Liquidity and expected returns: Lessons from emerging markets. Review of Financial Studies, 20(6), 1783–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brockman, P., & Chung, D. Y. (2000). An empirical investigation of trading on asymmetric information and heterogeneous prior beliefs. Journal of Emp Finance, 7, 417–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chakrabarty, B., Li, B., Nguyen, V., & Van Ness, R. A. (2007). Trade classification algorithms for electronic communications network trades. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 3806–3821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chakrabarty, B., Moulton, P. C., & Shkilko, A. (2012). Short sale, long sale, and the Lee-Ready trade classification algorithm revisited. Journal of Financial Markets, 15(4), 467–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan, K., & Fong, W.-M. (2000). Trade size, order imbalance, and the volatility-volume relation. Journal of Financial Economics, 57, 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2000). Commonality in liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 56, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2001). Market liquidity and trading activity. The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 501–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2002). Order imbalance, liquidity, and market returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chordia, T., Sarkar, A., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2005). An empirical analysis of stock and bond market liquidity. Review of Financial Studies, 18(1), 85–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung, K. H., & Van Ness, R. A. (2001). Order handling rules, tick size, and the intraday pattern of bid-ask spreads for Nasdaq stocks. Journal of Financial Markets, 4, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coppejans, M., Domowitz, I., & Madhavan A. (2004). Resiliency in an automated auction. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  13. Corwin, S. A. (1999). Differences in trading behavior cross NYSE specialist firms. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 721–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elyasiani, E., Hauser, S., & Lauterbach, B. (2000). Market response to liquidity improvements: Evidence from exchange listings. Financial Review, 41, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finucane, T. J. (2000). A direct test of methods for inferring trade direction from intra-day data. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(4), 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glosten, L. R. (1987). Components of the bid-ask spread and the statistical properties of transaction prices. The Journal of Finance, 42(4), 1293–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goyenko, R. Y., Holden, C. W., & Trzcinka, C. A. (2009). Do liquidity measures measure liquidity? Journal of Financial Economics, 92, 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hameed, A., Kang, W., & Viswanathan, S. (2010). Stock market decline and liquidity. The Journal of Finance, 65(1), 257–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, L. (2003). Trading and exchanges: Market microstructure for practitioners. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Huang, R. D., & Stoll, H. R. (1996). Dealer versus auction markets: A paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE. Journal of Financial Economics, 41, 313–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang, R. D., & Stoll, H. R. (1997). The components of the bid-ask spread: A general approach. Review of Financial Studies, 10(4), 995–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kluger, B. D., & Stephan, J. (1997). Alternative liquidity measures and stock returns. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 8, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korajczyk, R., & Sadka, R. (2008). Pricing the commonality across alternative measures of liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica, 53(6), 1315–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, C. M. C., & Ready, M. J. (1991). Inferring trade direction from intraday data. The Journal of Finance, 46(2), 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, C. M. C., Mucklow, B., & Ready, M. J. (1993). Spreads, depths, and the impact of earnings information: An intraday analysis. Review of Financial Studies, 6(2), 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lesmond, D. A. (2005). Liquidity of emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 411–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levin, E. J., & Wright, R. E. (1999). Explaining the intra-day variation in the bid-ask spread in competitive dealership markets – A research note. Journal of Financial Markets, 2(2), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin, J.-C., Sanger, G. C., & Booth, G. G. (1995). Trade size and components of the bid-ask spread. Review of Financial Studies, 8(4), 1153–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nowak, S. (2017). Order imbalance indicators in asset pricing: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. In K. Jajuga, L. Orlowski, & K. Staehr (Eds.), Contemporary trends and challenges in finance. Springer proceedings in business and economics (pp. 91–102). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nowak, S., & Olbryś, J. (2016). Direct evidence of non-trading on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics, 428, 184–194.Google Scholar
  33. Olbryś, J. (2014). Is illiquidity risk priced? The case of the Polish medium-size emerging stock market. Bank & Credit, 45(6), 513–536.Google Scholar
  34. Olbryś, J. (2017). Interaction between market depth and market tightness on the Warsaw Stock Exchange: A preliminary study. In K. Jajuga, L. Orlowski, & K. Staehr (Eds.), Contemporary trends and challenges in finance. Springer proceedings in business and economics (pp. 103–111). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olbrys, J., & Majewska, E. (2014). Direct identification of crisis periods on the CEE stock markets: The influence of the 2007 U.S. subprime crisis. Proceedings of the Economics & Finance, 14, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olbryś, J., & Majewska, E. (2015). Bear market periods during the 2007-2009 financial crisis: Direct evidence from the Visegrad countries. Acta Oecon, 65(4), 547–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olbryś, J., & Mursztyn, M. (2015). Comparison of selected trade classification algorithms on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Advanced Computer Science Research, 12, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olbrys, J., & Mursztyn, M. (2017). Dimensions of market liquidity: The case of the Polish stock market. In N. Tsounis & A. Vlachvei (Eds.), Advances in applied economic research. Springer proceedings in business and economics (pp. 151–166). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pagan, A. R., & Sossounov, K. A. (2003). A simple framework for analysing bull and bear markets. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peterson, M., & Sirri, E. (2003). Evaluation of the biases in execution costs estimation using trades and quotes data. Journal of Financial Markets, 6(3), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piwowar, M. S., & Wei, L. (2003). The sensitivity of effective spread estimates to trade-quote matching algorithms. Electronic Markets, 16(2), 112–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pukthuanthong-Le, K., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2009). Commonality in liquidity: Evidence from the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Pacif-Basin Finance Journal, 17(1), 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ranaldo, A. (2001). Intraday market liquidity on the Swiss Stock Exchange. Swiss Soc Financ Mark Res, 15(3), 309–327.Google Scholar
  44. Roll, R. (1984). A simple implicit measure of the effective bid-ask spread in an efficient market. The Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1127–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stoll, H. S. (2000). Friction. The Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1479–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Theissen, E. (2001). A test of the accuracy of the Lee/Ready trade classification algorithm. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 11, 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of financial time series. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Ness, B. F., Van Ness, R. A., & Pruitt, S. W. (2000). The impact of the reduction in tick increments in major U.S. markets on spreads, depth, and volatility. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 15, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. von Wyss, R. (2004). Measuring and predicting liquidity in the stock market. Dissertation Nr. 2899, University of St. Gallen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bialystok University of TechnologyBialystokPoland

Personalised recommendations