Why It Would Not Be Better Not to Believe in Material Artifacts – Even If One Could Get Away With It

  • Amrei Bahr
  • Christoph Fischer
  • Thomas Kater
  • Nicolas Kleinschmidt
Chapter
Part of the Münster Lectures in Philosophy book series (MUELP, volume 4)

Abstract

Peter van Inwagen famously promotes the unusual claim that there are no such things as material artifacts. In order to make his claim plausible, he presents a number of arguments, three of which will be subject to discussion in this paper: We argue that these arguments fail to make a convincing case for the denial of material artifacts. In addition, we reveal the benefits of the belief in the existence of material artifacts. We conclude that, contrary to van Inwagen’s suggestion, it would not be better not to believe in material artifacts, as there are a number of good reasons for holding on to this belief.

Keywords

Artifact Artifact creation Artifact functions Copyright Cultural evolution Persistence Van Inwagen 

References

  1. Bahr, Amrei. 2016. What is an artefact copy? A quadrinomial definition. In The aesthetics and ethics of copying, ed. Darren H. Hick and Reinold Schmücker, 81–98. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, Lynne R. 2002. On making things up. Constitution and its critics. Philosophical Topics 30: 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2007. The metaphysics of everyday life. An essay in practical realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrara, Massimiliano, Silvia Gaio, and Marzia Soavi. 2014. Artifact kinds, identity criteria, and logical adequacy. In Artefact kinds: Ontology and the human-made world, ed. Marten Franssen, Peter Kroes, Thomas A.C. Reydon, and Pieter E. Vermaas, 85–105. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Dipert, Randall. 1995. Some issues in the theory of artifacts. Defining “artifact” and related notions. The Monist 78: 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elder, Crawford L. 2014. Artifacts and mind independence. In Franssen et. al., 27–43.Google Scholar
  7. Gill, Mary L. 1989. Aristotle on substance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hilpinen, Risto. 1993. Authors and artifacts. Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society 93: 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hobbes, Thomas. [1655] 1981. Computatio sive logica. Part 1 of De Corpore. Trans. A.P. Martinich. New York: Abaris Books.Google Scholar
  10. Houkes, Wybo, and Pieter E. Vermaas. 2010. Technical functions. On the use and design of artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jansen, Ludger. 2013a. Artefact kinds need not be kinds of artifacts. In Johanssonian investigations. Essays in honour of Ingvar Johansson on his seventienth birthday, ed. C. Svennerlind et al., 317–337. Heusenstamm: Ontos.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2013b. Warum sich Artefakte ihrer Marginalisierung widersetzen. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61: 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Millikan, Ruth G. 1984. Language, thought and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Preston, Beth. 2014. Ethnotechnology. A manifesto. In Artefact kinds: Ontology and the human-made world, ed. Marten Franssen, Peter Kroes, Thomas A.C. Reydon, and Pieter E. Vermaas, 145–167. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Rehbinder, Manfred, and Alexander Peukert. 2015. Urheberrecht. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  16. Reicher, Maria E. 2013. Wie aus Gedanken Dinge werden. Eine Philosophie der Artefakte. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61: 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomasson, Amie L. 2014. Public artifacts, intentions and norms. In Artefact kinds: Ontology and the human-made world, ed. Marten Franssen, Peter Kroes, Thomas A.C. Reydon, and Pieter E. Vermaas, 45–63. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Van Inwagen, Peter. 1990. Material beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2004. A theory of properties. In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 1, ed. Dean Zimmerman, 107–138. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amrei Bahr
    • 1
  • Christoph Fischer
    • 1
  • Thomas Kater
    • 1
  • Nicolas Kleinschmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyWWU MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations