Van Inwagen on the Problem of Evil: Is His Defense Story Reasonable?

  • Benedikt Paul Göcke
  • Cristina Schneider
  • Anna Sindermann
Chapter
Part of the Münster Lectures in Philosophy book series (MUELP, volume 4)

Abstract

It is often argued that the existence of an omniscient, omnipotent and morally perfect God is inconsistent with, or at least highly improbable in light of the undeniable fact that there is evil in the world. According to van Inwagen’s defense story, however, the existence of evil in fact is to be expected on the assumption that our ancestors freely turned away from God. The age of evil, according to van Inwagen’s defense, will end only if we freely return to living in loving union with Him. We are going to show that any defense story that is based on van Inwagen’s understanding of “God”, “love” and “freedom” is unreasonable.

Keywords

Problem of evil Theodicy Omniscience Moral perfection Rational belief 

References

  1. Mackie, J.L. 1955. Evil and omnipotence. Mind 64: 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. van Inwagen, Peter. 1988. The magnitude, duration, and distribution of evil: A theodicy. Philosophical Topics 16: 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 1998. Probability and evil. In The possibility of resurrection and other essays in Christian apologetics, 69–87. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2001. The argument from particular horrendous evils. In Proceedings of the American catholic philosophical association, vol. 74, 65–80.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2002. What is the problem of the hiddenness of God? In Divine hiddenness. New essays, ed. Daniel Howard-Snyder and Paul K. Moser, 24–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2005. Is God an unnecessary hypothesis? In God and the ethics of belief, ed. Andrew Dole and Andrew Chignell, 131–149. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2006. The problem of evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2008. What does an omniscient being know about the future? In Oxford studies for the philosophy of religion: Volume 1, ed. Jonathan Kvanvig, 216–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2014. Metaphysics. 4th ed. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedikt Paul Göcke
    • 1
  • Cristina Schneider
    • 2
  • Anna Sindermann
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty for Catholic TheologyRuhr UniversityBochumGermany
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyWWU MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations