The Strange Cases of Henry T. and Walter B.: Van Inwagen on Personal Identity, Accountability and Mitigating Circumstances

Chapter
Part of the Münster Lectures in Philosophy book series (MUELP, volume 4)

Abstract

This paper deals with two problems that arise in the context of Peter van Inwagen’s treatment of responsibility. First, according to van Inwagen, a human person is identical with a human organism. If so, even drastic events, like an irreversible memory loss accompanied by a severe personality change, would not affect the diachronic identity of persons. It seems at least as plausible, however, to treat the amnesiac like a legal successor who inherits certain obligations without being morally accountable for actions of her predecessor. Second, van Inwagen has argued that neither external (skills, number of opportunities etc.) nor internal (desires, values) factors that have statistical effects on human behavior can provide a moral excuse or mitigating circumstance. We present examples that strongly suggest that van Inwagen’s claim is wrong.

Keywords

Amnesia Klüver-Bucy syndrome Mitigating circumstance Moral responsibility Personality Personal identity 

References

  1. Fujiwara, Esther, et al. 2008. Functional retrograde amnesia: A multiple case study. Cortex 44: 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Locke, John. 1690. In An essay concerning human understanding, ed. Peter Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Sacks, Oliver. 2015. Urge. New York Review of Books 62: 4.Google Scholar
  4. van Inwagen, Peter. 1995. Material beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1997. Materialism and the psychological-continuity account of personal identity. Philosophical Perspectives 11: 305–319.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2001. Genes, statistics, and desert. In Genetics and criminal behavior, ed. David Wasserman and Robert Wachbroit, 225–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2006a. The problem of evil. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2006b. Can mereological sums change their parts? Journal of Philosophy 103: 614–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2007. A materialist ontology of the human person. In Persons. Human and divine, ed. P. van Inwagen and D. Zimmerman, 199–215. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2015. Metaphysics. 4th ed. Boulder: Westview Press Inc..Google Scholar
  11. Wikipedia. 2017. Regarding Henry. In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regarding_Henry. Accessed 26 March 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty for Catholic TheologyRuhr UniversityBochumGermany
  2. 2.Department of Christian PhilosophyUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations