Abstract
This paper proposes an alternative approach to evaluating Human- Robot Interaction (HRI), drawing on the field of Anthropology. Considering the user in the traditional robot-environment dyad has major practical and philosophical implications. This paper contends that the traditional scientific method, by itself, is not sufficient to account for the complexity and social nature of the interaction. Instead, it should be complemented with exploratory, ethnographic and reflexive research in order to make additional philosophical, practical and ethical contributions. The HRI evaluation model proposed in this paper builds on existing HRI models and draws on theories and methodologies from the field of Anthropology. It applies a ‘refunctioned’ approach to ethnography, in which roboticists and anthropologists collaborate to evaluate robot interactions from an ethnographic, experimental and ethical perspective to reconcile three distinct ontological views of the user experience: robot-centric, human-centred, and societal impact. The model represents a formative approach to evaluation, in which early-stage explorative and empirical data is used to capture a holistic view of the interaction. This descriptive data may subsequently be parsed to develop specific and testable hypotheses and design principles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kiesler, S., Hinds, P.: Introduction to this special issue on human–robot interaction. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19, 1–8 (2004)
Dautenhahn, K.: Methodology & themes of human-robot interaction: a growing research field. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 4, 103–108 (2007). doi:10.5772/5702
Richardson, K.: An Anthropology of Robots and AI: Annihilation Anxiety and Machines. Routledge, New York (2015)
Vidal, D.: Anthropomorphism or sub-anthropomorphism? An anthropological approach to gods and robots. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 13, 917–933 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00464.x
Coeckelbergh, M.: Moving Machines: Robots, empathy, and the performance of suffering. In: Embodied Cognition, Acting and Performance, AISB (2015)
Nourbakhsh, I.R.: Robot Futures. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)
Sparrow, R.: The march of the robot dogs. Ethics Inf. Technol. 4, 305–318 (2002). doi:10.1023/A:1021386708994
Turkle, S.: Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books, New York (2011)
Young, J.E., Sung, J., Voida, A., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T., Christensen, H.I., Grinter, R.E.: Evaluating human-robot interaction: Focusing on the holistic interaction experience. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 53–67 (2011). doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0081-8
Dourish, P.: Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. Where action is Found. embodied Interact. 36, 412–413 (2001). doi:10.1162/leon.2003.36.5.412
Forsythe, D.: Studying Those who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto (2001)
Breazeal, C.L.: Designing Sociable Robots. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)
Bartneck, C., Kuli, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 71–81 (2009). doi:10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
Steinfeld, A., Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A., Goodrich, M.: Common metrics for human-robot interaction. In: Proceeding of 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference Human-robot Interaction - HRI 2006, p. 33 (2006). doi:10.1145/1121241.1121249
Dautenhahn, K.: Socially intelligent robots. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 362, 679–704 (2007). doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2004
Weiss, A., Bernhaupt, R., Tscheligi, M.: The USUS evaluation framework for user-centered HRI. New Front. Hum. Robot Interact. 2, 89–110 (2011)
James, P.: Globalism, Nationalism, Tribalism: Bringing Theory Back. SAGE Publications, London (2006). Academia.edu
Holmes, D.R., Marcus, G.E.: Collaboration Today and the Re-Imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter. Collab. Anthropol. 1, 81–101 (2008). doi:10.1353/cla.0.0003
Dourish, P.: Where the Action is: the Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Suchman, L.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Orlikowski, W.J.: The duality of technology : rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3, 398–427 (1991). doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf. Syst. Res. 7, 111–134 (1996). doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111
Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence Without Reason. Comput. Thought, IJCAI-91. AI Memo No (1991). doi:10.1109/AOE.2006.307325
Dreyfus, H.L.: What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Heidegger, M.: The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Garland Pub., New York (1977)
Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge, Oxon (2002)
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The embodied Mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books, New York (1999)
Forlizzi, J.: How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of robotic products in the home. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction, pp. 129–136 (2007)
Fisher, R.: Anthropologists and social impact assessment: negotiating the ethical minefield. Asia Pacific J. Anthropol. 9, 231–242 (2008). doi:10.1080/14442210802251670
Westman, C.: Social Impact Assessment and the Anthropology of the Future in Canada’s Tar Sands. Hum. Organ. 72, 111–120 (2013). doi:10.17730/humo.72.2.e0m6426502384675
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Veling, L. (2017). Becoming Real: An Anthropological Approach to Evaluating Robots in the Real World. In: Kheddar, A., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10652. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_63
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_63
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70021-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70022-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)