Skip to main content

Revenue Improvement Mechanisms Based on Advertisement’s Values and Layouts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances and Future Prospects in Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems (KICSS 2015)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 685))

  • 465 Accesses

Abstract

We study an advertisement transaction market which is considering a value of advertisement in addition to monetary value. This paper proposes a novel model for advertisement transactions which employs two stages auctions. To improve an advertisement value for advertisers, it is important to consider not only advertisement sizes and its allocations but also its combinations for the advertisers’ marketing strategies. The two stages auction aims to improve the advertisement value and seller’s revenue. The concept of our model is that the advertisers can consider own marketing strategies for the auction. The first auction winner can choose some preferred other advertisers to make a second auction, and also he/she can reject inconvenient advertisers. The first auction winner can consider the marketing strategy by making a convenient bidders set in the second auction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., Schwarz, M.: Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Am. Econ. Rev. 9(1), 242–259 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. http://google.com

  3. Arshad, A.M., Su, Q.: Interlinking service delivery innovation and service quality: a conceptual framework. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 31(5), 1807–1822 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gan, C., Cohen, D., Clemes, M.: A Survey of Customer Retention in the New Zealand Banking Industry. Banks and Banks Syst. 1(4), 83–99 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sridhar, M.S.: Customer participation in service production and delivery system. Libr. Sci. Slant Doc. Inf. Stud. 35(3), 157–163 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi, S., Matsuo, T., LEE, R.Y.: Advertisement pricing and layout mechanism in GlobalAd. J. Inf. 16(2B), 1546–1554 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi, S., Matsuo, T., Lee, R.Y., Ito, T.: A co-dependent value-based mechanism for the internet advertisement auction. In: Cranefield, S., Song, I., (eds.) Agent Based Simulation for a Sustainable Society and Multi-agent Smart Computing LNAI 7580, pp. 64–77. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schrijver, A.: Combinatorial Optimization: polyhedra and efficiency. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Takahashi, S., Shigeno, M.: Approximation algorithms for a winner determination problem of single-item multi-unit auctions. JSIAM lett. 3, 29–32 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conitzer, V., Sandholm, T.: Failures of the VCG mechanism in combinatorial auctions and exchanges. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 521–528 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sher, I.: Optimal shill bidding in the VCG mechanism. Econ.Theor. 50(2), 341–387 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuo, T., Ito, T., Shintani, T.: A new approach to detecting shill bids in e-auctions. Int. J. Intell. Inf. Database Syst. 1, 3–17 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yokoo, M., Sakurai, Y., Matsubara, S.: The effect of false-name bids in combinatorial auctions: new fraud in internet auctions. Game Econ. Behav. 46(1), 174–188 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Milgrom, P.: Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge University Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Todo, T., Iwasaki, A., Yokoo, M., Sakurai, Y.: Characterizing false-name-proof allocation rules in combinatorial auctions. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 265–272 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI 26870200, 15H02972).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Takahashi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Takahashi, S., Matsuo, T. (2018). Revenue Improvement Mechanisms Based on Advertisement’s Values and Layouts. In: Theeramunkong, T., Skulimowski, A., Yuizono, T., Kunifuji, S. (eds) Recent Advances and Future Prospects in Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems. KICSS 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 685. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70019-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70019-9_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70018-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70019-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics