Advertisement

Agile Software Engineering Methodology for Information Systems’ Integration Projects

  • Kuldar TaveterEmail author
  • Alex Norta
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10646)

Abstract

In this paper, first the notions are defined that are important for running integration projects – system of systems and sociotechnical system – and it is then argued that integrated systems should be treated as sociotechnical systems of systems. This is followed by defining the conceptual framework – viewpoint framework – required for agile engineering of such systems. Based on the viewpoint framework, the agile software engineering methodology for engineering sociotechnical systems of systems is then defined, proceeding by different viewpoint aspects. Presenting the methodology is illustrated by examples from the ongoing large-scale integration project by the European Union.

Keywords

System of systems Sociotechnical system Agile software engineering Integration project 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research work reported in this article has been supported by the TOOP project of the Horizon 2020 program for research and innovation by the European Commission.

References

  1. 1.
    Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. Pearson Education, London (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Popper, S., Bankes, S., Callaway, R., DeLaurentis, D.: System-of-Systems Symposium: Report on a Summer Conversation, 21–22 July. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, Arlington (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kotov, V.: Systems-of-Systems as Communicating Structures. Hewlett Packard Computer Systems Laboratory Paper HPL-97-124, pp. 1–15 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sowa, J.F., Zachman, J.A.: Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 31(3), 590–616 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rajlich, V.: Changing the paradigm of software engineering. Commun. ACM 49(8), 67–70 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sterling, L., Taveter, K.: The Art of Agent-Oriented Modelling. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sommerville, I., Lock, R., Storer, T., Dobson, J.: Deriving information requirements from responsibility models. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 515–529. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tenso, T., Norta, A., Vorontsova, I.: Evaluating a novel agile requirements engineering method: a case study. In: ENASE 2016 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, Rome, 27–28 April, pp. 156−163. SciTePress (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A.: BPMN: an introduction to the standard. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 34(1), 124–134 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sommerville, I., Cliff, D., Calinescu, R., Keen, J., Kelly, T., Kwiatkowska, M., Mcdermid, J., Paige, R.: Large-scale complex IT systems. Commun. ACM 55(7), 71–77 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taveter, K., Wagner, G.: A multi-perspective methodology for modelling inter-enterprise business processes. In: Arisawa, H., Kambayashi, Y., Kumar, V., Mayr, H.C., Hunt, I. (eds.) ER 2001. LNCS, vol. 2465, pp. 403–416. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi: 10.1007/3-540-46140-X_31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taveter, K.: A multi-perspective methodology for agent-oriented business modelling and simulation. Ph.D. thesis, Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia. Tallinn University of Technology Press (2004). ISBN 9985-59-439-8Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Norta, A., Dua, Y., Ma, L., Rull, A., Kolvart, M., Taveter, K.: eContractual choreography-language properties towards cross-organizational business collaboration. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 6(8), 1–23 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    TOGAF. Open Group Standard, TOGAF Version 9, Part II. Document Number: G116 (2011). ISBN: 9789087536794. The Open Group. http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/index.html. Accessed 11 Sep 2017
  16. 16.
    ArchiMate. ArchiMate® 2.1 Specification, Part 8. Document Number: C13 (2013). ISBN: 1-937218-43-L. The Open Group. http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate2-doc/toc.html. Accessed 11 Sep 2017
  17. 17.
    Bubenko, J.A.: Extending the scope of information modelling. In: Olivé, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Deductive Approach to Information Systems and Databases, 20–22 September, Lloret de Mar, Catalonia, (DAISD 1993). Report de recerca, LSI/93-25-R, Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informatics, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 73–97. Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (UPC) (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Putnam, J.R.: Architecting with RM-ODP. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Atkinson, C., Draheim, D.: Cloud-aided software engineering: evolving viable software systems through a web of views. In: Mahmood, Z., Saeed, S. (eds.) Software Engineering Frameworks for the Cloud Computing Paradigm, pp. 255–281. Springer, London (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5031-2_12
  20. 20.
    Tenso, T., Norta, A.H., Rootsi, H., Taveter, K., Vorontsova, I.: Enhancing requirements engineering in agile methodologies by agent-oriented goal models: Two empirical case studies. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 5 September. IEEE Digital Library (2017). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8054864/. doi: 10.1109/REW.2017.24

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Software ScienceTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations