Fuzzy Measure of National Sustainable Development Aggregate Index

  • Gorkhmaz Imanov
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 125)


In this paper is proposed fuzzy measure of national sustainable development aggregate index (NSDAI) taking into account the sub-indices of economic, social and environmental sustainability at the example of Azerbaijan Republic. In order to measure sub-indices we use instruments of intuitionistic fuzzy set, generalized entropy measure of intuitionistic fuzzy set, L. Zadeh’s composite rules of inferences, algorithm of the weighted rules. Next, using the fuzzy method of forgotten effects proposed by A. Kaufman and J. Gil-Aluja, relations between socioeconomic indicators have been analyzed.


Economical sustainable index Diversification level index Financial stability index Social sustainability index Social quality index Human capital index Ecological quality index Green economy index National sustainable development aggregate index 


  1. 1.
    Mitlin, D.: Sustainable development: a guide to the literature. Environ. Urbanization 4(1), 111–124 (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ICSU, ISSC: Review of the Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective, 88 pp. International Council for Science (ICSU), Paris (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Good Practices in the National Sustainable Development Strategies of OECD Countries: OECD 2006, 35 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azerbaijan 2020: Look into the Future Concept of Development, 41 pp. (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumgrtner, S., Quaas, M.: What is sustainability economics? Ecol. Econ. 69, 445–450 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tress, R.C.: Unemployment and the diversification of industry. Manchester Sch. 9, 140–152 (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacquemin, A., Berry, C.: Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. J. Ind. Econ. 27, 359–369 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirschman, A.O.: The Paternity of an index. Am. Econ. Rev. 761–762 (1964)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kosko, B.: Fuzziness vs probability. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 17(2–3), 211–240 (1990). United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borio, C., Drehmann, M.: Towards an operational framework for financial stability: fuzzy measurement and its consequences, BIS Working Papers No 284, 50 pp., June 2009Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87–96 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 118, 467–477 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beck, W., van der Maesen, L., Walker, A.: Social quality: from issue to concept. In: Beck, W., van der Maesen, L., Walker, A. (eds.) The Social Quality of Europe. Kluwar Law International, The Hague, Netherlands, pp. 263–296 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beck, W., van der Maesen, L., Thomese, F., Walker, A. (eds.): Social Quality: A Vision for Europe. Kluwer Law, The Hague, Netherlands, pp. 307–360 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van der Maeson, I., Walker, A., Keizer, M.: European Network Indicators of Social Quality ENIQ, Social Quality the final report. European Foundation on Social Quality, 105 pp., April 2005Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC 3, 28–44 (1973)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poulsen, J.R.: Fuzzy time series Forecasting, AAUE, 67 pp., Nov 2009Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schults, T.W.: Investment in human capital. Am. Econ. Rev. LI(1), 1–17 (1961)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Becker, G.: Investments in human capital: a theoretical analysis. J. Polit. Econ. 70, 9–44 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Well-being of Nations: The role of human and social capital, OECD, Paris, 118 pp. (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kwon, D.-B.: Human capital and its measurement. In: The 3rd OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy Charting Progress, Building Visions, Improving Life, Busan, Korea, 15 pp., 27–30 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    World development indicators: World Bank, 430 pp. (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knowledge for development: World Bank. (2012)
  24. 24.
    The Conference board Total Economy Database TM:, Jan 2013
  25. 25.
    Morelli, J.: Environmental sustainability: a definition for environmental professionals. J. Environ. Sustain. 1(1), (Article 2), 9 (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ross, T.: Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Application, 2nd edn. Wiley, England (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Towards a green economy. In: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA): A guidebook to the green economy, Issue 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Transparency International the global coalition against corruption: Annual Report (2009), 68 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaufmann, A., Gil-Aluja, J.: Modelospara la investigacion de effectosplvidados Ed. Milladoiro, Espana (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Fuzzy ModellingInstitute of Control Systems, Azerbaijan National Academy of ScienceBaku CityAzerbaijan

Personalised recommendations