Does Policy Consistency Affect Economic Growth?

  • Finn E. Kydland
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 125)


In the long run, nations prosper, in the sense of higher per-capita incomes, lower unemployment, lower poverty levels, and so on, the fewer the impediments are to steadily higher productivity, along with growing productive capacity to take advantage of the productivity growth. In large parts of the world today, however, the business environment is characterized by an extent of uncertainty that is unprecedented over the past several decades. The main reason is lack of clarity in economic policy making. In order to be properly informed and well founded, growth-promoting decisions, such as innovative activity, investment in new productive capacity, choice of new markets, and so on, require an assessment—an expectation—of the policy environment years into the future. Important policy dimensions are tax policy, spending and debt policy, extent of trade restrictions, and the regulatory environment in general.


  1. 1.
    Kydland, F.E.: Implications of dynamic optimal taxation for the evolution of tax structures. Public Choice 41, 229–235 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kydland, F.E., Prescott, E.C.: Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans. J. Polit. Econ. 85, 473–491 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kydland, F.E., Zarazaga, C.E.J.M.: Argentina’s lost decade and the subsequent recovery puzzle. In: Kehoe, T.J., Prescott, E.C. (eds.) Great Depressions of the Twentieth Century, pp. 191–216. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kydland, F.E., Zarazaga, C.E.J.M.: Fiscal sentiment and the weak recovery from the great recession: a quantitative exploration. J. Monet. Econ. 79, 109–125 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parente, S.L., Prescott, E.C.: Barriers to Riches. The MIT Press (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng, S., Storesletten, K., Zilibotti, F.: Growing like China. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 196–233 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations