Abstract
In this study, we investigated the integration of force and position information in a task in which participants were asked to estimate the center of a weak force field. Two hypotheses, describing how participants solved this task, were tested: (1) by only using the position(s) where the force reaches the detection threshold, and (2) by extrapolating the force field based on perceived stiffness. Both hypotheses were also described formally, assuming a psychophysical function obeying a power law with an exponent smaller than one. The hypotheses were tested in two psychophysical experiments, in which 12 participants took part. In Experiment 1, an asymmetric force field was used and the presence of visual feedback about hand position was varied. In Experiment 2, a uni-lateral force field was used. For both experiments, hypothesis 1 predicts biases between (Experiment 1) or at (Experiment 2) the position(s) of the force detection threshold, while hypothesis 2 predicts smaller biases. The measured data show significant biases in both experiments that coincide with the biases predicted by using force detection thresholds from literature. The average measured responses and their variabilities also fitted very well with the mathematical model of hypothesis 1. These results underline the validity of hypothesis 1. So, participants did not use a percept of the stiffness of the force field, but based their estimation of the center of the force field on the position(s) where the force reached the detection threshold. This shows that force and position information were not integrated in this task.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbink DA, Mulder M, Boer ER (2012) Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? Cogn Tech Work 14(1):19–28
Baud-Bovy G (2014) The perception of the centre of elastic force fields: a model of integration of the force and position signals, chap 7. Springer series on touch and haptic systems. Springer, London, pp 127–146
Baud-Bovy G, Gatti E (2010) Hand-held object force direction identification thresholds at rest and during movement. In: Kappers AML, Van Erp JBF, Bergmann Tiest WM, Van der Helm FCT (eds) Haptics: generating and perceiving tangible sensations. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6192. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 231–236
Bocca F, Baud-Bovy G (2009) A model of perception of the central point of elastic force fields. In: Proceedings of the 3rd joint world haptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems (WHC), Salt Lake City, pp 576–581
Dopjans L, Bülthoff HH, Wallraven C (2012) Serial exploration of faces: comparing vision and touch. J Vis 12(1:6):1–14
Drewing K, Ernst MO (2006) Integration of force and position cues for shape perception through active touch. Brain Res 1078(1):92–100
Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415(6870):429–433
Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8(4):162–169
Gurari N, Baud-Bovy G (2014) Customization, control, and characterization of a commercial haptic device for high-fidelity rendering of weak forces. J Neurosci Methods 235:169–180
Heuer H, Rapp K (2012) Adaptation to novel visuo-motor transformations: further evidence of functional haptic neglect. Exp Brain Res 218(1):129–140
Heuer H, Rapp K (2014) Haptic guidance interferes with learning to make movements at an angle to stimulus direction. Exp Brain Res 232(2):675–684
Jacobs RA (1999) Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vis Res 39(21):3621–3629
Jones LA, Hunter IW (1990) A perceptual analysis of stiffness. Exp Brain Res 79(1):150–156
Korman M, Teodorescu K, Cohen A, Reiner M, Gopher D (2012) Effects of order and sensory modality in stiffness perception. Presence Teleop Vir Environ 21(3):295–304
Kuschel M, Di Luca M, Buss M, Klatzky R (2010) Combination and integration in the perception of visual-haptic compliance information. IEEE Trans Haptic 3(4):234–244
Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB, Young M (1995) Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vis Res 35(3):389–412
Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (1991) Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception 20(2):167–177
Robles-De-La-Torre G, Hayward V (2001) Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 412(6845):445–448
Srinivasan MA, LaMotte RH (1995) Tactual discrimination of softness. J Neurophysiol 73(1):88–101
Stevens S (1957) On the psychophysical law. Psychol Rev 64(3):153–181
Stevens JC, Marks LE (1999) Stevens’s power law in vision: exponents, intercepts, and thresholds. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the international society for psychophysics (Fechner Day 1999), pp 87–92
Tan HZ, Durlach NI, Beauregard GL, Srinivasan MA (1995) Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the roles of force and work cues. Percept Psychophys 57(4):495–510
Van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ (1999) Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81(3):1355–1364
Van Beek FE, Bergmann Tiest WM, Mugge W, Kappers AML (2015) Haptic perception of force magnitude and its relation to postural arm dynamics in 3D. Sci Rep 5:18,004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Beek, F.E. (2017). Integrating Force and Position. In: Making Sense of Haptics. Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69920-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69920-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69919-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69920-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)