Skip to main content

Integrating Force and Position

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Making Sense of Haptics

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems ((SSTHS))

  • 689 Accesses

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the integration of force and position information in a task in which participants were asked to estimate the center of a weak force field. Two hypotheses, describing how participants solved this task, were tested: (1) by only using the position(s) where the force reaches the detection threshold, and (2) by extrapolating the force field based on perceived stiffness. Both hypotheses were also described formally, assuming a psychophysical function obeying a power law with an exponent smaller than one. The hypotheses were tested in two psychophysical experiments, in which 12 participants took part. In Experiment 1, an asymmetric force field was used and the presence of visual feedback about hand position was varied. In Experiment 2, a uni-lateral force field was used. For both experiments, hypothesis 1 predicts biases between (Experiment 1) or at (Experiment 2) the position(s) of the force detection threshold, while hypothesis 2 predicts smaller biases. The measured data show significant biases in both experiments that coincide with the biases predicted by using force detection thresholds from literature. The average measured responses and their variabilities also fitted very well with the mathematical model of hypothesis 1. These results underline the validity of hypothesis 1. So, participants did not use a percept of the stiffness of the force field, but based their estimation of the center of the force field on the position(s) where the force reached the detection threshold. This shows that force and position information were not integrated in this task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbink DA, Mulder M, Boer ER (2012) Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? Cogn Tech Work 14(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baud-Bovy G (2014) The perception of the centre of elastic force fields: a model of integration of the force and position signals, chap 7. Springer series on touch and haptic systems. Springer, London, pp 127–146

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baud-Bovy G, Gatti E (2010) Hand-held object force direction identification thresholds at rest and during movement. In: Kappers AML, Van Erp JBF, Bergmann Tiest WM, Van der Helm FCT (eds) Haptics: generating and perceiving tangible sensations. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6192. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 231–236

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bocca F, Baud-Bovy G (2009) A model of perception of the central point of elastic force fields. In: Proceedings of the 3rd joint world haptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems (WHC), Salt Lake City, pp 576–581

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dopjans L, Bülthoff HH, Wallraven C (2012) Serial exploration of faces: comparing vision and touch. J Vis 12(1:6):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drewing K, Ernst MO (2006) Integration of force and position cues for shape perception through active touch. Brain Res 1078(1):92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415(6870):429–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8(4):162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurari N, Baud-Bovy G (2014) Customization, control, and characterization of a commercial haptic device for high-fidelity rendering of weak forces. J Neurosci Methods 235:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heuer H, Rapp K (2012) Adaptation to novel visuo-motor transformations: further evidence of functional haptic neglect. Exp Brain Res 218(1):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heuer H, Rapp K (2014) Haptic guidance interferes with learning to make movements at an angle to stimulus direction. Exp Brain Res 232(2):675–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs RA (1999) Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vis Res 39(21):3621–3629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones LA, Hunter IW (1990) A perceptual analysis of stiffness. Exp Brain Res 79(1):150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Korman M, Teodorescu K, Cohen A, Reiner M, Gopher D (2012) Effects of order and sensory modality in stiffness perception. Presence Teleop Vir Environ 21(3):295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuschel M, Di Luca M, Buss M, Klatzky R (2010) Combination and integration in the perception of visual-haptic compliance information. IEEE Trans Haptic 3(4):234–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB, Young M (1995) Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vis Res 35(3):389–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (1991) Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception 20(2):167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robles-De-La-Torre G, Hayward V (2001) Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 412(6845):445–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Srinivasan MA, LaMotte RH (1995) Tactual discrimination of softness. J Neurophysiol 73(1):88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stevens S (1957) On the psychophysical law. Psychol Rev 64(3):153–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stevens JC, Marks LE (1999) Stevens’s power law in vision: exponents, intercepts, and thresholds. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the international society for psychophysics (Fechner Day 1999), pp 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tan HZ, Durlach NI, Beauregard GL, Srinivasan MA (1995) Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the roles of force and work cues. Percept Psychophys 57(4):495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ (1999) Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81(3):1355–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Beek FE, Bergmann Tiest WM, Mugge W, Kappers AML (2015) Haptic perception of force magnitude and its relation to postural arm dynamics in 3D. Sci Rep 5:18,004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Beek, F.E. (2017). Integrating Force and Position. In: Making Sense of Haptics. Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69920-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69920-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69919-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69920-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics