Abstract
We start from the observation that the notion of concept, as it is used in perception, is distinct and different from the notion of concept, as it is used in knowledge representation. In earlier work we called the first notion, substance concept and the second, classification concept. In this paper we integrate these two notions into a general theory of concepts that organizes them into a hierarchy of increasing abstraction from what is perceived. Thus, at the first level, we have objects (which roughly correspond to substance concepts), which represent what is perceived (e.g., a car); at the second level we have actions, which represent how objects change in time (e.g., move); while, at the third level, we have functions (which roughly correspond to classification concepts), which represent the expected behavior of objects as it is manifested in terms of “an object performing a certain set of actions” (e.g., a vehicle). The main outcome is the notion of Teleology, where teleologies provide the basis for a solution to the problem of the integration of perception and reasoning and, more in general, to the problem of managing the diversity of knowledge.
This work has been supported by QROWD (http://qrowd-project.eu), a Horizon 2020 project, under Grant Agreement No. 732194.
Notes
- 1.
The word teleology builds on the Greek words telos (meaning “end, purpose”) and logia, (meaning “a branch of learning”).
- 2.
The word ontology builds on the Greek words ont (meaning “being”) and logia, (meaning “a branch of learning”).
- 3.
The concepts we use are also largely influenced by our language, culture, history, place where we live, and many other contextual factors, see, e.g., [10].
- 4.
Interestingly enough, the ancient Latin word for world is mundus, meaning “clean, elegant”, itself a translation of the Greek word cosmos, meaning “orderly arrangement”.
- 5.
A general formalization of this intuition, not provided here for lack of space, will be provided in a follow-up paper and will be based on the work described in [16], which provides a formalization of the problem of theory transformation in terms of abstraction operators.
- 6.
- 7.
References
Giunchiglia, F., Mattia F.: Concepts as (recognition) abilities. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2016), vol. 283, p. 153. IOS Press (2016)
Millikan, R.G.: Biosemantics. J. Philos. 86(6), 281–297 (1989)
Prinz, J.: Beyond appearances: the content of sensation and perception. In: Perceptual Experience, pp. 434–460 (2006)
Millikan, R.G.: On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay About Substance Concepts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Forsyth, D.A., Jean, P.: Computer Vision: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2011)
Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations, vol. 13. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove (2000)
Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 43(5–6), 907–928 (1995)
Giunchiglia, F.: Managing diversity in knowledge. In: Keynote Talk, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-2006) (2006). http://www.disi.unitn.it/~fausto/knowdive.ppt
Bird, G.: Kant’s Theory of Knowledge: An Outline of One Central Argument in the ‘Critique of Pure Reason, vol. 1. Routledge, Abingdon (2016)
Giunchiglia, F., Khuyagbaatar B., Gabor, B.: Understanding and exploiting language diversity. In: IJCAI (2017)
Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, pp. 67–82 (1977)
Şahin, E., Çakmak, M., Doğar, M.R., Uğur, E., Üçoluk, G.: To afford or not to afford: a new formalization of affordances toward affordance-based robot control. Adapt. Behav. 15(4), 447–472 (2007)
Ortmann, J., Kuhn, W.: Affordances as qualities. In: FOIS, pp. 117–130 (2010)
Millikan, R.G.: Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. MIT press, Cambridge (1984)
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., Boyes-Braem, P.: Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 8(3), 382–439 (1976)
Giunchiglia, F., Walsh, T.: A theory of abstraction. Artif. Intell. 57(2–3), 323–389 (1992)
Chen, L., Nugent, C.D., Wang, H.: A knowledge-driven approach to activity recognition in smart homes. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 24(6), 961–974 (2012)
Rodríguez, N.D., Cuéllar, M.P., Lilius, J., Calvo-Flores, M.D.: A survey on ontologies for human behavior recognition. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 46(4), 43 (2014)
Ni, Q., Pau de la Cruz, I., García Hernando, A.B.: A foundational ontology-based model for human activity representation in smart homes. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 8(1), 47–61 (2016)
Barker, P., Campbell, L.M.: What is schema.org? LRMI (2015). Accessed 21 Apr 2014
Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A., Oltramari, R., Schneider, L.: Lead Partner ISTC-CNR, Ian Horrocks. WonderWeb Deliverable D17. The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies and the DOLCE ontology (2002)
Niles, I., Pease, A.: Towards a standard upper ontology. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, vol. 2001, pp. 2–9. ACM (2001)
Millikan, R.G.: Varieties of Meaning: The 2002 Jean Nicod Lectures. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Searle, J.R.: Social ontology and political power. In: Friederick, S.F. (ed.) Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality, pp. 195–210 (2003)
Macdonald, G., Papineau, D. (eds.): Teleosemantics. Clarendon Press, Wotton-under-Edge (2006)
Sober, E., Papineau, D.: Causal factors, causal inference, causal explanation. Proc. Aristot. Soc. Suppl. Vol. 60, 97–136 (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giunchiglia, F., Fumagalli, M. (2017). Teleologies: Objects, Actions and Functions. In: Mayr, H., Guizzardi, G., Ma, H., Pastor, O. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10650. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69903-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69904-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)