Advertisement

What Happened to the Frankfurt School?

  • Amirhosein Khandizaji
Chapter

Abstract

The culture industry, one of the main theories of the Frankfurt School, was neglected in the latter’s second and third generations. This neglect happened while the culture industry began to work with a different mechanism from that described by Adorno and Horkheimer. The culture industry in our age is using new techniques to extend its domination. However, these new techniques have not been studied by the second and third generations of the Frankfurt school. This disregard, on the one hand, has made a gap between the first generation of the Frankfurt School and its second and third generations and, on the other hand, caused some difficulties for the theories of Jürgen Habermas and Axel Honneth.

References

  1. Anderson, Joel. 2011. Situating Axel Honneth in the Frankfurt School Tradition. In Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, Edited by Danielle Petherbridge. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  2. Edgar, Andrew. 2005. The Philosophy of Habermas. Chesham: Acumen.Google Scholar
  3. Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro, Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  4. Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2, Translated by Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1, Translated by Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  6. Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger, Cambridge & Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction. Translated by Barbara Fultner, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. 2000. Dialectic of Enlightenment, Philosophical Fragments. Edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, Translated by Edmund Jephcott. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Honneth, Axel. 1991. The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory. Translated by Kenneth Baynes, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Honneth, Axel. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammer of Social Conflict. Translated by Joel Anderson, Cambridge and Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Honneth, Axel. 2007. Recognition as Ideology. In Recognition and Power: Axel honneth and Tradition of Critical Social Theory, Edited by Bert Van Den Brink, and David Owen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Levin, Charles. 1991. Baudrillard, Critical Theory and Psychoanalysis. In Ideology and Power in the Age of Lenin in Ruins, Edited by Arthur Kroker and Marilouise Kroker. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  13. Pusey, Michael. 1987. Jürgen Habermas. London & New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  14. Ritzer, George. 1988. Sociological theory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyFree University of BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations