From Locke to Materialism: Empiricism, the Brain and the Stirrings of Ontology

  • Charles T. Wolfe
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 331)


My topic is the materialist appropriation of empiricism—as conveyed in the ‘minimal credo’ nihil est in intellectu quod non fuerit in sensu (which interestingly is not just a phrase repeated from Hobbes and Locke to Diderot, but is also a medical phrase, used by Harvey, Mandeville and others). That is, canonical empiricists like Locke go out of their way to state that their project to investigate and articulate the ‘logic of ideas’ is not a scientific project: “I shall not at present meddle with the Physical consideration of the Mind” (Essay, I.i.2, in Locke 1975; which Kant gets exactly wrong in his reading of Locke, in the Preface to the A edition of the first Critique). Indeed, I have suggested elsewhere, contrary to a prevalent reading of Locke, that the Essay is not the extension to the study of the mind of the methods of natural philosophy; that he is actually not the “underlabourer” of Newton and Boyle he claims politely to be in the Epistle to the Reader (Wolfe 2010b). Rather, Locke says quite directly if we pay heed to such passages, “Our Business here is not to know all things, but those which concern our Conduct” (Essay, I.i.6). There would be more to say here about what this implies for our understanding of empiricism (see Norton 1981; Gaukroger 2005), but instead I shall focus on a different aspect of this episode: how a non-naturalistic claim which falls under what we now call epistemology (a claim about the senses as the source of knowledge) becomes an ontology—materialism. That is, how an empiricist claim could shift from being about the sources of knowledge to being about the nature of reality (and/or the mind, in which case it needs, as David Hartley saw and Denis Diderot proclaimed more overtly, an account of the relation between mental processes and the brain). (David Armstrong, for one, denied that there could be an identification between empiricism and materialism on this point: eighteenth century history of science seems to prove him wrong: see Armstrong 1978). Put differently, I want to examine the shift from the logic of ideas in the seventeenth century (Locke) to an eighteenth-century focus on what kind of ‘world’ the senses give us (Condillac), to an assertion that there is only one substance in the universe (Diderot, giving a materialist cast to Spinozism), and that we need an account of the material substrate of mental life. This is neither a ‘scientific empiricism’ nor a linear developmental process from philosophical empiricism to natural science, but something else again: the unpredictable emergence of an ontology on empiricist grounds.


Empiricism Materialism Senses Epistemology Ontology Brain John Locke 


Periodicals and Dictionaries

  1. Mémoires de Trévoux (1701–1767).Google Scholar

Other Primary Literature

  1. Argens, Jean-Baptiste de Boyer, marquis d’. 1737. La Philosophie du bon sens, ou Réflexions philosophiques sur l’incertitude des connoissances humaines. In à l’usage des cavaliers et du beau sexe. London: La Compagnie.Google Scholar
  2. Bayle, Pierre. 1731. Œuvres diverses de Mr. Pierre Bayle … La Haye: P. Husson et al.Google Scholar
  3. Bayle, Pierre. 1740. Dictionnaire historique et critique (1697). 5th ed. Amsterdam/Leyden/The Hague: Pierre Brunel et al.Google Scholar
  4. Bonnet, Charles. 1767. Contemplation de la nature, 3rd augmented ed. Yverdon: F.B. de Félice.Google Scholar
  5. Bonnet, Charles. 1771–83. Œuvres d’histoire naturelle et de philosophie. Neuchâtel: S. Faulche.Google Scholar
  6. Cabanis, Pierre-Jean-Georges. 1956. In Rapports du physique et du moral de l’homme (1802), in: Œuvres philosophiques, ed. C. Lehec and J. Cazeneuve. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  7. Chaumeix, Abraham-Joseph de. 1758–59. Préjugés légitimes contre l’Encyclopédie et Essai de réfutation de ce dictionnaire, avec un Examen critique du livre De L’Esprit. Bruxelles/Paris: Hérissant.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, Samuel. 1978. The works of Samuel Clarke (1738), reprint. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, Anthony. 1707. Reflections on Mr. Clarke’s second defense of his letter to Mr. Dodwell […]. In The works of Samuel Clarke, ed. Samuel Clarke, vol. 3. New York: Garland. 1978 (reprint).Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1708. An Answer to Mr. Clarke’s third defense of his letter to Mr. Dodwell […]. In The works of Samuel Clarke, ed. Samuel Clarke, vol. 3. New York: Garland. 1978 (reprint).Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1978. A philosophical inquiry concerning human liberty (1717), reprint. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  12. Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de. 1746. Essai sur l’origine des connaissances humaines. Amsterdam: Pierre Mortier.Google Scholar
  13. Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de. 1948–51. Œuvres philosophiques de Condillac, ed. G. Le Roy. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  14. Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de. 1953. Lettres inédites à Gabriel Cramer. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1991. Traité des systèmes (1749). Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  16. Cudworth, Ralph. 1678. The true intellectual system of the universe. London: R. Royston.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1731. Treatise concerning eternal and immutable morality. London: James & John Knapton.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1838. A treatise of freewill, ed. J. Allen. London: John Parker.Google Scholar
  19. d’Alembert, Jean le Rond. 1986. Essai sur les Éléments de philosophie (1759). Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  20. de Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier. 1818. Œuvres complètes. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
  21. de Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau. 1750. Essai de cosmologie. S.l.: s.n.Google Scholar
  22. Della Croce, Giovanni Andrea. 1583. Cirugia universale e perfetta di tutte le parti pertinenti al’ottimo chirurgo. Venice: Giordano Ziletti.Google Scholar
  23. Deschamps, Léger Marie. 1993. Œuvres philosophiques. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  24. Diderot, Denis. 1765. Locke. In Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers…, 625–627. Paris: Briasson, IX.Google Scholar
  25. Diogenes Laërtius. 1959. Lives and opinions of the eminent philosophers. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  26. Du Bois-Reymond, Emil Heinrich. 1912. Über die Grenzen des Naturerkennens (1872). In Reden von Emil du Bois-Reymond, revised and augmented edition, ed. E. Du Bois-Reymond, 441–473. Leipzig: Veit & Co.Google Scholar
  27. Fallopius [Falloppio], Gabriele. 1566. Opuscula. Luca Bertelli: Padua.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1584. Opera quae adhuc extant 12 mnia. Frankfurt am Main: Andreas Wechel.Google Scholar
  29. Fioravanti, Leonardo. 1582. La Cirurgia di Fioravanti, 1570. Melchior Sessa: Venice.Google Scholar
  30. Formey, Jean Henri Samuel. 1747. Recherches sur les éléments de la matière. [Berlin]: s.n.Google Scholar
  31. Frérét, Nicolas. 1986. Lettre de Thrasybule à Leucippe (1768), ed. S. Landucci. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
  32. Hartley, David. 1749. Observations on man, his frame, his duty and his expectations. London: Richardson. (reprinted by Olms 1967).Google Scholar
  33. Harvey, William. 1976. Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus (1628), Trans. G. Whitteridge. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1959. In Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1830), ed. F. Nicolin and O. Pöggeler. Hamburg, Meiner.Google Scholar
  35. Hemsterhuis, Frans, and Diderot, Denis. 1964. Lettre sur l’homme et ses rapports, avec le commentaire inédit de Diderot, ed. G. May. New Haven/Paris: Yale University Press/PUF.Google Scholar
  36. Hobbes, Thomas. 1976. Thomas White’s ‘De Mundo’ examined. Trans. H.W. Jones. London: Bradford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Holbach, Paul-Henri Thiry, Baron d’. 1971. Le Bon sens, ou idées naturelles opposées aux idées surnaturelles (1777). ed J. Deprun. Paris: Éditions Rationalistes.Google Scholar
  38. Holbach, Paul-Henri Thiry, Baron d’. 1990. Système de la Nature ou des lois du monde physique et du monde moral (1781, 1st ed. 1770), ed. J. Boulad-Ayoub. Paris: Fayard, reprint (coll. “Corpus”).Google Scholar
  39. Kant, Immanuel. 1900. Kants gesammelte Schriften, ed. Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, reprint. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  40. Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. La Mettrie, Julien Offray de. 1987. Œuvres philosophiques, ed. F. Markovits. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  42. Le Camus, Antoine. 1753. Médecine de l’esprit, où l’on traite des dispositions et des causes physiques qui sont des conséquences de l’union de l’âme avec le corps, influant sur les opérations de l’esprit […]. Paris: Ganeau.Google Scholar
  43. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1982. New essays on human understanding (1704). ed. and Trans. P. Remnant & J. Bennett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 1984. Discours de métaphysique (1686). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  45. Locke, John. 1975. Essay concerning human understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 1978. Examen de “La Vision en Dieu” de Malebranche, introduced, annotated and Trans. J. Pucelle. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 1989. In Correspondence, ed. E.S. De Beer, vol. 8. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 1990. In Drafts for the essay concerning human understanding, and other philosophical writings, ed. P.H. Nidditch and G.A.J. Rogers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  49. Mandeville, Bernard. 1976. A treatise of the hypochondriack and hysterick diseases, in three dialogues (1730), 2nd corrected edition. Delmar, New York: Scholars’ Reprints (reprint of London: J. Tonson).Google Scholar
  50. Maubec, Antoine. 1709. Principes phisiques de la raison, et des passions des hommes. Paris: Barthelemy Girin.Google Scholar
  51. Mayne, Zachary. 1728. Two dissertations concerning sense, and the imagination. With an essay on consciousness. London: J. Tonson.Google Scholar
  52. Ménuret, Chambaud Jean-Joseph de. 1765. Observation (Gram. Physiq. Méd.). In Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers…, 313–321. Paris: Briasson XI.Google Scholar
  53. Montaigne, Michel de. 1992. In Essais (1588), ed. P. Villey, 2nd ed. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  54. O’Higgins, James. 1970. Anthony Collins, The Man and his Works. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pluquet, François-André-Adrien, Abbé. 1757. Examen du Fatalisme, ou Exposition et réfutation des différens systêmes de Fatalisme qui ont partagé les Philosophes sur l’origine du monde, sur la nature de l’âme et sur le principe des actions humaines. Paris: Didot & Barrois.Google Scholar
  56. Priestley, Joseph. 1777. Disquisitions Relating to Matter and Spirit. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  57. Régis, Pierre-Sylvain. 1704. L’Usage de la raison et de la foi, ou l’accord de la foi et de la raison. Paris: chez Jean Cusson.Google Scholar
  58. Regius, Henricus. 1654. Philosophia naturalis. Amsterdam: Elzevier.Google Scholar
  59. Reid, Thomas. 2002. In Essays on the intellectual powers of man (1785), ed. Derek R. Brookes and Knud Haakonssen. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Roche, Antoine-Martin. 1759. Traité de la nature de l’âme, et de l’origine de ses connaissances. Contre le Système de M. Locke et de ses Partisans. Paris: Lottin.Google Scholar
  61. Sainte-Beuve, Charles Auguste. 1988. Mes poisons. Paris: José Corti.Google Scholar
  62. Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper. 1964. In Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times (1711), ed. J.M. Robertson. Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
  63. Staël-Holstein, Anne Louise Germaine Necker, Baronne de. 1820. Œuvres complètes. Brussels: Wahlen.Google Scholar
  64. Toland, John. 1976. Letters to Serena. New York: Garland. (reprint of London: B. Lintot, 1704).Google Scholar
  65. Willis, Thomas. 1683. Two discourses concerning the soul of brutes, Which is that of the vital and sensitive [Soul] of Man […], a Trans. of De anima brutorum (1672) by S. Pordage. London: Dring, Harper and Leigh.Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Armstrong, David M. 1968. A Materialist theory of mind. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1978. Naturalism, materialism and first philosophy. Philosophia 8 (2–3): 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayers, Michael. 1991. Locke. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, Annie. 1938. Jean Le Clerc (1657–1735) et la République des Lettres. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
  5. Bickle, John, Peter Mandik, and Anthony Landreth. 2010. The philosophy of neuroscience, revised version. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. Scholar
  6. Charles, Sébastien. 2006. Du matérialisme à l’immatérialisme: le problème âme-corps dans la philosophie clandestine. Tangence 81: 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cranefield, Paul F. 1970. On the origin of the phrase nihil est in intellectu. Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences 25: 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cranston, Maurice. 1985. Locke. A biography, 1957. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (reprint).Google Scholar
  9. Cronk, Nicholas. 2001. The letters concerning the english nation as an english work: Reconsidering the Harcourt Brown thesis. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 10: 226–239.Google Scholar
  10. Daled, Pierre F. 2005. Le matérialisme occulté et la genèse du “sensualisme”. Écrire l’histoire de la philosophie en France. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  11. Downing, Lisa. 2007. Locke’s ontology. In The Cambridge companion to Locke’s essay, ed. L. Newman, 352–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Duchesneau, François. 1973. L’empirisme de Locke. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  13. Figlio, Karl M. 1975. Theories of perception and the physiology of mind in the late eighteenth century. History of Science 13 (3): 177–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaukroger, Stephen. 2010. The collapse of mechanism and the rise of sensibility: Science and the shaping of modernity, 1680–1760. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haakonssen, Knud. 2006. The concept of eighteenth-century philosophy. In The Cambridge history of eighteenth-century philosophy, ed. Knud Haakonssen, 3–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hambridge, Roger A. 1982. ‘Empiricomany, or an Infatuation in Favour of Empiricism or Quackery’: The socio-economics of eighteenth-century Quackery. In Literature and science and medicine, ed. S. Soupel and R.A. Hambridge, 47–102. Los Angeles: Clark Memorial Library, University of California.Google Scholar
  17. Hamou, Philippe. 2004. L’opinion de Locke sur la ‘matière pensante’. Methodos 4: “Penser le corps”. Scholar
  18. Hankinson, Robert J. 1995. The growth of medical empiricism. In Knowledge and the scholarly medical traditions, ed. Donald G. Bates, 60–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, James A. 2005. Of liberty and necessity. The free will debate in eighteenth-century British philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hazard, Paul. 1963. La crise de la conscience européenne, 1680–1715 (1935). Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  21. Itard, Jean Marc Gaspard. 1994. Rapport sur les nouveaux développements de Victor de l’Aveyron (1806). In Victor de l’Aveyron, ed. François Dagognet. Paris: Allia.Google Scholar
  22. Jolley, Nicholas. 1999. Locke. His philosophical thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lagarde, André, and Laurent Michard. 1960. Les Grands Auteurs français du programme. Paris: Bordas.Google Scholar
  24. Laudan, Larry. 1981. John Locke on hypotheses: Placing the Essay in the ‘Scientific Tradition’ (1967). In Science and hypothesis: Historical essays on scientific methodology, ed. Larry Laudan, revised version, 59–71. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lega, Bradley C. 2006. An essay concerning human understanding: How the Cerebri Anatome of Thomas Willis Influenced John Locke. Neurosurgery 58 (3): 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lenin, Vladimir I. 1972. Materialism and Empirio-Criticism (1909). In Collected works, ed. Vladimir I. Lenin, vol. 14, 17–362. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Lloyd, Henry Martyn. 2013. Sensibilité, Embodied epistemology and the French enlightenment. In The discourse of sensiblity. The knowing body in the enlightenment, ed. Henry Martyn Lloyd, 171–193. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Long, Anthony Arthur. 1986. Hellenistic philosophy: Stoics, epicureans, sceptics. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Malebranche, Nicolas de. 1979. La Recherche de la Vérité (1674), In: Œuvres, ed. by G. Rodis-Lewis. Paris: Gallimard-Pléiade, vol 1.Google Scholar
  30. McCann, Edwin. 2002. John Locke. In A companion to early modern philosophy, ed. Steven Nadler, 354–374. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Métraux, Alexandre. 2000. The emergent materialism in French clinical brain research (1820–1850). A case study in historical neurophilosophy. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 22 (1): 161–189. (special issue: The Renewal of Materialism).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milton, John R. 2001. Locke, medicine and the mechanical philosophy. British Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (2): 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nagel, Jennifer. 2006. Empiricism. In The philosophy of science: An encyclopedia, ed. Sahotra Sarkar and Jessica Pfeifer, 235–243. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. O’Neal, John. 1996. The authority of experience: Sensationist theory in the French enlightenment. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Park, Katharine. 1988. The organic soul. In The Cambridge history of renaissance philosophy, ed. C.B. Schmitt and Q. Skinner, 464–484. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parmentier, Marc. 2002. Le vocabulaire de Locke. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
  37. Proust, Jaques. 1995. Diderot et l’Encyclopédie. 4th revised ed. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  38. Ratcliff, Marc. 1997. Le concept d’intensité dans la psychologie de Charles Bonnet. Revue d’histoire des sciences 50 (4): 421–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rey, Roselyne. 2000. Diderot and the medicine of the mind. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 22 (1): 149–159. (special issue: The Renewal of Materialism).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers, Graham A.J. 2007. The intellectual setting and aims of the essay. In The Cambridge companion to Locke’s “Essay concerning human understanding”, ed. Lex Newman, 7–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Romanell, Patrick. 1984. John Locke and medicine. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  42. Schliesser, Eric. 2014. Toland and Adam Smith’s Posthumous work. Diametros 40: 115–125.Google Scholar
  43. Schneewind, Jerome B. 2006. The active powers. In The Cambridge history of eighteenth-century philosophy, ed. Knud Haakonssen, 557–607. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, C.U.M. 1987. David Hartley’s Newtonian neuropsychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 23: 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sutton, John. 1998. Philosophy and memory traces. Descartes to connectionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2010. Carelessness and inattention: Mind-Wandering and the physiology of fantasy from Locke to Hume. In The body as object and instrument of knowledge: Embodied empiricism in early modern science, ed. Charles T. Wolfe and O. Gal, 243–263. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, Charles. 1964. The explanation of behavior. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  48. Thiel, Udo. 1998. Locke and eighteenth-century materialist conceptions of personal identity. Locke Newsletter 29: 59–83.Google Scholar
  49. Thomson, Ann. 2008. Bodies of thought: science, religion, and the soul in the early enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vartanian, Aram. 1953. Diderot and descartes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolfe, Charles T. 2007. Determinism/Spinozism in the radical enlightenment: The cases of Anthony Collins and Denis Diderot. International Review of Eighteenth-Century Studies 1: 37–51. (special issue: Boundaries in the Eighteenth Century).Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2009. A happiness fit for organic bodies: La Mettrie’s medical Epicureanism. In Epicurus in the enlightenment, ed. N. Leddy and A. Lifschitz, 69–83. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 2010. Empiricist heresies in early modern medical thought. In The body as object and instrument of knowledge: Embodied empiricism in early modern science, ed. Charles T. Wolfe and O. Gal, 333–344. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. ———. 2012. Forms of materialist embodiment. In Anatomy and the organization of knowledge, 1500–1850, ed. M. Landers and B. Muñoz, 129–144. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2016a. Materialism. A historico-philosophical introduction. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. ———. 2016b. The ‘physiology of the understanding’ and the ‘mechanics of the soul’: Reflections on some phantom philosophical projects. Quaestio 16: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolfe, Charles T., and Michaela van Esveld. 2014. The material soul: Strategies for naturalising the soul in an early modern epicurean context. In Conjunctions of mind, soul and body from Plato to the enlightenment, ed. Danijela Kambaskovic-Sawers, 371–421. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Wright, John P. 1987. Association, madness and the measures of probability in Locke and Hume. In Psychology and literature in the eighteenth century, ed. C. Fox, 1–29. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 1991. Locke, Willis, and the seventeenth-century epicurean soul. In Atoms, pneuma, and tranquillity: Epicurean and stoic themes in European thought, ed. M.J. Osler, 239–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yolton, John W. 1991. Locke and French materialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Sarton Centre for History of ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations