Advertisement

Balancing Paradigms in Climate Change Communication Research to Support Climate Services

  • Inez Ponce de LeonEmail author
  • Charlotte Kendra Gotangco
Chapter
  • 798 Downloads
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Initiatives such as the Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS) and Future Earth aim for co-design and co-production to create specific climate services, which in turn, require dialogue with stakeholders. Climate change communication research can help enable this dialogue. This paper proposes a more explicit articulation of the paradigms grounding climate change communication research to provide more balanced research for climate services. Paradigms or worldviews contain assumptions about the nature of reality and knowledge, and therefore drive the construction of research questions and methodologies. An assessment of peer-reviewed articles between January 2010 and August 2014 using the key phrase “climate change communication” reflects research paradigms that are dominantly post-positivist, seeking large-scale patterns to make generalizations. While these are useful, climate change communication research must also consider what approaches would value and use stakeholders’ differing perspectives towards encouraging dialogue and implementing long-term solutions with purveyors of climate services. Future research should balance the approach by exploring the use of constructivist or critical paradigms to support dialogue-based climate services. Such research is valuable in addressing the need for climate change communication professionals and scholars to (1) localize messages and (2) frame them in terms of values and issues pertinent to specific populations and groups.

Keywords

Climate change communication Paradigms Climate services Climate change communication research Dialogue-based climate services 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was partially supported by funding from the Philippine Higher Education Research Network (PHERNet) of the Commission of Higher Education (CHED) to the Ateneo de Manila University.

References

  1. Akerlof K, Maibach EM, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY, Neuman A (2012) Do people ‘personally experience’ global warming, and if so, how does it matter? Glob Environ Change 23:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Meteorological Society (AMS) (2014) Climate services: a policy statement of the American Meteorological Society. Retrieved from http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2012statement_climate_services.html
  3. Asrar G, Ryabinin V, Detemmerman V (2012) Climate science and services: providing climate information for adaptation, sustainable development and risk management. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4:88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes AP, Islam M, Toma I (2013) Heterogeneity in climate change risk perception amongst dairy farmers: a latent class clustering analysis. Appl Geogr 41:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beard CA, Thompson JL (2012) Engaging visitors in climate change communication: a case study of Southern Florida’s national parks and wildlife refuges. Appl Environ Educ Commun 11(1):25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becken S, Lama AK, Espiner S (2013) The cultural context of climate change impacts: perceptions among community members in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environ Dev 8:22–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binder AR (2010) Routes to attention or shortcuts to apathy? Exploring domain-specific communication pathways and their implications for public perception of controversial science. Sci Commun 32(3):383–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bostrom A, O’Connor RE, Bohm G, Hauss D, Bodi O, Ekstrom F, Halder P, Jeschke S, Mack B, Qu M, Rosentrater L, Sgelensminde I (2012) Causal thinking and support for climate change policies: international survey findings. Glob Environ Change 22:210–222Google Scholar
  9. Brace C, Geoghegan H (2010) Human geographies of climate change: landscape, temporality, and lay knowledges. Prog Hum Geogr 35(3):284–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S. 2002–2010. Clim Change 114:169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burns TW, O’Connor DJ, Stocklmayer SM (2003) Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public Underst Sci 12:183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buys L, Miller E, Van Megen K (2012) Conceptualising climate change in rural Australia: community perceptions, attitudes, and (in)actions. Reg Environ Change 12:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlton S, Jacobson SK (2013) Climate change and coastal environmental risk perception in Florida. J Environ Manage 130:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambliss EL, Lewenstein BV (2012) Establishing a climate change information source addressing local aspects of a global issue. J Sci Commun 11(3):1–8Google Scholar
  15. Changnon SA, Kunkel KE (1999) Rapidly expanding uses of climate data and information in agriculture and water resources: causes and characteristics of new applications. B Am Meteorol Soc 80:821–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Climate Services Partnership (CSP) (2014) What are climate services? Retrieved from http://www.climate-services.org/content/what-are-climate-services
  17. Cooney CM (2010) The perception factor: climate change gets personal. Environ Health Persp 118(11):484–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper CC (2011) Media literacy as a key strategy toward improving public acceptance of climate change science. Bioscience 61:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crona B, Wutich A, Brewis A, Gartin M (2013) Perceptions of climate change: linking local and global perceptions through a cultural knowledge approach. Clim Change 119:519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DiFrancesco DA, Young N (2010) Seeing climate change: the visual construction of global warming in Canadian national print media. Cult Geogr 18(4):517–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Change 21:680–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dirikx A, Gelders D (2010) Ideologies overruled? An explorative study of the link between ideology and climate change reporting in Dutch and French newspapers. Environ Commun 4(2):190–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eskjaer M (2013) The regional dimension: how regional media systems condition global climate change communication. J Int Intercult Commun 6(1):61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Etkin D, Ho E (2007) Climate change: perceptions and discourses of risk. J Risk Res 10:623–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feldman L, Myers TA, Hmielowski JD, Leiserowitz A (2014) The mutual reinforcements of media selectivity and effects: testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. J Commun 64:590–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Future Earth (2014) Future Earth initial design report. Retrieved from http://www.futureearth.info/sites/default/files/Future-Earth-Design-Report_web.pdf
  27. Gentle P, Maraseni TN (2012) Climate change, poverty and livelihoods: adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal. Environ Sci Policy 21:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gifford R, Comeau LA (2011) Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intention. Global Environ Change 21:1301–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gregory J, Miller S (1998) Science in public: communication, culture, and credibility. Plenumtrade, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Glover L (2006) Post modern climate change. Routledge, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  31. Guba G, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Hackmann H, Moser SC, St. Clair AL (2014) The social at the heart of global environmental change. Nat Clim Change 4:653–655Google Scholar
  33. Hamilton LC, Cutler MJ, Schaefer A (2012) Public knowledge and concern about polar region warming. Polar Geogr 35:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hatch J (2002) Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  35. Hedlund-De Witt A, de Boer J, Boersema JJ (2014) Exploring inner and outer worlds: a quantitative study of worldviews, environmental attitudes, and sustainable lifestyles. J Environ Psychol 37:40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hine DW, Reser JP, Phillips WJ, Cooksey R, Marks ADG, Nunn P, Watt SE, Bradley GL, Glendon AI (2013) Identifying climate change interpretive communities in a large Australian sample. J Environ Psychol 36:229–239Google Scholar
  37. Howe PD, Leiserowitz A (2013) Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the U.S. Glob Environ Change 23:1488–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Howell RA (2014) Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals’ attitudes and behaviour. Environ Behav 46(1):70–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jang SM (2013) Framing responsibility in climate change discourse: ethnocentric attribution bias, perceived causes, and policy attitudes. J Environ Psychol 36:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson BB (2012) Climate change communication: a provocative inquiry into motives, meanings, and means. Risk Anal 32(6):973–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Khan AS, Ramachandran A, Usha N, Aram IA, Selvam V (2012) Rising sea and threatened mangroves: a case study on stakeholders, engagement in climate change communication, and non-formal education. Int J Sustain Dev World 19(4):330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Krantz S, Monroe M, Bartels W (2013) Creating extension programs for change: forest landowners and climate change communication. Appl Environ Educ Commun 12(4):272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leemans R, Asrar G, Busalacchi A, Canadell J, Ingram J, Larigauderie A, Mooney H, Nobre C, Patwardhan A, Rice M, Schmidt F, Young O (2009) Developing a common strategy for integrative global environmental change research and outreach: the Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP). Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1:4–13Google Scholar
  44. Leonard S, Parsons M, Olawsky K, Kofod F (2013) The role of culture and traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation: Insights from East Kimberley, Australia. Glob Environ Change 23:623–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lieske DJ, Wade T, Roness LA (2014) Climate change awareness and strategies for communicating the risk of coastal flooding: a Canadian maritime case example. Estuar Coastal Shelf Sci 140:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lyytmaki J, Nygren NA, Alla-Ketola U, Pellinen P, Ruohomaki V, Inkinen A (2013) Climate change communication by a research institute: experiences, success, and challenges. Appl Environ Educ Commun 12(2):118–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maibach EW, Nisbet M, Baldwin P, Akerlof K, Diao G (2010) Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health 10:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marshall NA, Park S, Howden SM, Dowd AB, Jakku ES (2013) Climate change awareness is associated with enhanced adaptive capacity. Agr Syst 117:30–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Milfont TL (2012) The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy, and concern about global warming and climate change: a one-year longitudinal study. Risk Anal 32(6):1003–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morton TA, Rabinovich A, Marshall D, Bretschneider P (2011) The future that may (or may not) come: how framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Glob Environ Change 21:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moser SC (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 1:31–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Munang R, Rivington M, Takle ES, Mackey B, Thiaw I, Liu J (2010) Climate information and capacity needs for ecosystem management under a changing climate. Proc Environ Sci 1:206–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Myers TA, Nisbet MC, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz AA (2012) A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Clim Change 113:1105–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Naustdalslid J (2011) Climate change—the challenge of translating scientific knowledge into action. Int J Sustain Dev World 18(3):243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B (2010) Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 1:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nisbet EC, Hart PS, Myer T, Ellithorpe M (2013) Attitude change in competitive framing environments? Open/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. J Commun 63:766–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nursey-Bray M, Peel GT, Frusher S, Gardner C, Haward M, Hobday AJ, Jennings S, Punt AE, Revill H, van Putten I (2012) Communicating climate change: climate change risk perceptions and rock lobster fishers, Tasmania. Mar Policy 36:753–759Google Scholar
  58. Pasquare FA, Oppizzi P (2012) How do the media affect public perception of climate change and geohazards? An Italian case study. Glob Planet Change 90–91:152–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Podesta GP, Natenzon CE, Hidalgo C, Toranzo FR (2013) Interdisciplinary production of knowledge with participation of stakeholders: a case study of a collaborative project on climate variability, human decisions and agricultural ecosystems in the Argentine Pampas. Environ Sci Policy 26:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ponce de Leon I (2011) Science communication beliefs of researchers based in the Philippines and the United States: a qualitative analysis of research cultures and worldviews. PhD dissertation. Department of Youth Development and Agricultural Education, Purdue University, Indiana, USAGoogle Scholar
  61. Ponce de Leon I, Gotangco CK (2013) Reconciling post-positivist and post-modern worldviews in climate research and services. WMO Spec Bull 62:45–48Google Scholar
  62. Poortinga W, Spence A, Whitmarsh L, Capstick S, Pidgeon NF (2011) Uncertain climate: an investigation into public skepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Glob Environ Change 21:1015–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reid WV, Chen D, Goldfarb L, Hackmann H, Lee YT, Mokhele K, Ostrom E, Raivio K, Rockström J, Schellnhuber HJ, Whyte A (2010) Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 330:916–917Google Scholar
  64. Rudiak-Gould P (2014) Progress, decline, and the public uptake of climate science. Public Underst Sci 23(2):142–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rudiak-Gould P (2012) Promiscuous corroboration and climate change translation: a case study from the Marshall Islands. Glob Environ Change 22:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Safi AS, Smith WJ Jr, Liu Z (2012) Rural Nevada and climate change: vulnerability, beliefs, and risk perception. Risk Anal 32(6):1041–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schweizer S, Davis S, Thompson JL (2013) Changing the conversation about climate change: a theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environ Commun 7(1):42–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scott DJ, Lemieux CJ, Malone L (2011) Climate services to support sustainable tourism and adaptation to climate change. Clim Res 47:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scruggs L, Benegal S (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: can we blame the Great Recession? Glob Environ Change 22:505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sharma KD, Gosain AK (2010) Application of climate information and predictions in water sector: capabilities. Proc Environ Sci 1:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sjogersten S, Atkin C, Clarke MI, Mooney SJ, Wu B, West HM (2013) Responses to climate change and farming policies by rural communities in Northern China: a report on field observation and farmers’ perception in dryland North Shaanxi and Ningxia. Land Use Policy 32:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32(6):957–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stoutenborough JW, Vedlitz A (2014) The effect of perceived and assessed knowledge of climate change on public policy concerns and empirical comparison. Environ Sci Policy 37:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tam J, McDaniels TL (2013) Understanding individual risk perceptions and preferences for climate change adaptations in biological conservation. Environ Sci Policy 27:114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Trench B (2008) Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In: Cheng D, Claessens T, Gascoigne J, Metcalfe B, Schiele S, Shi S (eds) Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices. Springer, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  76. Ungar S (2014) Media context and reporting opportunities on climate change: 2012 versus 1998. Environ Commun 8(2):233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Van der Linden S (2014) On the relationship between personal experience, affect, and risk perception: the case of climate change. Eur J Soc Psychol 44:430–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Visbeck M (2008) From climate assessment to climate services. Nat Geosci 1:2–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weaver CP, Mooney S, Allen D, Beller-Sims N, Fish T, Grambsch AE, Hohenstein W, Jacobs K, Kenney MA, Lane MA, Langner L, Winthrop R (2014) From global change science to action with social sciences. Nat Clim Change 4:656–659Google Scholar
  80. Weber EU (2010) What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 1:332–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weber EU, Stern PC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66(4):315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weiler CS, Keller JK, Olex C (2012) Personality type differences between PhD climate researchers and the general public: implications for effective communication. Clim Change 112:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wendling ZA, Attari SZ, Carley SR, Krause RM, Warren DC, Rupp JA, Graham JD (2013) On the importance of strengthening moderate beliefs in climate science to foster support for immediate action. Sustainability 5:5153–5170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S, Lorenzoni I (2013) Public engagement with climate change: what do we know, and where do we go from here? Int J Media Cult Polit 9(1):7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wibeck V (2014a) Social representations of climate change in Swedish lay focus groups: local or distinct, gradual or catastrophic? Public Underst Sci 23(2):204–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wibeck V (2014b) Enhancing learning, communication, and public engagement about climate change – some lessons from recent literature. Environ Educ Res 20(3):387–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams AE (2011) Media evolution and the public understanding of climate science. Polit Life Sci 30(2):20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (n.d.) Climate services introduction. Retrieved from http://www.wmo.int/pages/themes/climate/climate_services.php
  89. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2014) Implementation plan of the Global Framework for Climate Services. Retrieved from http://www.gfcs-climate.org/implementation-plan
  90. Zhao X, Leiserowitz A, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C (2011) Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. J Commun 61:713–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zia A, Todd AM (2010) Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: how to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Underst Sci 19(6):743–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inez Ponce de Leon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Charlotte Kendra Gotangco
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of CommunicationAteneo de Manila UniversityQuezon CityPhilippines
  2. 2.Department of Environmental ScienceAteneo de Manila UniversityQuezon CityPhilippines

Personalised recommendations