Residential Demand Side Management in Smart Grid Using Meta-Heuristic Techniques

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 13)


The rise of energy demand is an alarming situation for mankind as it can lead towards a crisis. This problem can be easily tackled by assimilating Demand Side Management (DSM) with traditional grid by means of bi-directional communication between utility companies and consumers. This study evaluates the performance of Home Energy Management System (HEMS) using meta-heuristic optimization techniques: Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Crow Search Algorithm (CSA). The appliances are classified in three sets on the basis of their electrical energy consumption pattern. Moreover, the Real Time Pricing (RTP) scheme is used for power bill control. The core aims of this paper are to minimize electrical energy cost and consumption by scheduling of appliances, decline in peak to average ratio, while getting the best out of user comfort. Besides, simulation results illustrate that there is a trade-off between waiting time and electricity cost. The outcomes also indicate that CSA perform better as compared to GA in relation to cost.


Demand response Home energy management Optimization Smart grid User comfort 


  1. 1.
    Kuzlu, M., Pipattanasomporn, M., Rahman, S.: Communication network requirements for major smart grid applications in HAN, NAN and WAN. Comput. Netw. 67, 74–88 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Graditi, G., Di Silvestre, M.L., Gallea, R., Riva Sanseverino, E.: Heuristic-based shiftable loads optimal management in smart micro-grids. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 11, 271–280 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siano, P.: Demand response and smart grids: a survey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30, 461–478 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erdinc, O., Paterakis, N.G., Mendes, T.D.P., Bakirtzis, A.G., Catalao, J.P.S.: Smart household operation considering bi-directional EV and ESS utilization by real-time pricing-based DR. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6, 1281–1291 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karanfil, F., Li, Y.: Electricity consumption and economic growth: exploring panel-specific differences. Energy Policy 82, 264–277 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Javaid, N., Javaid, S., Abdul, W., Ahmed, I., Almogren, A., Alamri, A., Niaz, I.: A hybrid genetic wind driven heuristic optimization algorithm for demand side management in smart grid. Energies 10(3), 319 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rasheed, M.B., Javaid, N., Ahmad, A., Khan, Z.A., Qasim, U., Alrajeh, N.: An efficient power scheduling scheme for residential load management in smart homes. Appl. Sci. 5(5), 1134–1163 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ullah, I., Javaid, N., Khan, Z.A., Qasim, U., Khan, Z.A., Mehmood, S.A.: An incentive based optimal energy consumption scheduling algorithm for residential users. Procedia Comput. Sci. 52, 851–857 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Samadi, P., Wong, V.W.S., Schober, R.: Load scheduling and power trading in systems with high penetration of renewable energy resources. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7, 1802–1812 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao, Z., Lee, W.C., Shin, Y., Song, K.-B.: An optimal power scheduling method for demand response in home energy management system. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2013, 1391–1400 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rahim, S., Javaid, N., Ahmad, A., Khan, S.A., Khan, Z.A., Alrajeh, N., Qasim, U.: Exploiting heuristic algorithms to efficiently utilize energy management controllers with renewable energy sources. Energy Build. 129, 452–470 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu, Z., Tang, J., Lambotharan, S., Chin, W.H., Fan, Z.: An integer linear programming based optimization for home demand-side management in smart grid. In: 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), pp. 1–5 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma, J., Chen, H., Song, L., Li, Y.: Residential load scheduling in smart grid: a cost efficiency perspective. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7, 771–784 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ma, K., Yao, T., Yang, J., Guan, X.: Residential power scheduling for demand response in smart grid. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 78, 320–325 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al Balas, F.A., Mardini, W., Khamayseh, Y., Bani-Salameh, A.K.: Improved appliance coordination scheme with waiting time in smart grids. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(4) (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Safdarian, A., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., Lehtonen, M.: Optimal residential load management in smart grids: a decentralized framework. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7, 1836–1845 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Achicanoy M., W.O., Jimenez, J.B.: Electricity demand modeling for rural residential housing: a case study in Colombia. In: 2015 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Latin America (ISGT LATAM), pp. 614–618. IEEE, October 2015Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bharathi, C., Rekha, D., Vijayakumar, V.: Genetic algorithm based demand side management for smart grid. Wireless Pers. Commun. 93, 481–502 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Awais, M., Javaid, N., Shaheen, N., Iqbal, Z., Rehman, G., Muhammad, K., Ahmad, I.: An efficient genetic algorithm based demand side management scheme for smart grid. In: 2015 18th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems, pp. 351–356. IEEE, September 2015Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Askarzadeh, A.: A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput. Struct. 169, 1–12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kavousi-Fard, A.: A hybrid accurate model for tidal current prediction. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55, 112–118 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.COMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.PMAS Arid Agriculture UniversityRawalpindiPakistan

Personalised recommendations