Abstract
There is an accumulating body of evidence that knowledge of the statistics of multiword phrases (MWP) facilitates native language learning and processing both in children and adults. However, less is known about whether adult second language (L2) learners are able to develop native-like sensitivity to the statistics of MWP, and more importantly up until now no attempt has been made to determine to what extent variation in this ability is related to individual differences (IDs) in cognitive and affective factors. Using a within-subject design embedded in an individual-differences framework, the aim of the present study was twofold: (1) to replicate the MWP frequency effect reported in Hernandez et al. [1] with another sample of L2 learners, and (2) to determine to what extent variation in online L2 processing of MWP can be accounted for by two IDs measures, working memory (WM) and personality. We could replicate the frequency effect for MWP from the high frequency band but not for MWP from the low frequency band. Our findings revealed that while there was no main effect of WM, the Openness personality trait had a statistically significant impact on online L2 processing of MWP. However, subsequent analyses yielded three significant two-way interactions indicating that the relationship between WM, personality and online L2 processing of MWP is a complex one. Taken together our findings underscore the importance of further investigation of L2 learners’ ability to keep track of and build up knowledge of the statistics of MWPs as well as the interrelationships between the cognitive and affective IDs that impact the development of such ability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
MWP have been investigated under various cover terms including multi-word phrases/sequences/chunks or formulaic sequences [9].
- 2.
An important point to make here in connection with Krashen’s acquisition/learning hypothesis concerns the alleged distinction between second and foreign languages. There is now general consensus that the latter should be subsumed under the former term, since “underlying learning processes are essentially the same for more local and for more remote target languages, despite differing learning purposes and circumstances” ([26]: 1).
- 3.
We used Average % correct as the scoring measure for LexTALE performance, as this had the highest correlation with the criterion measure in [54]. [1] report LexTALE performance on the basis of \(I_{sdt}\) scores ([56]) The mean LexTALE score of our group of 75.35% correct corresponds to an \(I_{sdt}\) score of 0.54.
References
Hernández, M., Costa, A., Arnon, I.: More than words: multiword frequency effects in non-native speakers. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 31(6), 785–800 (2016)
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., Schoenemann, T.: Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper. Lang. Learn. 59(s1), 1–26 (2009)
McClelland, J.L., Botvinick, M.M., Noelle, D.C., Plaut, D.C., Rogers, T.T., Seidenberg, M.S., Smith, L.B.: Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14(8), 348–356 (2010)
Christiansen, M.H., Chater, N., Culicover, P.W.: Creating Language: Integrating Evolution, Acquisition, and Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)
Armstrong, B.C., Frost, R., Christiansen, M.H.: The long road of statistical learning research: past, present and future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 372(1711) (2017)
Diessel, H.: Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas Psychol. 25(2), 108–127 (2007)
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C.F., Theakston, A.L.: The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. J. Child Lang. 42(02), 239–273 (2015)
Pinker, S., Poeppel, D.: Words and rules: the ingredients of language. Nature 403(6768), 361 (2000)
Christiansen, M.H., Arnon, I.: More than words: the role of multiword sequences in language learning and use. Top. Cogn. Sci. 9, 542–551 (2017)
Bannard, C., Lieven, E.: Formulaic language in L1 acquisition. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 32, 3–16 (2012)
Conklin, K., Schmitt, N.: The processing of formulaic language. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 32, 45–61 (2012)
MacWhinney, B.: The CHILDES system. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 5(1), 5–14 (1996)
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., Tomasello, M.: A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cogn. Sci. 27(6), 843–873 (2003)
Lieven, E., Salomo, D., Tomasello, M.: Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: a usage-based analysis. Cogn. Linguist. 20(3), 481–507 (2009)
Kol, S., Nir, B., Wintner, S.: Computational evaluation of the traceback method. J. Child Lang. 41(01), 176–199 (2014)
McCauley, S.M., Christiansen, M.H.: Computational investigations of multiword chunks in language learning (2015)
Bannard, C., Matthews, D.: Stored word sequences in language learning: the effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychol. Sci. 19(3), 241–248 (2008)
Matthews, D., Bannard, C.: Childrens production of unfamiliar word sequences is predicted by positional variability and latent classes in a large sample of child-directed speech. Cogn. Sci. 34(3), 465–488 (2010)
Arnon, I., Snider, N.: More than words: frequency effects for multi-word phrases. J. Mem. Lang. 62(1), 67–82 (2010)
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., Westbury, C.: Processing advantages of lexical bundles: evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Lang. Learn. 61(2), 569–613 (2011)
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., Schmitt, N.: Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Lang. Res. 27(2), 251–272 (2011)
Conklin, K., Schmitt, N.: Formulaic sequences: are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Appl. Linguist. 29(1), 72–89 (2008)
Ellis, N.C., Simpson-vlach, R., Maynard, C.: Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and tesol. Tesol Q. 42(3), 375–396 (2008)
Durrant, P., Doherty, A.: Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguist. Linguist. Theory 6(2), 125–155 (2010)
Arnon, I., McCauley, S.M., Christiansen, M.H.: Digging up the building blocks of language: age-of-acquisition effects for multiword phrases. J. Mem. Lang. 92, 265–280 (2017)
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., Marsden, E.: Second Language Learning Theories. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)
Dörnyei, Z., Skehan, P.: Individual differences in second language learning. In: Doughty, C.J., Long, M.H. (eds.) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp. 589–630. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)
Dewaele, J.-M.: Individual differences in second language acquisition. In: The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, vol. 2, pp. 623–646 (2009)
Baddeley, A.D., Hitch, G.: Working memory. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 8, 47–89 (1974)
Daneman, M., Carpenter, P.A.: Individual differences in working memory and reading. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 19(4), 450–466 (1980)
Miyake, A., Shah, P.: MoDels of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Baddeley, A.: Working Memory, Thought, and Action, vol. 45. OUP, Oxford (2007)
Kane, M.J., Conway, A.R., Hambrick, D.Z., Engle, R.W.: Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In: Variation in Working Memory, vol. 1, pp. 21–48 (2007)
Baddeley, A.: Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4(10), 829–839 (2003)
Cowan, N.: Working Memory Capacity. Psychology Press, Hove (2012)
Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A.: The role of working memory in language comprehension. In: Klahr, D., Kotovsky, K. (eds.) Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon, pp. 31–68. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1989)
Miyake, A., Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. J. Mem. Lang. 33(2), 175 (1994)
Juffs, A., Harrington, M.: Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Lang. Teach. 44(02), 137–166 (2011)
Williams, J.N.: Working memory and SLA. In: Gass, S., Mackey, A. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp. 427–441. Routledge, London (2012)
Wen, Z., Mota, M.B., McNeill, A.: Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing, vol. 87. Multilingual Matters, Bristol (2015)
Robinson, P.: Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA. In: Robinson, P. (ed.) Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning, pp. 211–266. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2002)
Skehan, P.: Theorising and updating aptitude. Individ. Differ. Instruct. Lang. Learn. 2, 69–94 (2002)
Bolibaugh, C., Foster, P.: Memory-based aptitude for nativelike selection: the role of phonological short-term memory. In: Granena, G., Long, M. (eds.) Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment, vol. 35, p. 205. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2013)
Foster, P., Bolibaugh, C., Kotula, A.: Knowledge of nativelike selections in a L2. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 36(01), 101–132 (2014)
Conway, A.R., Kane, M.J., Bunting, M.F., Hambrick, D.Z., Wilhelm, O., Engle, R.W.: Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and users guide. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12(5), 769–786 (2005)
Linck, J.A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J.T., Bunting, M.F.: Working memory and second language comprehension and production: a meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 21(4), 861–883 (2014)
Allport, G.W.: Pattern and Growth in Personality. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1961)
Dewaele, J.-M.: Personality in second language acquisition. In: Chapelle, C.A. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2013)
Cervone, D., Pervin, L.A.: Personality Psychology. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)
John, O.P., Naumann, L.P., Soto, C.J.: Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. In: John, O.P., Robins, R.W., Pervin, L.A. (eds.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, vol. 3, pp. 114–158. Guilford Press, New York (2008)
Ehrman, M.E., Oxford, R.L.: Cognition plus: correlates of language learning success. Mod. Lang. J. 79(1), 67–89 (1995)
Verhoeven, L., Vermeer, A.: Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Appl. Psycholinguist. 23(03), 361–374 (2002)
Kaufman, S.B., DeYoung, C.G., Gray, J.R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., Mackintosh, N.: Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition 116(3), 321–340 (2010)
Lemhöfer, K., Broersma, M.: Introducing lextale: a quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behav. Res. Methods 44(2), 325–343 (2012)
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H.K., Kaushanskaya, M.: The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 50(4), 940–967 (2007)
Huibregtse, I., Admiraal, W., Meara, P.: Scores on a yes-no vocabulary test: correction for guessing and response style. Lang. Test. 19(3), 227–245 (2002)
Godfrey, J.J., Holliman, E.C., McDaniel, J.: Switchboard: telephone speech corpus for research and development. In: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP-92, vol. 1, pp. 517–520. IEEE (1992)
Cieri, C., Miller, D., Walker, K.: The fisher corpus: a resource for the next generations of speech-to-text. LREC 4, 69–71 (2004)
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., Theeuwes, J.: Opensesame: an open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 44(2), 314–324 (2012)
Waters, G.S., Caplan, D.: Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences. Mem. Cogn. 24(3), 342–355 (1996)
Stone, J., Towse, J.: A working memory test battery: java-based collection of seven working memory tasks. J. Open Res. Softw. 3(1), e5 (2015)
von Bastian, C.C., Locher, A., Ruflin, M.: Tatool: a java-based open-source programming framework for psychological studies. Behav. Res. Methods 45(1), 108–115 (2013)
Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., Tily, H.J.: Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68(3), 255–278 (2013)
Durrant, P., Schmitt, N.: To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? IRAL Int. Rev. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Teach. 47(2), 157–177 (2009)
Ehrman, M.: Personality and Good Language Learners, p. 6172. Cambridge Language Teaching Library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Gray, J.R., Braver, T.S.: Personality predicts working-memory related activation in the caudal anterior cingulate cortex. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2(1), 64–75 (2002)
Dima, D., Friston, K.J., Stephan, K.E., Frangou, S.: Neuroticism and conscientiousness respectively constrain and facilitate short-term plasticity within the working memory neural network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36(10), 4158–4163 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kerz, E., Wiechmann, D. (2017). Individual Differences in L2 Processing of Multi-word Phrases: Effects of Working Memory and Personality. In: Mitkov, R. (eds) Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology. EUROPHRAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10596. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69805-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69805-2_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69804-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69805-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)