Abstract
It has been said of Sir Arthur Eddington, whose philosophy of science included many Kantian a priori considerations, that he had been very nearsighted all his life. At a late age he was fitted for spectacles and for the first time began really to take in the visual data. The implications of this uncharitable gossip are of course that the a priori elements of Eddington’s philosophy were primarily the result of myopia and only secondarily the result of methodological and scientific considerations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Ames’s distorted room experiments are described in Bartley (1958, 216ff).
- 2.
“The Ames demonstrations … seem most plausibly accounted for by reference to the observer’s past experience” (Dember 1960, 267).
- 3.
By the time the manuscript reached its typed form, this word appeared as “seductive.” Indeed, it may be that “seductive argument” was what Hanson intended here! –WCH.
References
Bahnsen, P. 1928. Eine Untersuchung über Symmetrie und Asymmetrie bei visuellen Wahrnehmungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie108: 129–154.
Bartlett, F. C. 1916. An experimental study of some problems of perceiving and imaging. British Journal of Psychology 8 (2): 222–266.
Bartley, S. Howard. 1958. Principles of perception. New York: Harper and Row.
Bentley, I. M. 1934. The new field of psychology. New York: D. Appleton-Century Co., Inc.
Boring, E. G. 1924. Attribute and sensation. The American Journal of Psychology 35 (2): 301–304.
Dember, W. H. 1960. The psychology of perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Flügel, J. C. 1913a. The influence of attention in illusions of reversible perspective. British Journal of Psychology 5: 357–397.
Flügel, J. C. 1913b. Some observations on local fatigue in illusions of reversible perspective. British Journal of Psychology 6: 60–77.
Fisher, R. A. 1936. Has Mendel’s work been re-discovered? Annals of Science 1 (2): 115–37.
Fox, C. 1924. study in preperception. British Journal of Psychology. 15 (1): 1–16.
Gibson, J. J. 1941. A critical review of the concept of set in contemporary experimental psychology. Psychological Bulletin 38 (9): 781–817.
Graham, C. H. 1929. Area, color, and brightness difference in a reversible configuration. Journal of General Psychology 2: 470–483.
Johnson, M. L. 1953. Seeing’s believing. New Biology 15: 60–80.
Kingsley, H. L. 1932. An experimental study of 'search' The American Journal of Psychology 44 (2): 314–318.
Leeper, R. 1935. A study of a neglected portion of the field of learning—the development of sensory organization. Journal of Genetic Psychology 46 (1): 41–75.
Lewes, G. H. 1879–1880. Problems of life and mind. Boston: Houghton, Osgood, and Co.
Locke, John. 1924. An essay concerning human understanding. Ed. A.S. Pringle-Pattison. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Siipola, Elsa M. 1935. A group study of some effects of preparatory set. Psychological Monographs 46 (6): 27–38.
Toulmin, Stephen. 1953. Philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.
Wertheimer, Max. 1945. Productive thinking. New York: Harper.
Zigler, M. J. 1920. An experimental study of visual form. The American Journal of Psychology 31 (3): 273–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lund, M.D. (2018). Spectacles Behind the Eyes. In: Lund, M.D. (eds) Perception and Discovery. Synthese Library, vol 389. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69745-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69745-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69744-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69745-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)