Skip to main content

Conclusion and Reflexivity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Freedom Research in Education

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods ((PSERM))

  • 383 Accesses

Abstract

Freedom Research is an opportunity to critique some of the taken-for-granted assumptions that underpin what we do in research and to seek new ways of doing educational research. One needs, however, to ensure that what is done in the name of research is underpinned by an ethical position and by Values that prevent the researcher from doing just what he/she wants without thinking about the consequences and the virtues that guide the task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carr, W. (1995). For Education: Towards Critical Educational Inquiry. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C. (2010). Moral Development and Reality: Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman. Boston, MA: Penguin Academics, Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (1999). Taking Sides Against Research: An Assessment of the Rationale for Partnership. In D. Scott (Ed.), Values and Educational Research. London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (1995). Prologue: Theorizing Educational Practice. In W. Carr (Ed.), For Education: Towards Critical Educational Inquiry. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1958). The Development of Modes of Moral Thinking and Choice in the Years Ten to Sixteen. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, R. (1999). Overstepping the Limits: Postmodernism and the Research Process. In D. Scott (Ed.), Values and Educational Research. London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, P. (1999). Value and Objectivity in Educational Research: The Need for Nuance. In D. Scott (Ed.), Values and Educational Research. London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McArdle, K. (2018). Conclusion and Reflexivity. In: Freedom Research in Education. Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69650-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69650-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69649-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69650-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics