Advertisement

Moral Effects of Teaching Economics

  • Amitai Etzioni
Chapter
Part of the Library of Public Policy and Public Administration book series (LPPP, volume 11)

Abstract

Over the past two decades, dozens of studies have explored the relationship between exposure to economics and antisocial behavior. With a few exceptions, these studies find that economists and economics students are more likely to exhibit a range of “debased” moral behavior and attitudes, both in the controlled environment of the laboratory and in the outside world. This chapter presents a review of this research. It draws on the various studies to address the question of whether the found differences are due to a selection effect—that is, those with antisocial tendencies tend to study economics—or an indoctrination effect whereby exposure to economic theory causes antisocial behavior. The chapter suggests there is evidence that both effects play a role in explaining the debased behavior of economists and students of economics, and finally recommends that MBA programs institute course requirements in business ethics.

References

  1. Ahlert, M., K. Funke, and L. Schwettmann. 2013. Thresholds, productivity, and context: An experimental study on determinants of distributive behavior. Social Choice and Welfare 40: 957–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, A. 2008. Can education affect pro-social behavior? Cops, economists and humanists in social dilemmas. International Journal of Social Economics 35: 298–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Applbaum, A.I. 2000. Ethics for adversaries: The morality of roles in public and professional life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aspen Institute. 2008. Where will they lead? MBA student attitudes about business & society. https://assets.aspeninstitute.org/content/uploads/files/content/docs/bsp/SAS_PRINT_FINAL.PDF.
  5. Bauman, Y., and E. Rose. 2011. Selection or indoctrination: Why do economics students donate less than the rest? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 79: 318–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadsby, C.B., and E. Maynes. 1998. Choosing between a socially efficient and free-riding equilibrium: Nurses versus economics and business students. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 37(2): 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, J.R., and M.D. Irons. 1991. Are economists different, and if so, why? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Etzioni, A. 2003. My brother’s keeper. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Faravelli, M. 2007. How context matters: A survey based experiment on distributive justice. Journal of Public Economics 91: 1399–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank, B., and G.G. Schulze. 2000. Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 43: 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank, R.H., T. Gilovich, and D.T. Regan. 1993. Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frey, B.S., and S. Meier. 2003. Are political economists selfish and indoctrinated? Evidence from a natural experiment. Economic Inquiry 41: 448–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frey, B.S., W.W. Pommerehne, and B. Gygi. 1993. Economics indoctrination or selection? Some empirical results. The Journal of Economic Education 24: 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gandal, N., S. Roccas, L. Sagiv, and A. Wrzesniewski. 2005. Personal value priorities of economists. Human Relations 58: 1227–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haucap, J., and T. Just. 2010. Not guilty? Another look at the nature and nurture of economics students. European Journal of Law and Economics 29: 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu, Y., and D. Liu. 2003. Altruism versus egoism in human behavior of mixed motives. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62: 677–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laband, D.N., and R.O. Biel. 1999. Are economists more selfish than other “social” scientists? Public Choice 100: 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marwell, G., and R.E. Ames. 1981. Economists free ride, does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics 15: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roderick, J.C., H.M. Jelley, J.R. Cook, and K.A. Forcht. 1991. The issue of white collar crime for collegiate schools of business. Journal of Education for Business 66 (5): 387–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rubinstein, A. 2006. A sceptic’s comment on the study of economics. The Economic Journal 116: C1–C9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schoenfeldt, L.F., D.M. McDonald, and S.A. Youngblood. 1991. The teaching of business ethics: A survey of AACSB member schools. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (3): 237–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seguino, S., T. Stevens, and M.A. Lutz. 1996. Gender and cooperative behavior: Economic man rides alone. Feminist Economics 2: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Selten, R., and A. Ockenfels. 1998. An experimental solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 34: 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yezer, A.M., R.S. Goldfarb, and P.J. Poppen. 1996. Does studying economics discourage cooperation? Watch what we do, not what we say or how we play. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amitai Etzioni
    • 1
  1. 1.The George Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations