Outside the walls of capitol buildings throughout the country, citizens engage every day in moral dialogues—organic, disorganized, and sometimes heated interactions, from the intimate to the transnational, at the office, on the internet, in the media, and anywhere else people might address one another’s moral positions. Through these dialogues, people’s stances can shift and even form “shared moral understandings” (SMUs) that can influence policymaking. The chapter points to the change in attitudes toward environmental protection, same-sex marriage, and smoking as cases in SMU formation, and uses these and other examples to outline the process through which a SMU emerges. Finally, the chapter discusses “megalogues”—dialogues that are amplified and interlinked through multiple large groups—and the role moral dialogues in general play in community bonding and deliberating power structures.
- Akerlof, G.A., and R.J. Shiller. 2016. Phishing for phools: The economics of manipulation and deception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Anderson, M. 2016. For Earth Day, here’s how Americans view environmental issues. Pew Research Center. Google Scholar
- Associated Press. 2008. In California, protests over gay marriage vote. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/us/10protest.html.
- ———. 2014. Number of gay and lesbian TV characters growing, says GLAAD.Google Scholar
- Auter, Z. 2016. In U.S., 73% now prioritize alternative energy over oil, gas. Gallup.Google Scholar
- Belluck, P. 2004. Massachusetts arrives at moment for same-sex marriage. New York Times.Google Scholar
- Blakely, E. 2012. In gated communities, such as where Trayvon Martin died, a dangerous mind-set. Washington Post.Google Scholar
- Clinton, W.J. 1996. Public papers of the Presidents of the United States, Book 2. July 1 to December 31, 1996. United States Government Printing Office. Washington: 1998, 1635.Google Scholar
- Cohen, B. 1963. The Press and foreign policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Cole, D. 2016. Engines of liberty: The power of citizen activists to make constitutional law. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Dockterman, E. 2015. These shows helped shape America’s attitudes about gay relationships. Time.Google Scholar
- Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2016. Ideal type. Accessed 9 May 2016, http://www.britannica.com/topic/ideal-type.Google Scholar
- Etzioni, A. 1961. A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
- ———. 1996. The new golden rule. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- ———. 2007. Security first, 186–192. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Gallup. 2016). Marriage. http://www.gallup.com/poll/117328/marriage.aspx.
- Goodin, R.E. 1989. No smoking: The ethical issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, J., J.M. Jasper, and F. Polletta, eds. 2001. Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Gutmann, A. 1985. Communitarian critics of liberalism. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (3): 308–322.Google Scholar
- H.R. 3396 (104th): Defense of Marriage Act. 1996a. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/104-1996/h316.
- ———. 1996b. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/104-1996/s280.
- Haidt, J. 2012. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Hall, C. 2007. Recognizing the passion in deliberation: Toward a more democratic theory of deliberative democracy. Hypatia 22: 81.Google Scholar
- Hardwick, Bowers V. 2016. Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech. Oyez., n.d. June 9. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1985/85-140.
- Haynes, D., and M. Birnbaum. 2008. DC tries cash as a motivator in schools. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/21/AR2008082103874.html.
- Hitlin, P., and S. Tan. 2012. In social media, support for same-sex marriage. Pew Research Center. Google Scholar
- Hitlin, P., M. Jurkowitz, and A. Mitchell. 2013. News coverage conveys strong momentum for same-sex marriage. Pew Research Center. Google Scholar
- Hodges, Obergefell V. 2016. Oyez. Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, n.d. June 9. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556.
- Kleinman, A. 2013. How the red equal sign took over Facebook, according to Facebook’s own data. The Huffington Post.Google Scholar
- Lerner, M., and C. West. 1995. Jews and Blacks: Let the healing begin. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
- Lewis, A. 1982. The psychology of taxation. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
- Luker, K. 1985. Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- McCarty, M. 2014. One year out, the little red logo that transformed the marriage equality narrative. Human Rights Campaign.Google Scholar
- OED. 2016. Culture, N. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/45746?redirectedFrom=culture+war. Accessed 23 May 2016.
- Parekh, L.B. 2000. The future of multi-ethnic Britain: Report of the Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
- Perrin, A.J. 2006. Citizen speak: The democratic imagination in American life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. 2015. Gay marriage. http://www.pewresearch.org/data-trend/domestic-issues/attitudes-on-gay-marriage/.Google Scholar
- Prothero, S. 2016. Why the liberals win the culture wars (even when they lose elections). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Schmalz, J. 1993. In Hawaii, step toward legalized gay marriage. New York Times.Google Scholar
- Sen, A.K. 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (4): 317–344.Google Scholar
- Stein, A. 2001. Revenge of the shamed: The Christian right’s emotional culture war. In Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements, ed. J. Goodwin, J.M. Jasper, and F. Polletta. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Stigler, G., and G. Becker. 1977. De gustibus non est disputandum. The American Economic Review 67 (2): 76–90.Google Scholar
- Thaler, R.H. 2015. Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Thaler, R.H., and C.R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- The Montreux Declaration. 1947. Available at: http://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1999/1/1/adf279f7-80a4-4855-9215-48a5184328aa/publishable_en.pdf.
- Tönnies, F. 1955. Community and association (Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft). C.P. Loomis (Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (Original work published 1887).Google Scholar
- United States V. Windsor. 2016. Oyez. Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, n.d. June 9, 2016. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-307.
- Warren, J. 2012. Should we pay kids to read? The Atlantic.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J.Q. 1990. Interests and deliberation in the American Republic, or why James Madison would have never received the James Madison Award. PS: Political Science and Politics, 559.Google Scholar
- Wrong, D.H. 1994. The problem of order: What unites and divides society. New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1923).Google Scholar
This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.