• Marco Boggero


In spite of the increased interconnectedness and changing technology, states are far from irrelevant and remain central. The book finds state agency even in unexpected contexts, and greater agency than is generally anticipated. At the same time, the book advocates a continued international agreement on identification and this research comes strongly in support of further recognition of PMSC as an internationally assigned acronym. The epilogue articulates reflections and expectations in the light of the recent transformations in the era of populist politics.


  1. Adler-Nissen, R., & Pouliot, V. (2014). Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 889–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Branović, Ž. (2011). The Privatisation of Security in Failing States: A Quantitative Assessment. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).Google Scholar
  3. Bruneau, T. (2016). Impediments to Fighting the Islamic State: Private Contractors and US Strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 39(1), 120–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burk, J. (Ed.). (2013). How 9/11 Changed Our Ways of War. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Busch, N. E., & Pilat, J. F. (2013). Disarming Libya? A Reassessment After the Arab Spring. International Affairs, 89(2), 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frieden, J. A. (1999). Actors and Preferences in International Relations. In D. A. Lake & R. Powell (Eds.), Strategic Choice and International Relations (pp. 39–76). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. G4S. (2013, September 12). Press Release.Google Scholar
  8. Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2011). Access to Asylum: International Refugee Law and the Globalisation of Migration Control (Vol. 77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2015). Private Security and the Migration Control Industry. In R. Abrahamsen & A. Leander (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Private Security Studies (pp. 207–215). Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hofmann, S. C. (2009). Overlapping Institutions in the Realm of International Security: The Case of NATO and ESDP. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Intercept, T. (2016, March 24). Matthew Cole and Jeremy Scahill. Retrieved October, 2016, from
  13. Kuperman, A. J. (2015). Obama’s Libya Debacle: How a Well-Meaning Intervention Ended in Failure. Foreign Affairs, 94, 66.Google Scholar
  14. Mezran, K. (2016). State of Libya. The Government and Politics of the Middle East and North Africa.Google Scholar
  15. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reno, W. (1999). Warlord Politics and African States. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Van Meegdenburg, H. (2015). What the Research on PMSCs Discovered and Neglected: An Appraisal of the Literature. Contemporary Security Policy, 36(2), 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Boggero
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Advanced International StudiesJohns Hopkins UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations