Skip to main content

Participatory GIS for Urban Sustainability and Resilience: A Perspective of Social Learning and Ecology of Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lifelong Learning and Education in Healthy and Sustainable Cities

Abstract

The contemporary urbanization model is characterized by unsustainability and environmental injustice as well as social and cognitive exclusion. The search for sustainability and resilience demands better structures of social inclusion and governance to deal with multi-layer determinants and so, it is imperative to promote social participation in decision-making and urban planning. In this chapter we focus on the potentiality of Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS) in terms of fostering social learning and participation, combining spatial, technical and social knowledge and addressing sustainability and resilience issues. A review of PGIS application research findings showed that 25% of PGIS research is applied to urban studies in general, and to natural disasters in cities, such as floods and landslides. According to the review, the PGIS, through the mapping process, that includes social learning and dialogue and aims to apply the ecology of knowledge concept, presents advantages in social engagement when compared to other social participation tools. It has great potentiality to educate and empower citizens, providing better governance and urban scenarios and, therefore, promoting healthier and resilient cities.

The original version of this chapter was revised: Acknowledgement text has been newly included. The erratum to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69474-0_36

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    (http://cidadelindapp.com.br/).

  2. 2.

    (http://corridaamiga.cidadera.com).

  3. 3.

    (https://maptionnaire.com/).

References

  • Atzmanstorfer, K., Resl, R., Eitzinger, A., & Izurieta, X. (2014). The GeoCitizen-approach: Community-based spatial planning—an Ecuadorian case study. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41(3), 248–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazilian, M., Rogner, M., Howells, M., Hermann, S., Arent, D., Gielen, D., et al. (2011). Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7896–7906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. A. (1997). reinvenção da política: rumo a uma teoria de modernização reflexiva. In: Beck, U., Giddens, A., Lash, S. (Eds.), Modernização reflexiva: política, tradição e estética na ordem social moderna. Tradução de Magda Lopes. São Paulo: Universidade Estadual Paulista. pp. 11–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter, G. F. (1994). Geographic Information Systems for geoscientists: Modelling with GIS. 416p. Pergamon, Ottawa. ISBN: 9780080424200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, R., & Krzywoszynska, A. (2017). Anatomy of a buzzword: The emergency of water-energy-food nexus in UK natural resource debates. Environmental Science & Policy, 64, 164–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R., & Turton, I. (1999). Virtual Slaithwaite: A web-based public participation‘Planning for Real’s system. University of Leeds, School of Geography, Funded by the Economic and Social Research Council’s, Case Study Report, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelleri, L., Kunath, A., Minucci, G., Olazabal, M., Waters, J. J., & Yumalogava, L. (2012). Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience. Workshop Report. 1st edition. BC3, Basque Centre for Climate Change, Bilbao, Spain. ISBN: 978-84-695-6025-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) & Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI). (2014). Operationalizing the Urban Nexus: Towards resource-efficient and integrated cities and metropolitan regions (p. 104p). GIZ Eschborn, Germany: Executive Summary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, F., & Bartram, J. (2016). The water, food, energy and climate Nexus: Challenges and an agenda for action. Earthscan Studies in Natural Resource Management, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, C. H. (2002). Transparency - considerations for PPGIS research and development. Urban and Regional Information Association Journal URISA Journal, 15(1), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empinotti, V., & Jacobi. P. R. (2013). Novas práticas de governança da água? O uso da pegada hídrica e a transformação das relações entre o setor privado, organizações ambientais e agências internacionais de desenvolvimento. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, v. 27, p. 23–36, UFPR Editor, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, D. (2012). Sistema de Informações Geográficas Participativo (SIG-P) na prevenção de desastres ambientais. Estudo de caso do Morro do Baú em Ilhota/SC. MSc Dissertation. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina UDESC. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, J. C., et al. (2013). Participatory 3-dimension mapping: A tool for encouraging multi-caste collaboration to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Applied Geography, 45, 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giatti, L. L., Ribeiro, R. A., & Toledo, R. F. (2014a). Dialectic approaches and public policy interactions for social, environmental and health problems: Challenges for health promotion across territorial scales. Health, 6, 607–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giatti, L. L., Landin, R., & Toledo, R. F. (2014b). Aplicabilidade da ecologia de saberes em saúde e ambiente e sua permeabilidade na produção acadêmica. Ciência e saúde coletiva [online] vol.19, n.10 [cited 2017-04-13], pp. 4091-4102. Available at:<http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S141381232014001004091&lng=en&nrm=iso>. doi:10.1590/1413-812320141910.08902014.

  • Gibbons, M. (1999). Science’s new social contract with society. Nature, 402, supp, p. C81-4. doi:10.1038/35011576.

  • Hales, S., Butler, C., Woodward, A., & Corvalan, C. (2004). Health aspects of the Millennium. Springer US Ecosystem Assessment EcoHealth, 1(2), 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, H. (2011). Understanding the Nexus. Background paper for the bonn conference: The water, energy and food security Nexus. Copyright Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Panel on Climate Change IPCC. (2013). The Physical Science Basis—Summary for Policymakers. IPCC Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland Available at: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGI_AR5_SPM_brochure.pdf.

  • Jacobi, P. R. (2010). Aprendizagem Social, desenvolvimento de plataformas de múltiplos atores e governança da água no Brasil. Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar InterThesis., 7(1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, P. R., & Fracalanza, A. P. (2005). Comitês de Bacias Hidrográficas no Brasil- desafios de fortalecimento da gestão compartilhada e participativa. Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento, v.11–12, 9p. UFPR Editor, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, P. R., & Sinisgalli, P. A. A. (2012). Governança ambiental e economia verde. Rio de Janeiro: Ciência e Saúde Coletiva, v17, n.6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahila, M. & Kyttä, M. (2009) SoftGIS as a bridge builder in collaborative urban planning. In S. Geertman, & J. Stillwell,(Eds.), Planning Support Systems: Best Practices and New Methods, pp. 389–411. Springer. doi 10.1007/978-1-4020-8951-0_19.

  • Karabulut, A., Egoh, B. E., Lanzanova, D., Grizetti, B., Bidoglio, G., Pagliero, L., et al. (2016). Mapping water provisioning services to support the ecosystem–water–food–energy nexus in the Danube river basin. Ecosystem Services., 17, 278–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Galés, P., & Vitale, T. (2012). The missing link? Governance Modes and inequalities in large metropolis. Governing the Metropolis: Powers and Territories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi Faur, D. (2011). From big government to big governance? Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance. Working Paper No. 35, ISSN: 2079-5882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, J. G. C. (2002). De perto e de dentro: notas para uma etnografia urbana. São Paulo: Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais., 17(49), 20. doi:10.1590/S0102-69092002000200002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapping for Rights. http://www.mappingforrights.org/participatory_mapping. Accessed on 12 Apr 2017.

  • Martinez-Allier, J. (2007). O ecologismo dos pobres. São Paulo: Contexto. 379 p. ISBN 978-85-7244-358-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2006). Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? In G. F. Schuppert (Ed.), Governance-Forschung: Vergewisserung uber Stand und Entwicklungslinien (pp. 11–20). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. K. (2003). Seeking good governance in participatory-GIS: A review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory spatial planning. Elsevier Science. Habitat International, 27, 549–573. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00005-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. K. (2004). Can Participatory-GIS Strengthen Local-level Spatial Planning? Suggestions for Better Practice. GISDECO. Skudai, Johor, Malaysia, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’ governance? Geoforum, 43, 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New directions for research Paris. Editora? 28-30 November, 2012. Available in: http://www.ub.edu/sociologia/isdub/pdf/2014/article-2-gales.pdf.

  • Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work and organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 320. ISBN: 9780199231591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porto, M. F. S., & Freitas, C. M. (2003). Vulnerability and industrial hazards in industrializing countries: An integrative approach. Futures, 35, 717–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzolini, M. T. P., & Gunther, W. M. R. (2008). Impactos na Saúde das Deficiências de Acesso a Água. São Paulo. Saúde Soc., v.17, n.1, 21-32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. S. (2007). Para além do pensamento abissal: Das linhas globais a uma ecologia de saberes. Novos estudos Cebrap, v. 79, p. 71-94. ISSN 0101-3300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. S., Nunes, J. A., & Meneses, M. P. (2009). Another knowledge is possible. Beyond northert epistemologies. 1-26p. Fairlfield, USA, ISBN-13: 978-1-84467-256-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2005). Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review, 11(1), 14. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/csr.v11i1.3459.

  • Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Development (CTA). (2006). Mapping for change: Practice, technologies and communication. Participatory learning and action. n.54. IIED & CTA London, ISBN: 1 84369 605 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economics And Ecosystems Of Biodiversity—TEEB. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations. In: P. Kumar P (Ed.), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations London and Washington: Earthscan. ISBN—9780415501088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., & Duran, D. (2010). Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, S1(100), S40–S46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1995) Division of Operational Support in Environmental Health. Urban Environmental Health Unit Healthy Cities Programme. Building a healthy city: A practitioner’s guide, a step-by-step approach to implementing healthy city projects in low-income countries, a manual. Unit of Urban Environmental Health, Division of Operational Support in Environmental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO/EOS/95.10, 35 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). World Health Statistics. WHO Document Production Services, Geneva, Switzerland: Full Report.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by FAPESP – Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2015-21311-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Monteiro de Carvalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Carvalho, C.M., Giatti, L.L. (2018). Participatory GIS for Urban Sustainability and Resilience: A Perspective of Social Learning and Ecology of Knowledge. In: Azeiteiro, U., AKERMAN, M., Leal Filho, W., Setti, A., Brandli, L. (eds) Lifelong Learning and Education in Healthy and Sustainable Cities. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69474-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics