Nature-Based Education for Resilient Cities

Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)


Nature-based education, utilising green infrastructure (GI) including protected areas, presents an opportunity against the backdrop of environmental and socio-economic challenges faced by urban citizens. Evidence shows that improving access to nature-based education, can deliver multiple benefits to citizens of all ages leading to heightened wellbeing and resilience at the community level. Mental health benefits of exposure to nature include positive effects on mood, concentration, self-discipline and physiological stress. Amongst children, nature-based play and learning can support the development of motor-skills, self-esteem and emotional regulation. In social terms, nature-based activities, including nature-based rehabilitation (NBR), can help support the reintegration of minority and marginalised groups, facilitating community participation, cohesion and reducing urban tensions. In economic terms, public access to nature provides cost effective infrastructure, reducing pressures on public finances, alleviating poverty, as well as generating possibilities for employment and volunteering. Engagement with nature promotes biophilia and ecological stewardship amongst citizens, influencing consumption and mobility habits, which in turn reinforce the resilience and sustainability of entire populations. Agricultural learning in urban farms, allotments and CSA, help to bridge the rural-urban metabolic rift separating production and consumption. Finally, novel approaches to citizen-science can allow individuals to engage with monitoring and verification contributing to city level sustainability. This chapter explores the underutilised role of nature in supporting the education of urban populations across these aspects. It draws on evidence gathered in a yearlong research project for the European Commission, building on case studies from all 28 EU member states, in depth interviews, a two day conference, and a public consultation. The wider objective of the chapter is to highlight empirical evidence on nature based solutions (NBS), the multiple benefits of nature and urban GI.


Nature-based education Resilience Urban challenges Biophilia Citizens’ well-being 


  1. Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2, Part B), 73–83.
  2. Arcadis. (2016). Sustainable cities index 2016: Putting people at the heart of cities sustainability. Amsterdam/London: Arcadis. Retrieved from
  3. Aronsson, J., Tighe-Clark, M., & Waite, S. (2014). Woodland Health for Youth (WHY): An evaluation of physical health benefits derived from outdoor learning in natural environments (LINE) for school age children. Plymouth: Plymouth University. Retrieved from:
  4. Arup, & Rockefeller Foundation. (2016). City Resilience Index - Understand and measuring city resilience. London. Retrieved from:
  5. Ayutament de Barcelona. (2011). Apropa’t als parcs! Guia informativa i proposta d’activitats per implicar-te als espais verds de la ciutat. Barcelona: Barcelona City Council. Retrieved from
  6. Ayutament de Barcelona. (2013). Barcelona Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Plan 2020. Barcelona: Barcelona City Council. Retrieved from
  7. Bernhardsson, S., Aevarsson, O., Björkander, E., Blomberg, A., Ellsén, M., Ericsson, A., et al. (2016). Nature-based rehabilitation for patients with longstanding stress-related disorders. Göteborg: Västra Götalandsregionen, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, HTA-centrum.Google Scholar
  8. Bragg, R., Wood, C., Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2013). Measuring connection to nature in children aged 8–12: A robust methodology for the RSPB. Essex, UK: University of Essex. Retrieved from:
  9. Browining, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green LLC. Retrieved from
  10. Chawla, L., & Flanders Cushing, D. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437–452. doi: 10.1080/13504620701581539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Commission, European. (2015). The 2015 Ageing Report—Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). Luxembourg: P ublications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  12. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2008). The Number of School Playing Fields—Case 101795. Retrieved from
  13. Domroese, M. C., & Johnson, E. A. (2017). Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Polinator Project. Biological Conservation, 208, 40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EEA. (2014). Noise in Europe 2014 (977–8449). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from:
  15. European Commission. (2015b). Vertical Forest in Milan near completion. Brussels: DG Environment. Retrieved from:
  16. Fahey, C. (2015). How Berliners refused to give Tempelhof airport over to developers. Retrieved from:
  17. FAO. (2011). The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture (SOLAW)—Managing systems at risk. Rome: Food and Agriculture. Retrieved from:
  18. FAO. (2012). SAVE FOOD: Global initiative on food losses and waste reduction. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retreived from:
  19. Foster, B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. New York Monthly Review Press. ISBN: 9781583673805.Google Scholar
  20. Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., & Nieuwenhuijsen, J. M. (2015). Mental Health Benefits of Long-Term Exposure to Residential Green and Blue Spaces: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(4).  10.3390/ijerph120404354.
  21. Great Pollinator Project. (2014). Bee watchers. New York City: Center for Biodiversity and Conservation at the American Museum of Natural History and the Greenbelt Native Plant Center Greenbelt Native Plant Center. Retrieved from
  22. Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(756–760).  10.1126/science.1150195.
  23. Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., van Otterdijk, R., & Meybeck, A. (2011). Gloabl food losses and food waste—Extent, causes and prevention. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from:
  24. Heritage Lottery Fund. (2014). State of UK public parks 2014. Renaissance to risk? Retrieved from:
  25. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2006). In the nature of cities: Urban ecology and politics of urban metabolism. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House. ISBN: 9780375508738.Google Scholar
  27. Janssen, I., & Rosu, A. (2015). Undeveloped green space and free-time physical activity in 11 to 13-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1).  10.1186/s12966-015-0187-3.
  28. Kahlmeier, S., Wijnhoven, T. M. A., Alpiger, P., Schweizer, C., Breda, J., & Martin, B. W. (2015). National physical activity recommendations: Systematic overview and analysis of the situation in European countries. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 133. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1412-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laaksoharju, T., Rappe, E., & Kaivola, T. (2012). Garden affordances for social learning, play, and for building nature–child relationship. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lloyd, A., & Gray, T. (2014). Place-based outdoor learning and environmental sustainability within Australian Primary Schools. Journal of Sustainability Education (2151–7452). Retreived from :
  31. Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods. Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Algonquin Books. ISBN: 978-1-565-12391-5.Google Scholar
  32. Lundvall, B.-Å., & Rodrigues, M. J. (2002). The new knowledge economy in Europe : a strategy for international competitiveness and social cohesion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.Google Scholar
  33. Mayer, F., Frantz, C., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why Is Nature Beneficial? The Role of Connectedness to Nature. Environment and Behaviour, 41, 607–643. doi: 10.1177/0013916508319745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClintock, N. (2010). Why Farm the City? Theorizing Urban Agriculture through a Lens of Metabolic Rift. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 191–207. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsq005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGranahan, G., Marcotullio, P., Bai, X., Balk, D., Braga, T., Douglas, I., David, S. (2005). Urban Systems. In R. Hassan, R. Scholes, & N. Ash (Eds.), Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends (pp. 795–825). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  36. McKinley, D. C., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Ballard, H. L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S. C., Soukup, M. A. (2017). Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208, 15–28.
  37. Minx, J., Baiocchi, G., Wiedmann, T., Barrett, J., Creutzig, F., Feng, K., Hubacek, K. (2013). Carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK. Environmental Research Letters, 8(3), 035039. Retrieved from
  38. Mutafoglu, K., ten Brink, P., Schweitzer, J.-P., Jones, H., & Blake, R. (2017). Nature for Health and Equity. London/Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy, and Brussels: Friends of the Earth Europe. Retrieved from
  39. New Economics Foundation. (2012). Natural Solutions: Nature’s role in delivering well-being and key policy goals—opportunities for the third sector. London, UK: New Economics Foundation. Retrieved from
  40. Ockenden, N. (2007). Volunteering in the natural outdoors in the UK and Ireland. London: Institute for Volunteering Research. Retrieved from:
  41. Organization of the United Nations, and London: Earthscan. Retrieved from
  42. Oxfam International. (2017). An Economy for the 99%. Cowley, Oxford: Oxfam GB. Retrieved from:
  43. Popkin, B. M., Adair, L. S., & Ng, S. W. (2012). NOW AND THEN: The Global Nutrition Transition: The Pandemic of Obesity in Developing Countries. Nutrition Reviews, 70(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rechel, B., Doyle, Y., Grundy, E., & McKee, M. (2009). How can health systems respond to population ageing? Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Retrieved from WHO:
  45. Richardson, E. A., Pearce, J., Mitchell, R., & Kingham, S. (2013). Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health. Public Health, 127(4), 318–324.
  46. Robinson, K. (2012). The Trouble With Education. Out of our Minds: Learning to be creative (pp. 49–79). Haboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chaplin, S., Lambin, E. F., Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32. Retreived from:
  48. Satterthwaite, D. E. (2009). The implication of population growth and urbanization for climate change. Environment & Urbanization, 21(2), 545–567. doi: 10.1177/0956247809344361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schweitzer, J.-P., Mutafoglu, K., ten Brink, P., Paquel, K., Illes, A., Gitti, G., Ojala, A. (2016). The Health and Social Benefits of Nature and Biodiversity Protection: Annex 1: 20 Cases. Brussels/London: Institute for European Environmental Policy. Retrieved from:
  50. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2012). City and Biodiversity Outlook—Action and policy. Montreal: Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved from:
  51. Shen, L.-Y., Ochoa, J. J., Shah, M. N., & Zhang, X. (2011). The application of urban sustainability indicators—a comparison between various practices. Habitat International, 35, 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ten Brink, P., Mutafoglu, K., Schweitzer, J.-P., Kettunen, M., Twigger-Ross, C., Kuipers, Y., Ojala, A. (2016). The Health and Social Benefits of Nature and Biodiversity Protection. London/Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy. Retrieved from:
  53. Tenngart Ivarsson, C. (2011). On the use and experience of a health garden. Exploring the design of the Alnarp Rehabilitation Garden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp.Google Scholar
  54. Terrapin Bright Green. (2012). The economics of biophilia. Why designing with nature in mind makes financial sense. New York, NY, Washington, DC: Terrapin Bright Green LLC. Retrieved from:
  55. Terrapin Bright Green. (2015). Biophilic urban acupuncture: The importance of biophilia in urban places. New York, NY, Washington, DC: Terrapin Bright Green LLC. Retrieved from:
  56. UN-Habitat. (2016). SDG Goal 11 Monitoring Framework—A guide to assist national and local governments to monitor and report on SDG Goal 11 indicators. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-Habitat. Retrieved from
  57. United Nations. (2016). Report of the Inter-agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. New York: United Nations Economic and Social Council—Statistical Commission. Retrieved from:
  58. Volunteer Development Scotland. (2006). Volunteering in the natural heritage - an audit and review of natural heritage volunteering in Scotland. Stirling, UK: Volunteer Development Scotland. Retrieved from:
  59. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint—Reducing Human Impact on Earth. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. Wells, N.M., & Lekies, K.S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adulthood environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environment, 16(1), 1–24. Retreived from:
  61. Wheeler, S. M., & Beatley, T. (2014). Sustainable Urban Development Reader (3rd ed.). London, New York: Routledge. ISBN: 978-1-315-77036-9.Google Scholar
  62. WHO. (2017). Urban Green Space Interventions and Health - A review of impacts and effectiveness. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation (WHO) Regional Office for Europe. Retrieved from:
  63. Wittchen, H.-U., & Jacobi, F. (2005). Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe—a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 15(4), 357–376. doi:
  64. Woodland Adventurers. (2014). Forest Kindergaten—Finland. Retrieved February 1, 2014 from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP)—Brussels OfficeBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations