Skip to main content

A New Collaborative Paradigm of Computer Science Student Contests: An Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Conferences (OTM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10573))

Abstract

For more than 30 years now, the hallmark of competitions in Computer Science has been the time-to-complete programming contest. Though its success is indubitable for some students and some objectives, lately new paradigms have appeared, aiming at reaching more students, more Computer Science areas, and more learning objectives. This paper reports on and reflects about our academic experience with our Computer Science competition, spanning on more than three decades. The focus is on its evolution and continuous adaptation to current learning needs, goals, and contexts. The last paradigm has a free format, is fun- and skill-oriented, and aims at boosting students’ creativity and learning. The competition is based on the three-words-from-a-hat challenge and starts with the teams choosing three words from a hat, these being the keywords to be covered by the developed software application. We explain here the motivation of shifting from the traditional way, the new paradigm’s core ideas, while highlighting the lessons learnt. Having assessed it for two editions already, we can provide some conclusions on its impact on team-based competitions. Our main finding is that it inspires students to work with new ideas, to build up on their strengths and to work on their weaknesses, whilst competing for both fun and success, along with their peers. The demographic of the contest has also changed, with more girls entering competition each time. In our common view, both students and academics, the main benefit of this new paradigm is increased learning of both domain knowledge and soft skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Verhoeff, T.: The role of competitions in education. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands (1997). http://olympiads.win.tue.nl/ioi/ioi97/ffutwrld/competit.pdf

  2. Kristensen, F., Troeng, O., Safavi, M., Narayanan, P.: Competition in higher education – good or bad? Report, Department of Electrical and Information Technology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (2015). http://portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/5680982/8519800.pdf

  3. The ACM-ICPC International Collegiate Programming Contest. https://icpc.baylor.edu/

  4. IOI - International Olympiad in Informatics. http://www.ioinformatics.org/

  5. Deimel, L.: ACM international scholastic programming contest. SIGCSE Bull. 16(3), 7–12 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Skiena, S., Revilla, M.: Programming Challenges: The Programming Contest Training Manual. Texts in Computer Science. Springer, New York (2003). doi:10.1007/b97559

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bloomfield, A., Sotomayor, B.: A programming contest strategy guide. In: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE 2016), pp. 609–614. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Comer, J.R., Wier, R.R., Rinewalt, J.R.: Programming contests. In: Proceedings of the 14th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 1983, pp. 241–244. ACM, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khera, V., Astrachan, O., Kotz, D.: The internet programming contest: a report and philosophy. In: Proceedings of the 24th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 48–52. ACM, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Trotman, A., Handley, C.: Programming contest strategy. Comput. Educ. 50(3), 821–837 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu, F.L., Wu, Y.L., Ho, H.C.: An investigation of coopetitive pedagogic design for knowledge creation in web-based learning. Comput. Educ. 53(3), 550–562 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yair, G.: Key educational experiences and self-discovery in higher education. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24(1), 92–103 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Constantinescu, Z., Nicoara, S., Vladoiu, M., Moise, G.: Computer science student contests: individuals or teams? In: Proceedings of the 16th RoEduNet International Conference: Networking in Education and Research, Petru-Maior University of Targu Mures, Romania (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. RoboCup Federation. http://www.robocup.org/

  15. Bowring, J.F.: A new paradigm for programming competitions. In: Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 87–91. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sherrell, L., McCauley, L.: A programming competition for high school students emphasizing process. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Mid-South College Computing Conference, Mid-South College Computing Conference, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA, pp. 173–182 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fitzgerald, S., Hines, M.L.: The computer science fair: an alternative to the computer programming contest. SIGCSE Bull. 28(1), 368–372 (1996). Proceedings the 27th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, New York

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Intel International Science and Engineering Fair (Intel ISEF). https://student.societyforscience.org/intel-isef

  19. Siemens Competition in Math, Science and Technology. https://siemenscompetition.discoveryeducation.com/

  20. Schank, R.: Designing World-Class e-Learning: How IBM, GE, Harvard Business School and Columbia University are Succeeding at e-Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 3ITC Contest Web Page. https://timf.upg-ploiesti.ro/3ITC/

  23. Burguillo, J.C.: Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 566–575 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vroom, V.H.: Work and Motivation. McGraw Hill, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Vladoiu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vladoiu, M., Constantinescu, Z., Moise, G. (2017). A New Collaborative Paradigm of Computer Science Student Contests: An Experience. In: Panetto, H., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Conferences. OTM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10573. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69461-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69462-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics