Advertisement

Culture and Self-Esteem

Chapter
  • 933 Downloads
Part of the International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP)

Abstract

Self-esteem is a vital psychological resource and a basic human need. It can only be achieved in a world of meaning. Maslow considered self-esteem to be a universal need. Indeed, Becker (The birth and death of meaning, New York, 1971) following Adler (see Ansbacher and Ansbacher, The individual psychology of Alfred Adler, New York, 1946) saw self-esteem as the dominant human motive as evidenced by the observation that when one is lacking this quality “they cannot act, they break down” (p. 75). Self-esteem is, however, constructed differently across cultures. How should we be (personality characteristics), how should we act (behavioral prescriptions) with my fellow humans in ways that bring positive outcomes and avoid danger? What goals should we strive for and how should we strive for them? What has value? Culture provides “just those rules and customs, goals of conduct that place right action (The birth and death of meaning, New York, 1971, p. 79)” at the individuals’ disposal. People need to feel that they matter, have value and are significant. Cultures show us the way. Cultures describe the world and cultures provide guidance in addressing the essential issues of how one should be in the world and what one should do in this world. Cultures provide a description of the world and reality that many refer to as a “cultural worldview” and within the specific cultural worldview are behavioral and ontological prescriptions that if manifested and achieved allow may construct anxiety-buffering self-esteem to its adherents. What is the “right” way to be? What is the “right” thing to do? This is important when considering the central role of anxiety in the human condition.

Keywords

Worldviews Self-esteem Anxiety-buffer Social identity Fundamentalism Meaning 

References

  1. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansbacher, H., & Ansbacher, R. (1946). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. (1991). Meanings of life. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, E. (1971). The birth and death of meaning (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, E. (1975). Escape from evil. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Camus, A. (1955). An absurd reasoning the myth of Sisyphus and other essays. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, T. (2000). The lexus and the olive tree. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  9. Goldhagen, D. J. (1997). Hitler’s willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  10. Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (p. 139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Heintzelman, S. J., & King, L. A. (2014). Life is pretty meaningful. American Psychologist, 69(6), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035049.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kluckhohn, F. R. (1950). Dominant and substitute profiles of cultural orientations: Their significance for the analysis of social stratification. Social Forces, 28, 376–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, M. A. (2000). The beast reawakens: Fascism’s resurgence from Hitler’s spymasters to today’s neo-Nazi groups and right-wing extremisms. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Maslow, A. H. (1968). Music education and peak experience. Music Educators Journal, 54(6), 72–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McAdams, D. P. (2013). How actors, agents, and authors find meaning in life. In K. D. Markman, T. Proulx, & M. J. Lindberg (Eds.), The psychology of meaning (pp. 171–190). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14040-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salzman, M. B. (2001). Globalization, culture & anxiety: Perspectives and predictions from terror management theory. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 10(4), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011676025600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Salzman, M. B. (2008). Globalization, religious fundamentalism and the need for meaning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 318–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schimel, J., Hayes, J., Williams, T., & Jahrig, J. (2007). Is death really the worm at the core? Converging evidence that worldview threat increases death-thought accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.789.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: the psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 91–159). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Soros, G. (1998). The crisis of global capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  22. Stevens, M. J. (2002). The unanticipated consequences of globalization: Contextualizing terrorism. In C. E. Stout (Ed.), The psychology of terrorism (Vol. 3, pp. 31–56). London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  23. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of Hawai‘i at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations