Advertisement

The Human Condition

Chapter
  • 810 Downloads
Part of the International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP)

Abstract

Psychology has been relatively late in considering culture, its characteristics, and the functions it embodies in human life. Historically, psychology has imposed a western, ethnocentric perspective (“emic”) on culturally diverse populations. This imposition presumed that a culturally specific western (“emic”) perspective was universal (“etic”) thereby holding that all who differ from these mono-culturally specified norms were “primitive”, deviant, or deficient. Inherent in this imposition was the Type I error of pathologizing normative and adaptive cultural differences as well as supporting existing power relationships in society.

Keywords

Universals Etics Culture specifics Emics Idiosyncratic Mortality Meaning Anxiety existential Stereotypes Variform universals 

References

  1. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Ansbacher, H., & Ansbacher, R. (1946). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Arnt, J., Landau, M. J., Vail, K. E., & Vess, M. (2013). An edifice for enduring personal value: A terror management perspective on the human quest for multilevel meaning. In K. D. Markman, T. Proulx, & M. J. Lindberg (Eds.), The psychology of meaning (pp. 49–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, W. (1959, November 21). What is existentialism, Saturday Evening Post, pp. 45, 126, 129–130.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, E. (1971). The birth and death of meaning (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonas, E., & Fritsche, I. (2013). Destined to die but not to wage war: How existential threat can contribute to escalation or de-escalation of violent intergroup conflict. American Psychologist, 68, 543–558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kluckhohn, F. (1950). Dominant and substitute profiles of cultural orientations: Their significance for the analysis of social stratification. Social Forces, 28, 376–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kluckhohn, C. (1954). Southwestern studies of culture and personality. American Anthropologist, 56(4), 685–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kluckhohn, C. (1956). Culture and behavior. In G. Lindsey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. II, pp. 921–976). Redding, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, D. (1950). Lineal and nonlineal codifications of reality. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 8(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
  13. Lonner, W. J. (2000). Revisiting the search for psychological universals. Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin, 34(1–2), 34–37.Google Scholar
  14. Maslow, A. H. (1954). The instinctoid nature of basic needs. Journal of Personality, 22(3), 326–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality (revised by R. Frager, J. Fadiman, C. McReynolds, & R. Cox). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  16. Napoleon, H. (1996). Yuuyaraq: The way of the human being. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska Fairbanks, Native Knowledge Network.Google Scholar
  17. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pike, K. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague, NL: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Koole, S. L. (2004). Experimental existential psychology: Exploring the human confrontation with reality. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 3–12). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Salzman, M. (2001). Cultural trauma and recovery: Perspectives from terror management theory. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 2(2), 172–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Salzman, M. (2005). The dynamics of cultural trauma: Implications for the pacific nations. In A. J. Marsella, A. Austin, & B. Grant (Eds.), Social change and psychosocial adaptation in the Pacific Islands: Cultures in transition (pp. 29–52). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salzman, M. (2012). Dehumanization as a prerequisite of atrocity and killing. In D. J. Christie & J. E. Pim (Eds.), Nonkilling psychology (pp. 107–124). Honolulu, HI: Global Center for Non-Killing.Google Scholar
  23. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1954/1961). Social judgment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, P. B., Fischer, R., Vignoles, V. L., & Bond, M. H. (2013). Understanding social psychology across cultures: Engaging with others in a changing world (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Snyder, M., & Miene, P. (1994). On the functions of stereotypes and prejudice. In The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 33–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2004). The cultural animal: Twenty years of terror management theory and research. In J. Greenberg & S. L. K. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 13–34). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  27. Triandis, H. C., Chan, D. K.-S., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Iwao, S., & Sinha, J. B. P. (1995). Multimethod probes of allocentrism and idiocentrism. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. (2012). A theory of individualism and collectivism. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of social psychological theories (Vol. 2, pp. 498–520). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yalom, I. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of Hawai‘i at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations