Operational Risk Measurement: A Literature Review
Operational measurement is not the only target of the overall operational risk management process, but it is a fundamental phase as it defines its efficiency; furthermore the need to measure operational risk comes from the capital regulatory framework. Taking this into account, the chapter describes and compares the different methods used to measure operational risk, both by practitioners and by academics: Loss Distribution Approach (LDA), scenario analysis and Bayesian methods. The majority of the advanced banks calculate capital requirement through LDA: the chapter focuses on how it works, analysing in detail the different phases of which it is composed and its applications, in particular the Extreme Value Theory (EVT), which is the most popular one.
KeywordsLoss distribution approach Extreme value theory Scenario analysis Operational risk literature
- Alexander, C. (2000). Bayesian methods for measuring operational risk. Discussion Papers in Finance. Henley Business School, Reading University.Google Scholar
- Alexander, C. (2003). Managing operational risks with Bayesian networks. Operational Risk: Regulation, Analysis and Management, 1, 285–294.Google Scholar
- BCBS. (2001). Operational risk. Supporting document to the New Basel Capital Accord. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Consultative Document. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsca07.pdf.
- BCBS. (2004). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs107.htm.
- BCBS. (2009). Results from the 2008 loss data collection exercise for operational risk. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. www.bis.org/publ/bcbs160a.pdf.
- BCBS. (2011). Operational risk—Supervisory guidelines for the advanced measurement approaches. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. www.bis.org/publ/bcbs196.htm.
- Bee, M. (2005). Copula-based multivariate models with applications to risk management and insurance. University of Trento: Department of Economics Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Cavallo, A., Rosenthal, B., Wang, X., & Yan, J. (2012). Treatment of the data collection threshold in operational risk: case study with the lognormal distribution. The Journal of Operational Risk, 7(1).Google Scholar
- Chavez-Demoulin, V., & Embrechts, P. (2004a). Advanced extremal models for operational risk (p. 4). ETH, Zurich: Department of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Daneshkhah, A. R. (2004). Uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment: A review. The University of Sheffield, August 9.Google Scholar
- Degen, M., Embrechts, P., & Lambrigger, D. D. (2007). The quantitative modeling of operational risk: Between g-and-h and EVT. Astin Bulletin, 37(02), 265–291.Google Scholar
- Dionne, G., & Dahen, H. (2007). What about Underevaluating Operational Value at Risk in the Banking Sector? Cahier de recherche/Working Paper, 7, 23.Google Scholar
- Dutta, K., & Perry, J. (2006). A tale of tails: An empirical analysis of loss distribution models for estimating operational risk capital (Working paper series). Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, pp. 6–13.Google Scholar
- Embrechts, P., Furrer, H., & Kaufmann, R. (2003). Quantifying regulatory capital for operational risk. Derivatives Use, Trading and Regulation, 9(3), 217–233.Google Scholar
- Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., & Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling extremal events. Applications of Mathematics, 33.Google Scholar
- Figini, S., Gao, L., & Giudici, P. (2013). Bayesian operational risk model. University of Pavia: Department of Economics and Management, 47.Google Scholar
- Frachot, A., Georges, P., & Roncalli, T. (2001). Loss distribution approach for operational ris’. Credit Lyonnais.Google Scholar
- Frachot, A., Roncalli, T., & Salomon, E. (2004). The correlation problem in operational risk (p. 38052). Germany: University Library of Munich.Google Scholar
- Giudici, P. (2004). Integration of qualitative and quantitative operational risk data: A Bayesian approach. Operational Risk Modelling and Analysis, Theory and Practice, RISK Books, London, pp. 131–138.Google Scholar
- Guegan, D., & Hassani, B. K. (2013). Operational risk: A Basel II++step before Basel III. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 6(1), pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
- Heckman, P. E., & Meyers, G. G. (1983). The calculation of aggregate loss distributions from claim severity and claim count distributions. In Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, 70, 133–134.Google Scholar
- Heideman, M., Johnson, D., & Burrus, C. (1984). Gauss and the history of the fast Fourier transform. IEEE ASSP Magazine, 1(4), 14–21.Google Scholar
- Hillson, D. A., & Hulett, D. T. (2004). Assessing risk probability: Alternative approaches (pp. 1–5). PMI Global Congress Proceeding: Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
- Jobst, A. (2007). Operational risk: The sting is still in the tail but the poison depends on the dose. International Monetary Fund, pp. 7–239.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 263–291.Google Scholar
- Klugman, S. A., Panjer, H. H., & Willmot, G. E. (2008). Loss models: From data to decisions. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Larsen, P. (2015). Operational risk models and maximum likelihood estimation error for small sample-sizes. arXivpreprintarXiv:1508.02824.Google Scholar
- Moscadelli, M. (2004). The modelling of operational risk: Experience with the analysis of the data collected by the Basel Committee. Bank of Italy: Economic Research and International Relations Area, 517.Google Scholar
- Moscadelli, M., Chernobai, A., & Rachev, S. T. (2005). Treatment of incomplete data in the field of operational risk: The effects on parameter estimates, EL, and UL figures. Operational Risk, 6, 28–34.Google Scholar
- Pakhchanyan, S. (2016). Operational risk management in financial institutions: A literature review. International Journal of Financial Studies, 4(4), 20.Google Scholar
- Panjer, H. H. (1981). Recursive evaluation of a family of compound distributions. ASTIN Bulletin, 12(01), 22–26.Google Scholar
- Powojowski, M. R., Reynolds, D., & Tuenter, H. J. (2002). Dependent events and operational risk. Algo Research Quarterly, 5(2), 65–73.Google Scholar
- Rozenfeld, I. (2010). Using shifted distributions in computing operational risk capital. Available at SSRN.Google Scholar
- Scenario Based AMA Working Group. (2003). Scenario-based AMA. Working paper, London.Google Scholar
- Shevchenko, P. V., & Peters, G. W. (2013). Loss distribution approach for operational risk capital modelling under Basel II: Combining different data sources for risk estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.1882.
- Sklar, M. (1959). Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges (p. 8). No: Université Paris.Google Scholar
- Sundt, B., & Jewell, W. S. (1981). Further results on recursive evaluation of compound distributions. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 12(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
- Svensson, K. P. (2015). A Bayesian Approach to Modelling Operational Risk When Data is Scarce (Working Paper).Google Scholar
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Utility, probability, and human decision making. Springer Netherlands, pp. 141–162.Google Scholar
- Watchorn, E. (2007). Applying a structured approach to operational risk scenario analysis in Australia. APRA.Google Scholar